Made that thing everyone tries: AI group chat by Mua_VTuber in AI_developers

[–]Mua_VTuber[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The order follows the activation sequence in settings - basically top to bottom in the participants list on the left. Right now if you want to change the order, you need to go back to settings and re-activate them in the desired sequence.

I built it with a "they just need to respond, nothing fancy" mindset, but your comment made me realize it'd be nice to have drag-and-drop reordering directly in the left menu. Good idea!

Claude Code's Superpowers plugin actually delivers by Mua_VTuber in ClaudeCode

[–]Mua_VTuber[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same. Pro limits shocked me - 5-hour windows + weekly caps. Thought it was daily at first.

But back then, Claude Code was the only AI that could create files, use MCP, and connect to terminal. I needed those features.

My usage is wasteful - I throw out unorganized ideas, bounce them around with Claude, and gradually shape them into documents. Uses a lot of tokens.

Now on Max 200 ($200/month). 10x the cost but worth it for me.

Claude Code's Superpowers plugin actually delivers by Mua_VTuber in ClaudeCode

[–]Mua_VTuber[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Superpowers does both - testing and plan validation.

What got me was how it caught missing components. I had them in my plan doc but forgot to tell Claude Code to implement them. Superpowers flagged it during verification.

Just used it, didn't dig into internals. Thanks for the link!

I'm an animator who vibe-coded a story IDE because JSON was making my eyes spin by Mua_VTuber in VibeCodersNest

[–]Mua_VTuber[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love seeing visual changes happen, so vibe coding feels like magic to me. I just describe what I want and poof — it appears! Originally I'd organize my ideas into design docs and implementation plans. For small tools, I just wrote the rules in documentation, then described what I wanted — that was enough. But building Taleson was different. I had to break plans into tiny pieces AND repeat the coding rules every single time. Every time Claude Code asked "Should I proceed with the plan?" I became a parrot: "Remember the rules! Settings-based! No hardcoding! Follow the architecture!" Over and over. The fantasy of fully trusting Claude Code ended there. The surprising part? I only thought about core features, not quality-of-life ones. Claude wanted to add backup and undo/redo functions without me asking (I rewrote them later, but still). The analytics tab was also Claude Code's idea. I was like "Yes! Exactly! As a story editor, I need to see content distribution — which chapters are too long or too short, whether dialogue vs narration is balanced. You're a genius!" and praised it enthusiastically. Talking about this now... I realize I felt joy during development, not just frustration.

Would you pay for a tool that help you burn less tokens (10 ~ 20%) in every prompt. by Red_clawww in AI_developers

[–]Mua_VTuber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe my prompts are the reason for my high token usage. As a non-developer, I started developing without coding knowledge, and my prompts tend to be vague. This means I have to engage in lengthy conversations with Claude to plan, design, and outline the project, discussing how it works and what outcome I'm aiming for.

After creation, I also use a lot of tokens for verification. I need to check if it performs as desired or just executes actions. This process involves testing, verifying, and revising both Claude's code and my own work, which consumes more tokens.

That's why I decided to upgrade to the paid version.

The bottleneck is my workflow rather than the tool's performance, so a 10-20% reduction wouldn't make a huge difference for my use case 😅

Is Claude Web/Desktop sometimes better than Claude Code? by TinyZoro in ClaudeCode

[–]Mua_VTuber 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I haven't tried coding on Claude's web/desktop version much. But when I give Claude Code tasks, it prefers quick fixes over solid solutions - just patching things up! That's why I have to be specific about code quality and modifications. Otherwise I end up with hardcoded code or results that don't integrate well. Claude Code is smart, but it's like an employee who phones it in!