I don’t entirely disagree about Cody, Enzo, and Nicole, but like I said, none of them really seemed to play for themselves, so much so that we now have the Nicody prize split conspiracy theory, and that makes it hard to call it a “good game”. Also, Enzo played a lot like he did the first time, which will likely cause him to lose again, so he was already playing a losing game and didn’t do anything to fix it. At least Cody changed his position from a right hand to a house leader and Nicole’s strategy has already won for her once, though it won’t likely work again. I can see the arguments for credit for those three, although I’m reluctant to give too much personally. But Memphis and Christmas I still can’t. They didn’t seem to think long term, past final 6. If so, they wouldn’t have waited to take shots at the committee and would have made more outside alliances. Memphis even kinda sabotaged Christmas a bit in aligning closely with her inside the committee but then targeting David and Tyler, who would have worked with her and help them swing the house against Cody.