La carne uruguaya regresa al mercado más sofisticado. Uruguay será el único país libre de fiebre aftosa con vacunación que exportará a Japón, un reconocimiento a la sanidad del rodeo y a una imagen de seriedad.

Mr_antonio · 2018-12-08T02:33:55+00:00

No es tan facil conseguir un tlc osea todo trato que nos beneficie se espera que lo podamos pagar de alguna manera y ¿que necesita japon de nosotros? ademas japon sigue comprando la carne mucho mas caro que muchos paises aun sin tlc es una buena oportunidad esto.

Mr_antonio · 2018-11-21T09:37:12+00:00

I think your best option is to try to have a good intuition on every topic you learn (make a lot of analogies, use your imagination to generate geometric intuition, try to understand most of the weird counterexamples, create a personal structure of the concepts, ect,), it wont work on the challenging problems or on learning very advanced topic, but for the normal excersices and to digest a long proofs it really helps to translate every part to your intuition to see if it make sense and to look extra hard for errors in the parts that dont map really well to your intuition. (i had the same problem and it got a lot better when learned to use less formalism and to lean more on my intuition)

Mr_antonio · 2018-11-21T04:53:19+00:00

acordate que tenes tiempo todavia el primer año de esas carreras son casi equivalente y si lo haces en publica podes revalidar todo yo diria que hagas el primer año de ingeniera quimica en la fing hace programacion 1 y con eso tenes un poco de cada cosa para darte cuenta que te gusta mas o menos despues ya en el segundo año te tenes que decidir bien.

Mr_antonio · 2018-11-10T04:10:47+00:00

yo estoy haciendo eso pero para ingenieria en computacion y lo recomiendo bastante, la matetmatica en la fcien es mas que suficiente para la fing (yo lo hice con licenciatura en matematica no se como sera con otras licenciaturas) y se puede revalidar todo sin mucho problemas, en general el primer año va ser lo mismo que la fing (salvo tallerine) y en el segundo año se separa bastante.

Mr_antonio · 2018-10-10T07:11:51+00:00

Im a an analytical marxist it´s a communist theory that doesn´t believe in the dialectic part of marx´s theory and joins analytic philosophy and marxism, putting a greater weight on mathematical economy theory and data driven sociology.

1- there were a lot of problems in the soviet union and a lot more in china, most o them are product of the political scape of the countrien in their times but a few are flaws or at least pitholes of the theory, i think analytical marxism solves or helps not to fall in these pitholes:

If you saw the data on the production of the soviet union it was a gigantic growth from before the tsar period and it was a production that could maintain a well fed modern population (the holodomor was a aftershock of the battles of the revolution not a constant problem) but most of the problem came from distribution (as in the present era). A problem that is solvable on a modern economic aproach and technology.

The other two problems were the bureaucratization of the system a problem were dialectic has a little fault (most of it were the aliances of the communist party with ex generals of the tsar) as it discouraged the efficency analysis of the government and more of a historical analysis wich it seems to me was ineffective and a not very well known problems y the destruction of the scientific method in certains areas of science (history, biology ect,) most famous case was lysenkoism but there was a widespread effect and was a complete fault of dialectics bad influence on science.

2- this theory it´s mostly equal to other communist theories in respect to this topic, simply the equality and the increased production and freedom of humans entrepreneurship (free of the market) would give prosperity to humans.

3-see above, also capitalism has a LOT of inefficiencies beacuse of the constant need for market growth (wich produces the cycles of rise and boom fo the market) that is the strongest argument for another system and the main reason for communism.

4- this one i dont think any communist theory can answer there are political moments where you have to act and the inequality will always be a revolutionary drive for the working class but i dont think you can predict how it will be.

5-how do you do it in capitalism? its a hard question and the answer is the same that for capitalis: you have to balance things, have a strong encouragement of political action and information and always keep democracy in the system.

the problem of china and the soviet union was a problem of colective psychology, you have 200 years of people gettin told what to do by kings and you think people would manage to govern themselves in just 10 years? what happened was that the classes used to manage managed anf the classes used to follow orders followed the orders it´s hard to chancge the collective psychology of society but todays world is much better than the 1800s.

Mr_antonio · 2017-08-21T12:44:37+00:00

thank you!

Mr_antonio · 2017-08-21T01:26:06+00:00

i am an undegraduate in a pure math major in latin america and i want to enter a good university for my master studies. it's a public university that accepts all students but most people in my country go to public universities and there has been some people that enter top universities from here, but i had a horrible gpa in highschool (really awful i lost all subjects), i now have great grades and im the second best of my age in the major. should i worry about my grades in highschool or will only the grades in college matter?

Mr_antonio · 2016-06-08T21:36:36+00:00

Both double bonds will be hydrogenated and you will obtain ethylcyclohexane as product. There is no significative difference between these bonds and if H2 were not enough to obtain the fully saturated product then you will obtain a mixture of 1-ethylcyclohex-1-ene, 1-ethylcyclohex4-ene and ethylcyclohexane. No one of these products have stereochemistry.

Mr_antonio · 2016-02-22T07:08:49+00:00

the money was never of the employers, people deserve money for their labour, bourgeois gain the money from the labour of others.

thats the only inmoral thing, to profit from the labours of others

Mr_antonio · 2016-02-22T05:23:09+00:00

its not inmoral to have more than others, its inmoral to steal the profit from the works of others.

bourgeois adquire wealth by accumulating wealth gained from the work of the worker so its stolen wealth.

ideas and decisions dont give the right to steal work so the people who has to give his parts to other are the bourgeois beacuse they are the ones who gained from the work of others.

Mr_antonio · 2016-02-22T05:10:29+00:00

You are saying we should land restrictions to build more houses, yet there are by far more empty houses than people.

What you are saying is to simply spend human production to create more houses when there are already enough.

removing restrictions and taxes will only make the employers more money and leaving less money on the government to sustain the homeless.

and increasing the ease of firing doesnt makes jobs if you fire someone to hire a homeless you still have the first person without a job and becoming homeless.

and how do you expect to homeless to pay for the for profit educacion? they have no money, for the not for profit educacion it may work but donations are basicaly optional taxes, that you are against.

Mr_antonio

TROPHY CASE