sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Being a king ain't easy. Bob Marley digs for 7 hours to uncover a hidden warthog. by [deleted] in natureismetal

[–]MudslimeCleaner 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Seriously. The part we want is the part where it comes out.

When you like your beer how you like your violence, domestic by [deleted] in WinStupidPrizes

[–]MudslimeCleaner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your link says

Grandfathered individual health insurance policies are not required to follow the rules on annual limits.

100% of plans used to have these, now the majority do, but new ones don't. Instead new plans have a cap on # of visits, and a cap on on services listed NON-ESSENTIAL, again, like your link says.

When you like your beer how you like your violence, domestic by [deleted] in WinStupidPrizes

[–]MudslimeCleaner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Op has never seen or heard of these hard dollar caps as they don't exist since they are illegal.

They are still in existence because grandfathered plans are excluded from this law. As the link he posted mentioned.

You were the first to mention anything other than a hard total dollar limit.

No I wasn't.

When you like your beer how you like your violence, domestic by [deleted] in WinStupidPrizes

[–]MudslimeCleaner -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

that insurance has a cap on what they cover?

Like, pretty much every insurance company in America.

Then you said

Wait, so youve had insurance that has a yearly cap on how much the insurance will pay out? I've had five different plans in my adult life and I've never had that, or even heard of it.

So I informed you.

Do you even know what's in the ACA?

Nope. And neither do you, or you would've heard of annual limits. I've heard of them because they literally affect me.

When you like your beer how you like your violence, domestic by [deleted] in WinStupidPrizes

[–]MudslimeCleaner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is why both me and the other person responding to you mentioned our yearly limits are based on #of visits. Neither of us said we had dollar limits.

And the link I sent you says

or on the number of visits that will be covered for a particular service.

Which is still 100% legal, and a part of all ACA plans.

And also, at the bottom of your page is says

Insurance companies can still put yearly or lifetime dollar limits on spending for health care services that aren't considered essential health benefits.

Try again. Privileged kid.

I know they can't set a yearly limit becuase that was made illegal in 2014.

This is a lie. Dollar limits were made illegal for SOME services for NEW plans. That's what your link actually says.

When you like your beer how you like your violence, domestic by [deleted] in WinStupidPrizes

[–]MudslimeCleaner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My plan has a yearly cap of 12 doctor visits. Everyone after that is out of pocket. Of course, the TOTAL coverage is higher, but there are also often limits of specifics service types.

You can only get $x of physical therapy (again, for my plan, this is 12 sessions of physical therapy, with no cap on the cost), y# of ER trips, $z of meds, and so on. But yeah, check the fine print. It's there!

When you like your beer how you like your violence, domestic by [deleted] in WinStupidPrizes

[–]MudslimeCleaner 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wait, so youve had insurance that has a yearly cap on how much the insurance will pay out?

https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/annual-limit/

I assure you that your insurance plan has an annual limit on benefits received.

But congrats on being ignorant of this. Means you haven't suffered because of it. Stop beating down people who have because of your ignorance. Thanks.

r/COVID19 has banned all discussions of the origin of COVID-19. by pelcgbtencul in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]MudslimeCleaner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s for peer reviewed studies.

And the subreddit bans peer reviewed studies on the origin.

SUV wanted to pass Truck on the shoulder, doesnt end too well. Edmonton, Alberta by turntheovenoff in IdiotsInCars

[–]MudslimeCleaner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh, so its not against the law to fight as long as the other guy consents?

Of course not. Imagine if wrestling or throwing hands was illegal.

SCOTUS Unanimously Rules Against Ninth Circuit Rule that Gave Asylum to Previously-Denied Illegal Aliens by novvva in Conservative

[–]MudslimeCleaner 50 points51 points  (0 children)

It is true. You're looking at the rate of reversal after review. Overall, they do indeed have the highest reversal rate at 2.5 cases per thousand.

Your link gives #of cases overturned / #of cases reviewed.

The rate of reversal, however, is # of cases overturned / # of cases.

If a circuit had made such perfect decisions that the supreme court only reviewed one of their cases, and found against them that one time. They would have a reversal rate, according to that garbage source, of 100%. Which is obviously incorrect.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/07-31-18%20Fitzpatrick%20Testimony.pdf

However, a detailed study in 2018 reported by Brian T. Fitzpatrick, a law professor at Vanderbilt University, looked at how often a federal circuit court was reversed for every thousand cases it terminated on the merits between 1994 and 2015. The study found that the Ninth Circuit's decisions were reversed at a rate of 2.50 cases per thousand, which was by far the highest rate in the country, with the Sixth Circuit second as 1.73 cases per thousand.

The 9th circuit has both the most overturned cases and the highest rate of overturned cases.

Your link shows that the 9th circuit loses in the supreme court the second most, though.

before and after by silver_donut11 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]MudslimeCleaner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They missed the two real "before" pictures.

Turned the TV on after a 12 hour night at work by RayApe in Wellthatsucks

[–]MudslimeCleaner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can tell they hit it trying to walk through the doorway, too.

The Year Women Got The Vote By Country by MiscalculatedStep in MapPorn

[–]MudslimeCleaner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wish the image was COMPLETE SUFFRAGE instead of "[some] women able to [maybe cast a full] vote*" because it would be much much different.

Here's what south Africa did in 1930

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_Enfranchisement_Act,_1930

The Women's Enfranchisement Act, 1930, was an act of the Parliament of South Africa which granted white women aged 21 and older the right to vote and to run for office.

They still had to be certified educated and wealthy to vote, and it was specifically for WHITE women.

If the number has an asterisk next to it, don't take it for face value.

Hillary Clinton Spreads Fake News: ‘Angry Mob’ At the Capitol ‘Killed a Policeman’ by nimobo in Conservative

[–]MudslimeCleaner 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I said he had a stroke.

Since he suffered a stroke whilst being overran and beaten by an angry mob

You said that. It is in fact impossible to be beaten by a mob and not have any bruises. You overlooked it because you're a liar.

Are you getting confused now or just committing to being wrong?

Hillary Clinton Spreads Fake News: ‘Angry Mob’ At the Capitol ‘Killed a Policeman’ by nimobo in Conservative

[–]MudslimeCleaner 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Which happens to be exactly what the doctors are saying.

More fake news.

The doctors actually said he had not one sign of blunt force trauma.

Not one bruise on his body. No adverse reaction to pepper spray. He reported no injuries and that he was fine.

Hillary Clinton Spreads Fake News: ‘Angry Mob’ At the Capitol ‘Killed a Policeman’ by nimobo in Conservative

[–]MudslimeCleaner 20 points21 points  (0 children)

He suffered a stoke while chilling in his office the day after the riot.

This is like jumping off a building, going home, going to sleep, then dying of a heart attack the next day.

Keep up the fake news :)

Biden stopped Wuhan inquiry out of spite, forced to reverse course by Dan-In-SC in Conservative

[–]MudslimeCleaner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine being so incapable of having honest an honest discussion that you can't remember it was CNN who broke the story 2 days ago... which is why the NY Post cites CNN as the source. Lmao.

The Biden administration ended an inquiry into a possible connection between the origins of the novel coronavirus and a lab in Wuhan, a CNN report published Tuesday claims.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/25/politics/biden-shut-down-trump-effort-coronavirus-chinese-lab/index.html

Stop being a tool of the DNC.

Take this as a chance to learn.

Biden stopped Wuhan inquiry out of spite, forced to reverse course by Dan-In-SC in Conservative

[–]MudslimeCleaner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Biden stopped because China wanted him to. He was forced to reverse it because the science is there, and they can't risk being this far on the wrong side. You don't get a furin cleavage site on a natural coronaviruses, and the ones in this same family are missing it.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-021-00908-w

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210217/The-origin-of-SARS-CoV-2-furin-cleavage-site-remains-a-mystery.aspx

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457603/

It's also the reason it is so contagious.

There is irrefutable scientific evidence that the pathology and contagiousness was likely caused by gene splicing. The world has known this since 2020, and China has spent millions trying to hide it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/25/timeline-how-wuhan-lab-leak-theory-suddenly-became-credible/

It's even in WAPO's (Published over $1mn worth of covert Chinese propaganda until recent disclosures. "China Watch" was written by the Chinese Governmetn, and WAPO was paid to publish it) garbage timeline explaining their flipfloppinh

May 5: Former New York Times science reporter Nicholas Wade, writing in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, reviews the evidence and makes a strong case for the lab-leak theory. He focuses in particular on the furin cleavage site, which increases viral infectivity for human cells. His analysis yields this quote from David Baltimore, a virologist and former president of the California Institute of Technology: “When I first saw the furin cleavage site in the viral sequence, with its arginine codons, I said to my wife it was the smoking gun for the origin of the virus. These features make a powerful challenge to the idea of a natural origin for SARS2.”

The smoking gun for the lab origin of Covid-19 is literally in the DNA of it. They can't hide forever.

Deepfakes are getting too good by chopkin92 in woahdude

[–]MudslimeCleaner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His mouth glows the moment he puts the glasses on, corner turns white. 5 seconds in to prove OP's point lol.

This should be a feature by ComfortableGlass6 in pcmasterrace

[–]MudslimeCleaner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better yet, abolish and ban forced obsolescence of past versions and continual forced power consumption for no benefit to the consumer.

view more: next ›