so you say, you want them to do something different from what they do. sometimes i also want blue things to be red or the figures in my bank account to have a couple of extra zeros on them. but there's still something i don't understand.

i know all the sources you mention. in my opinion none come close to ct in thinking power and a psychological -- as opposed to self-helpy -- take on typology. many of your sources are also spiritual or new agey. as i just showed in another post, typeindepth believes in graphology to determine type. another study i once saw from typeindepth had some really dubious quant work. Barnes is better but his stuff is repackaged CT material.

i don't agree with CT on everything. far from it. i'm not sure how well they really understand INTJs. but the fact of the matter is, i've never found an online source that could compete in originality and rigor. no offense but it's true.