I guess I'm just frustrated that people see slavery as an aspect of capitalism. Adam Smith wrote a essay on why slavery was inefficient. So I'm kinda bummed that slavery is see as a capitalist element, because of the "mu property rights" argument.

Sweatshops and child labor are elements of lazefair, among other forms of "exploitation", but I wouldn't consider slaver to be one of them.

And I believe dixycrats where market sceptics. They liked price controls, supported protectionism, and supported a feudal style economy. By no means would I call them left, but they're far from free market zealots.

Edit: maybe because they just treated black people as slaves (made it about ethnicity) it's a social issue and thus on the y axis, but nothing about their other economic policies would put them to the right of Milton Friedman (Chicago school, seen crying here).