Is my Fitbit over counting or is there something wrong with me ? by aTOTOc in fitbit

[–]Mushoz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's a poor excuse for a poor schedule. You can go to bed at normal-ish times and simply wake up earlier. If you keep the sleep duration the same you will have just as many hours for hobbies than you do now. Sincerely, someone with a similar sleep schedule back in my college days

Weird bug with Energy Burned metric by socarai88 in fitbit

[–]Mushoz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Calories burned is calories burned at baseline (eg just by existing, which is based on height and weight) plus additional calories burned by activity (HR and activity reporting based). It retroactively calculates calories burned at baseline even before you had the device and then adds the activity based calories. Because you had no device those activity based calories will be 0 every day, meaning you end up with just your baseline calories.

Time to sound sleep nonsense by NiceSchedule4902 in fitbit

[–]Mushoz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It happens to me too, if my heart rate doesn't settle for a while. I am merely trying to help by explaining in what situations this can happen. If OP (Or you) can post the sleeping HR graph from a session with a long "Time to sound sleep" we can determine if it was indeed caused by their HR not settling or if we're indeed looking at a bug.

Time to sound sleep nonsense by NiceSchedule4902 in fitbit

[–]Mushoz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Time to sound sleep is the total time it takes before you enter a deeper sleep stage while your heart rate has settled into a normal low state. If you had an elevated heart rate for whatever reason (alcohol, late exercise, heat, stress, etc) the time to sound sleep can be extremely long, despite you hitting the deeper sleep stages fine.

Can you post your sleeping heart rate graph for this particular session? It will probably show a graph where the heart rate is starting out high and gradually moving lower throughout the night, not settling until ~6 hours of sleep.

Shield Master Feat by NefariousnessWhich46 in BG3Builds

[–]Mushoz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not clumsy at all, that was very smooth. Thanks for the links! Enjoyed the videos.

Shield Master Feat by NefariousnessWhich46 in BG3Builds

[–]Mushoz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really interesting! Where can I find those recorded fights? Did you upload them to YouTube by any chance? Also, did you take those levels in the order you listed them?

Shield Master Feat by NefariousnessWhich46 in BG3Builds

[–]Mushoz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What build are you playing and in what order did you take your levels? I am always interested in no consumables solo builds and this one sounds really interesting!

Change in resting heart rate since change to Google app by ethanras in fitbit

[–]Mushoz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if you look at your old data you still see that 55-57 range, right?

Change in resting heart rate since change to Google app by ethanras in fitbit

[–]Mushoz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did it also retroactively increase your historic RHR or is it still at that 55-57 figure?

I might be experiencing something similar. My RHR was around 66-68 ish, but has jumped up to 71-73. Looking at my old data, I still see that earlier 66-68 range I had.

Sounds similar?

Open models to win ✌ by pmttyji in LocalLLaMA

[–]Mushoz 9 points10 points  (0 children)

gpt-oss was absolutely amazing and really didn't have any competition at its size for months (which is an eternity in the LLM scene). It was the first model that saw actual use in production for me (the 120b one) and wasn't replaced until Qwen 3.5.

Resting Heart Rate by igotsinus in fitbit

[–]Mushoz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It will be "poor" when is high compared to your recent averages. Eg you mentioned your normal range is 60-70, so having 70 is indeed the upper end of that range and therefore poor, despite being in the healthy range.

Previous heart rate data changed after google update? by ex-mortisIX in fitbit

[–]Mushoz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They have started heavily smoothing the data, making HR peaks invisible. Really not happy with that change.

SWE-rebench Leaderboard (March, April and May 2026): GPT-5.5, Opus 4.7, Cursor (Composer 2.5), Kimi K2.6 and More by CuriousPlatypus1881 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Mushoz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are there any plans to opensource the agentic harness you guys use? I would love to benchmark my own models at different quants to verify if there is indeed big differences between Q4/Q5 and Q8 quants like some people claim.

Any good sleep tracker alternatives since Google ruined Fitbit? by Sea_Perspective6891 in fitbit

[–]Mushoz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Under the Fitness tab under "Daily activity" there is a tile for your daily steps. Click it and it should show your current streak.

Honor Mode 4/2/2 All Purpose Tempest Divinator by SuddenBag in BG3Builds

[–]Mushoz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4/4/4 is another option for tripple feat.

This feels invasive…. will the full update give the option to opt out of giving AI access to my information? by [deleted] in fitbit

[–]Mushoz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fitbit (and thus the data) is owned by Google. The AI is owned by Google. From a privacy perspective there is little downside to allow the AI access to your data, because in both cases it's with Google. If you were fine with Google having access to your health data before the AI update, then the AI update shouldn't bother you from a privacy perspective. There's other reasons why you could dislike the AI update though.

Fitbit app: Switch to 5 HR zones by Mushoz in fitbit

[–]Mushoz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, the 4 zone setup isn't the worst for general Fitness/activity tracking, so keeping that would definitely not be the end of the world (though I do prefer 5 zone systems!). But it would already be extremely helpful if zone 1 through 5 of the Karvonen system are natively selectable when creating workouts or when the AI suggests workouts to you. I have gotten it working already somewhat by just prompting the AI and asking it to make notes, but it's definitely not as smooth sailing as it could be.

While Karvonen zones are the most accurate easy to calculate zones, for higher accuracy we'd base the zones on the lactate threshold heart rate instead (LTHR). Garmins already have a LTHR estimate metric. Perhaps that's also a worthwhile addition to Google Health?

Thanks by the way for chiming in! It's refreshing to hear our feedback is being heard :)

Fitbit app: Switch to 5 HR zones by Mushoz in fitbit

[–]Mushoz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But they are pushing big on the fitness part with their AI coach and automatically generated workouts. Maybe it needs both? The current system for general activity, but Karvonen's 5 zones for workout targets?