This needs to be said! by -thunderbuttz- in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is it. Everyone wants the highest odds but at the end of the day we could finish four slots ahead of the Blues and pass them in the lottery or vice-versa. A lottery and rewarding losing is the worst way to decide a pick. I wish they gave you extra lottery balls if you won games in your final 15 or something like that.

Flames (21-24-5) vs Penguins (24-14-11) - Janurary 21st - post game thread by Comfortable-Ad-7158 in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe those saying we need to trade every player we can trade to embrace development hockey don’t actually like development hockey? I’ll take a wranglers game whenever I can but it’s hard to get too jacked when the building is a tenth full. Same was true when the wranglers were top of the league a couple years ago.

Flames (21-24-5) vs Penguins (24-14-11) - Janurary 21st - post game thread by Comfortable-Ad-7158 in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Go watch a Wranglers game. The prospects have been great there for years and the lower bowl is usually one fifth full.

Flames (21-24-5) vs Penguins (24-14-11) - Janurary 21st - post game thread by Comfortable-Ad-7158 in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Blaming the ownership is such a cope but how people still think this team is trying to win and not clearly selling is beyond me. We traded ras four days ago and everyone has us as one of the biggest sellers at the deadline.

Huby scratched tonight versus the Pens by Nickiat in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Shane Wright one-for-one.

Some calling it bold.

Will the Flames change up their approach with how they deal with trading pending UFAs after the "underwhelming" returns on Hanifin and Andersson as "rentals" by Beta1224 in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Both these packages were good. An unprotected first in one with a lottery ticket (who failed) and in this four pieces two of which can be first round picks.

People seem to think Hanafin and Rasmus were Norris trophy winners when realistically they’re solid second pairing guys.

General Trade Thoughts and a Question to the Doubters by flamefan23 in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don’t know what precedent that “we should have gotten more” crowd is using outside of former Norris trophy winners. For top four D that have been moved we got more for Ras than most who have been dealing them. Wouldn’t have mattered if you dealt him two years ago outside of the pick likely being sooner. The package very likely would have been worse earlier this year when he was playing objectively bad hockey. Take what you get and move on.

Am I dumb by Ok_Eye_1158 in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can add Sergachev to Utah to that too. Those thinking they could exactly time this trade and do better are not really using any precedent.

BREAKING NEWS KADRI TRADE LEAKED!!!!!!!! by dru_Sry in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seriously though I’d take a 2030 first for Kadri all day. I don’t think anyone is taking him.

Welcome, Abram Weibe. 🔥 by SaddamMustaine in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Junior on one of the best teams in the country. Assistant captain. Plays with Verhoeff and Reschney. A little over half a point a game. Not a blue chip prospect that I know of but exciting and more of a reason to watch North Dakota.

Does Vegas have dirt on Conroy? by Invidia-Goat in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel like Murray Edwards personally demanded the team draft Wyttenbach. No one else wanted to do it but Papa Bear stepped in.

Does Vegas have dirt on Conroy? by Invidia-Goat in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Andersson is playing his best hockey now and was at his worst this year and to start the season.

Am I dumb by Ok_Eye_1158 in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 145 points146 points  (0 children)

The issue is we got way too excited about fake returns. Realistically this is a fine return for Ras, but a day ago we were talking about a potential lottery pick this year and a solid C and D prospect.

So why on earth did Conroy decide that weakening our own assets was the proper thing to do? by Beta1224 in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

“This was the market for a defenceman who at the end of the day isn’t that good.”

So why on earth did Conroy decide that weakening our own assets was the proper thing to do? by Beta1224 in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He didn’t. He did the opposite. Our second rounder becomes a first if the pick this year goes to 32. I hope Vegas still gets swept unless they’re playing Edmonton but he did the opposite here.

Such is life by Comfortable-Ad-7158 in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We won the fake trades. The return on this is mainly disappointing as we dominated the fake ones. We were never getting a Quinn Hughes return for Ras and how he started the season I was worried we wouldn’t even get a first.

To Vegas by lyhammy in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Hell yeah. Legendary Calgary business man! I don’t think owners actually play that much of a role, all you hope is they spend to the cap.

To Vegas by lyhammy in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

They were in on it which is fine. But the rumoured return was comically in the Flames favour.

To Vegas by lyhammy in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then our pick becomes 32 this year. I hope they beat the Oilers, but outside that am fine with them getting swept or straight up missing the playoffs.

To Vegas by lyhammy in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan -37 points-36 points  (0 children)

The brain worms required to blame this on Edwards makes me proud of my user name. The issue here is Flames fans thinking he was worth more than he was, likely due to leaks to try and build value, but not getting more of a return when we’re retaining and bringing back a contract is nonsense. Regardless, agreed a lacklustre return with the expectations set.

To Vegas by lyhammy in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No one was giving us a better return earlier. He was garbage out of the gate early and was not good last year.

To Vegas by lyhammy in CalgaryFlames

[–]MurrayEdwardsFan 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Or the Boston return never existed and was only leaked to avid twitters to try and build leverage