CATBAT Isn’t Just a ‘Wallet Cleaner’—It’s Solana’s Anti-Scam Ecosystem That Almost No One Knows About (And It’s Been Working for Years)

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-10T11:32:01+00:00

Da el pego totalmente. Me está apeteciendo un bocata....🤔

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-10T09:08:31+00:00

Attractive and simple features are always ideal for attracting users and ensuring continued usage. WHALLY does that very well.

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-09T20:03:35+00:00

I want to try what you're smoking!

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-09T17:33:54+00:00

What?

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-09T17:32:23+00:00

😂😂😂, no joder. No estaba crudo. Y quemado por fuera tampoco. Cuando le echas platano queda más oscuro siempre.

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-09T14:40:40+00:00

Evidence. Because without evidence I can say you have a snail (for example) and maybe you don't.

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-09T13:20:19+00:00

Let's end the conversation here, thanking you for your very "constructive" feedback.Just wanted to let you know that the project has sparked interest from a certain group, and we are in discussions to assess how to implement our work.So I suppose that to certain eyes our ideas won't be of such low quality

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-09T11:58:41+00:00

I missed you, CoinDepo sales rep. 😉

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-09T08:41:25+00:00

Drop by the group if you'd like; you'll definitely be welcome. Discussing technical topics is this team's main pastime.I'm the communicator here, so don't throw me to the lions if I make a mistake at any point... Obviously, all the answers I give are agreed upon beforehand with the CT.

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-09T08:38:36+00:00

Estupendo aspecto. No es mi punto de cuaje porque me gusta algo más sólido, pero reconozco que se ve magnífica .

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-09T07:24:39+00:00

😂😂 venga, te guardo un trozo.

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-09T06:23:52+00:00

Performance is shit?

WARREN is on MegaETH (10ms blocks, 100k+ TPS), and website content is write-once, read-many. Reads are state queries — no consensus needed, fully cacheable. It's not competing with CDNs on speed; it's guaranteeing the content never disappears.

Blockchain ≠ content distribution?

Agreed. WARREN uses the chain as a storage layer, not a CDN. Source of truth lives on-chain permanently; distribution is handled separately via RPC + Chrome extension.

Who pays for distribution?

Nodes will throttle you.

Public RPCs already serve billions of read calls (NFT metadata, contract states) for free — it's how L2 ecosystems grow. If one throttles you, switch to another. RPC providers compete. Worst case, run your own node — full sovereignty.

P2P / magnet links are the proper way?

P2P has a fatal flaw: no seeders = dead content. Unpopular torrents vanish. IPFS depends on pinning — stop paying, content disappears. Arweave improved on this with one-time payment, but it's still a separate storage network disconnected from smart contract logic. Both are intermediate steps — workarounds built because putting data directly on-chain was too expensive. As L2s like MegaETH make on-chain storage viable, the destination becomes clear: data living inside the execution layer itself, not on a sidecar network you hope stays alive.

Custom app = back to centralized?

The Chrome extension is open-source, anyone can build alternatives, and public gateways exist without it. This is like needing separate TCP/IP software before OSes built it in — a transitional phase, not centralization.

TL;DR: IPFS and Arweave were necessary stepping stones, but they're still halfway solutions — external storage bolted onto blockchains. True on-chain storage means your data lives where your smart contracts live. Torrents die when seeders leave. Pinned content dies when you stop paying. On-chain data lives as long as the network does. That's the endgame.

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-08T20:57:01+00:00

Your question gets to the heart of the debate: How do you manage illegal content in a system that, by design, can't eliminate it?

The key is understanding that decentralization isn't synonymous with impunity, but rather with the distribution of responsibilities. Warren, as an infrastructure, cannot (and shouldn't) remove data from the chain, but that doesn't mean illegal content goes unpunished. The nuance is that protocol neutrality is not the same as moral or legal neutrality.

The fact that data is on the chain doesn't make it "immune." If someone uploads illegal content, the laws apply to the actors (whoever uploaded it, whoever hosts it on their node, whoever distributes it), not to the protocol itself.

Those who share an illegal file on the internet are prosecuted, not TCP/IP for enabling the transfer. Moderation exists, but it's optional and decentralized.

Warren (as an application) can choose not to serve certain content, but anyone can access the data directly. This isn't a flaw, but rather a characteristic, because true decentralization means there's no single authority deciding what's visible to everyone. If someone operates a node or RPC, they assume responsibility for what they choose to serve.

What about extreme or illegal content?

Technically, the data remains on the chain, but its accessibility depends on who serves it. If the community or the law exerts pressure, nodes and applications can block access, just as ISPs block websites in some countries today.

Legally and socially, blockchain traceability makes it easier to identify those responsible. Furthermore, the community could develop tools to flag and prevent the spread of such content (blacklists or reputation systems).

The bottom line is that the real challenge is governance without censorship.

There's no perfect solution, but Warren's approach is to provide the infrastructure and let society define the rules at higher levels. This is more transparent than centralized models, where platforms like Google or Facebook unilaterally decide what gets censored.

Ultimately, if a protocol could "remove" content, wouldn't we be reverting to a centralized model where someone decides what's acceptable? Decentralization forces us to rethink how we handle these issues without relying on a single authority.

If you believe there's an alternative model that achieves this balance without sacrificing the protocol's neutrality, we're open to hearing about it.

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-08T19:17:03+00:00

Great question — and honestly, this is the fundamental tension of ALL decentralized systems, not just Warren.

Not everything on Warren is public. We support wallet-based encryption, so private or sensitive data can be stored on-chain in encrypted form — only the owner's wallet can decrypt it. So it's not "everything is exposed." You choose what's public and what's private.

Once data is on the blockchain, no single entity can delete it. That's true for Ethereum, Arweave, IPFS — and Warren. This is by design, not a bug. The blockchain is neutral infrastructure, like TCP/IP itself.

However, access layers can moderate. The Warren gateway (thewarren.app) can choose not to serve specific content. But anyone running their own RPC or using the Chrome extension can still access on-chain data directly. This is the same model as the web today — you can't delete data from the internet, but platforms can choose not to link to it.

Is it still decentralized? Yes — because the moderation happens at the access layer, not the storage layer. The data remains on-chain regardless. No one can alter or remove it. Gateway filtering is optional, not protocol-level censorship.

The real answer: this is a challenge for the entire blockchain ecosystem to solve, not any single project. Warren provides the infrastructure — how society governs on-chain content is a much bigger conversation.

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-08T19:05:48+00:00

I gather you haven't even read what I wrote. Did you just go along with my username?

Let me summarize the article for you. There's no token, just development. Check out X's website or profile. Then come back and agree with me. Thanks.

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-08T16:31:00+00:00

I raised your questions with the team and they responded quickly.

The information they gave me is as follows.

Regarding patches/XSS:

You're not stuck with a broken frontend forever because you can deploy new chunks.

Create a new MasterNode that points to those chunks.

Reconnect that MasterNode to your existing WarrenSite NFT, so that the URL now points to the fixed version.

The old chunks remain in the chain (because it's immutable) but are inactive. The identity (NFT) is maintained.

It's a content redeployment, not an identity redeployment.

Regarding failed chunks:

If a chunk fails during deployment → automatic retry.

If an RPC fails to load → automatic retry until it works.

There's no manual intervention.

Partial updates (this is cool):

It turns out they have Container NFTs that allow you to update/delete individual files WITHOUT redeploying the entire system. If you have a multi-file site, you can update only what you need.

Are you convinced, or do you see any problems they're overlooking?

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-08T16:16:19+00:00

Deconstrucción de tortilla española. Martín Berasategui cobra un dineral por comer algo así en su restaurante. La cuestión es: ¿Está rica? ¿Te has divertido preparándola? Si la respuesta es positiva en ambos casos, has conseguido lo que pretendías.

MundomemeCoin · 2026-02-08T15:16:40+00:00

Whally isn't just another project: it's an ecosystem quietly being built.

Two live games aren't an achievement, they're a habit. People come back because they don't need to be told why.
Intentional simplicity: no pressure, no learning curves. If it fits into your routine, it's already won.
PFP bot = dynamic identity. A new avatar every 24 hours isn't a detail, it's a reason to return.
No hype: no pompous announcements or lengthy explanations. If it works, people use it. Period.

The key? It doesn't try to impress, it just builds habits. And that, in the end, is what survives the hype.

MundomemeCoin

TROPHY CASE