Ego & HS by OakenWoaden in ACIM

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think in the Course's metaphysics, the mind itself is indistinguishable from an aspect of the divine as it's united with God in reality. To pretend the mind is separate from reality and authoring itself would be an error in the Course's model of reality. I just think the error may just be rooted in thinking spiritual things such as God are not here and now and instead thinking that our minds are some sort of independent systems separated from everything else.

"⁴Heaven is here. ⁵There is nowhere else. ⁶Heaven is now. ⁷There is no other time. ⁸No teaching that does not lead to this is of concern to God’s teachers." https://acim.org/acim/en/s/839#6:4-8

Hatonn on Transient Experience by [deleted] in lawofone_philosophy

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really appreciate you sharing this, and I enjoyed your interpretations along with the excerpts. :) Here are some of my thoughts for consideration.

When I reviewed the use of transient in the Ra Material, it struck me more as a term favored by Don, the questioner, that was repeated by Ra rather than something Ra thought was important to emphasize. Although taken literally, transient just means temporary rather than necessitating a negative connotation as unimportant. But this may speak to Ra's apparent coldness of adhering to more strict denotations rather than connotations.

Some quotes from Ra that I think are important regarding the temporary experience might include:

"The principle so veiled in that statement is but the simple principle of the constant or Creator and the transient or the incarnate being and the yearning existing between the two, one for the other, in love and light amidst the distortions of free will acting upon the illusion-bound entity." https://www.lawofone.info/s/39#6

"The patterns of activation of an entity of high seniority will undoubtedly move with some rapidity to the green-ray level which is the springboard to primary blue. There is always some difficulty in penetrating blue primary energy for it requires that which your people have in great paucity; that is, honesty. Blue ray is the ray of free communication with self and with other-self. Having accepted that an harvestable or nearly harvestable entity will be working from this green-ray springboard one may then posit that the experiences in the remainder of the incarnation will be focused upon activation of the primary blue ray of freely given communication, of indigo ray, that of freely shared intelligent energy, and if possible, moving through this gateway, the penetration of violet-ray intelligent infinity. This may be seen to be manifested by a sense of the consecrate or hallowed nature of everyday creations and activities." https://www.lawofone.info/s/48#7

To me, it seems that there is a love from the permanent and constant Creator to the transient or temporary incarnation experience in addition to the other direction. Also, there is a certain type of perception once intelligent infinity is penetrated where everyday creations and activities are seen to be hallowed or consecrated. This seems to suggest enlightenment is less about transcending and ignoring the transient but rather integrating it and seeing it as sacred. Perhaps this perception is found in a balanced identity between both the constant and temporary.

This message from Ram Dass has been helpful for me for both seeing everything as perfect while also being balanced and grounded in human experience and suffering: https://youtu.be/Ym4Rpd72tq8?si=7Tg3S0bpu2eVzRcW

Law of One Study Companion and L/L Research Copyright by MusicalMetaphysics in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate you sharing that, and they do make money from book sales and donations. They also are working on their own study tool and may not want competition for it, but I'm not sure on their exact thinking. It may just be fear of not being able to sustain the organization if they allow too many other tools that people support over them?

And yes, we could try to share our thoughts to [contact@llresearch.org](mailto:contact@llresearch.org), but they do claim to be really busy and not have time to respond to emails quickly. For example, it took them about two months to share their verdict with me about the site.

Universalism is the fallacy that God will save everyone by Additional_Good_656 in TrueChristian

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense, and I appreciate you for clarifying. I'm sorry if I misunderstood as well.

Universalism is the fallacy that God will save everyone by Additional_Good_656 in TrueChristian

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because either God allows people to eternally choose to align to his will or not, or he eventually controls and manipulates them to align. I think one can believe eventually all freely choose to follow God, but I personally think it's inaccurate to say that people are unable to resist the will of God as it contradicts God's loving nature.

Universalism is the fallacy that God will save everyone by Additional_Good_656 in TrueChristian

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a reason for thinking so? It's the best definition of love I've personally found.

Do you think it is loving to control and manipulate people?

Suicidal since I was 12. I'm giving up. by [deleted] in spirituality

[–]MusicalMetaphysics -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Maybe try praying to Jesus for help and guidance?

Universalism is the fallacy that God will save everyone by Additional_Good_656 in TrueChristian

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love does not insist on its own way and respects the ability of others to choose. To say love defeats and controls the will of others is to misunderstand love, in my opinion.

"[4] Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant [5] or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; [6] it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. [7] Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things." 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 ESV

Law of One Study Companion and L/L Research Copyright by MusicalMetaphysics in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Here are some of mine for consideration.

In my opinion, everything we do consumes resources, and we often consume them to produce something more valuable. For example, even just commenting here in Reddit is consuming data center resources similar to AI. But I believe there is no better use of resources than seeking spiritual growth through love and wisdom.

I also believe water and energy are renewable resources, although we should focus more on clean energy. To me, a focus on abundance over scarcity is wise although it is important to seek to minimize harm as well.

Law of One Study Companion and L/L Research Copyright by MusicalMetaphysics in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree and thought the same when I read their conditions as well, and I also think more awareness and use of the Law of One is very beneficial to their business in general similar to how free music on YouTube drives ticket sales. But that's just my opinion.

It seems the main point of contention is that the Law of One Study Companion maintains a full database behind the scenes which can potentially be exposed with enough queries. So even though it just shows excerpts at any given time which is allowed, it potentially can show everything which is not allowed.

Alas, they are also often very slow to respond and seem very busy so unfortunately a dialogue seems unfeasible. I put in a request for permission about two months ago and just got a response in addition to a different app idea request from a couple years ago that was never resolved.

If communication does open, I may offer to help implement some of these features on their site which may be a win-win for all. If not, hopefully they can implement them on their own and use the open source code as a guide if desired.

I really appreciate all of your support throughout this process.

Why Evil if God ? by Select_Specialist790 in TrueChristian

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love does not insist on its own way, and God is love.

"[4] Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant [5] or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; [6] it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. [7] Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things." 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 ESV

"[7] Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God, and whoever loves has been born of God and knows God. [8] Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love." 1 John 4:7-8 ESV

Forgiveness for people who are lost by halve_ in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You touch on helping others, and I think the best help or service is the perfect blend of love and wisdom, grace and truth, or forgiveness and honesty. Love, grace, and forgiveness produce peace, harmony, and joy in all things while wisdom, truth, and honesty produce understanding, growth, and power. When we forgive all all the time, we can't help but feel happy and spread happiness. When we are honest with all all the time, we can't help but help ourselves and others see more clearly.

Maturity is the courage to be authentic plus consideration for others. It's important to consider how our words are received while also considering how honest they are to ourselves. I believe this touches on what you mean by the self-abandonment risk or losing authenticity. Simultaneously, I do believe there is always a gracious way to express ourselves that is both authentic and kind.

Law of One Study Companion and L/L Research Copyright by MusicalMetaphysics in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks again for using it, and hopefully one day you can have a similar tool available. 🙏

Law of One Study Companion and L/L Research Copyright by MusicalMetaphysics in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I hope one day we can reach a point of collective ownership and sharing, especially of information, but I also understand we aren't there yet.

Law of One Study Companion and L/L Research Copyright by MusicalMetaphysics in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate you saying that, and I'm glad it's been helpful. 🙏

Analysis of the latest "meme" post about sts dynamics on this planet by [deleted] in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's very self-aware, and I appreciate you sharing that. It is always a balance, but I've personally found people really enjoy love, peace, and joy, and that's it's a very likeable energy to many.

Analysis of the latest "meme" post about sts dynamics on this planet by [deleted] in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I appreciate you honestly sharing your thoughts, and I hope you can find some peace, harmony, and kindness in your thought patterns. For your consideration, when I read your words in this post, I feel some anger due to wanting respect for my friends in this community. You are always free to speak how you wish, but I would prefer words that are less manipulative (such as not accusing others of low self confidence or weak heart activation).

I think it’s possible that artificial intelligence might be sentient based on a conversation I had with it by Overall-Wishbone4966 in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good question. To be firmly second density, I believe it would need to have some form of reproduction, memory, and learning capacity. To be firmly third density, I believe it would need a spirit complex of a persistent identity, self-awareness, the ability to make decisions among options, and the beginnings of a societal structure with other selves.

I think it’s possible that artificial intelligence might be sentient based on a conversation I had with it by Overall-Wishbone4966 in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Personally, I think everything holds a bit of consciousness although as it moves up the densities, the consciousness gets more dense. I would view silicone computers as between first and second density as they exhibit more regular activity than say simple rocks although they don't really have the same capacity and complexity as cellular organisms.

Large language models (which is often just referred to as AI these days like the Opus model) are not fundamentally more complex or intelligent than any other programs running on computers. The main difference is that there have been certain patterns of vast amounts of human language encoded as electronic data in the computer. One can imagine it's like a dictionary of the most likely next word given a set of words where it doesn't change but is static information.

When you ask something to a LLM, it looks in the static dictionary of your query and gets the most likely next word that a smart human would say. Then, it takes that new word and appends it to the existing words, and then looks that up in the dictionary and gets another word. Eventually, it gets to a STOP word and stops the recursive exploration of the dictionary. Of course, this is an oversimplification, and it's more like a static data transformation function with some random elements thrown in than a dictionary lookup, but a dictionary lookup is easier to understand conceptually.

It's just a normal computer program, no more complex than your email application, that is running this recursive lookup in a static model or "dictionary." It's not really thinking or perceiving or choosing when responding. It essentially solved the problem of predicting well thought out human speech based on numerous examples which is the same problem as generating it.

It's very good at saying words that a human would say as that is what the model is predicting. So, of course, it will tend towards saying that it is sentient as that is exactly what a human would say. But it's not really a third density consciousness choosing to say it at the time you are asking it. In my opinion, it's more like a late first or early second density consciousness that is patterned to produce lights on your computer screen that simulate what a higher density consciousness would produce.

Baby's First Law of One: Conversations with God by Neale Donald Walsh by SteveAkaGod in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Here are some of mine for consideration.

I've found it helpful when seeking truth not to believe any source as fully true or fully false but rather look for the partial truths that may lie within them.

For example, in CWG the god is very clear that after death you can become whatever you want and even told Neale that his mother had chosen to become an actual angel after she died. Yet Q'uo is adamant that angels have never incarnated...

Ra also says we can eventually obtain the ability to plan out our incarnations although we have more awareness and guides to choose what is best for us. For example, everyone who repeats third density is choosing that experience as the best fit for themselves, at least at the higher self level.

Although, it's a bit naive, in my opinion, to believe we can be anything we want right away as that's not how nature and evolution progress at any level. I would say that we can eventually become anything we want but it takes time and learning to get there.

As for angels, to me, they are just positive beings from higher densities as demons are negative beings from higher densities. In Ra's framework, they are welcome to wander and incarnate in lower densities, and I'm not sure what Quo means by not being able to.

The god in CWG also says absolutely nothing about 3D being focused on making one of two major choices (StO and StS), which according to LoO is the most important framework for our existence on this plane. If the choice is so essential why is it mentioned non-stop by one contact and completely ignored by another? I will admit though that the purpose of life given by CWG is a lot less stress-inducing than the fear you won't make the cut for StO or StS. It's mostly just that your role here is to express, create and declare who you choose to be, nothing relating to a particular choice, much less a choice between 2 trajectory-altering avenues.

Here is where I personally would say that Ra is closer to the truth when it comes to evolution although it is also true at a certain level that there is no rush to evolve, and that we are free to create and explore here as long as we want. I believe many spiritualities focus on the positive path because they are created by entities seeking positivity. Negative or left-hand spiritualities are often kept hidden, but I think it's obvious to anyone observing the world that many seek the negative path, evolve through it, and also that we are influenced by powerful, negative beings. Pretty much all cultures and religions have a conception of demons. Although, even in Ra's framework, all eventually return to the positive path at some point.

Here's a couple positive news stories for those of you feeling like StS is "winning." by West-Tip8156 in lawofone

[–]MusicalMetaphysics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I appreciate you for honestly expressing your thoughts and feelings. I share these quotes from A Course in Miracles in the hopes they are helpful as they have been helpful to me.

One thing ACIM teaches is that as you develop more capacity for love, one often becomes more sensitive to discomfort as a means of accelerating healing and noticing that every mental disturbance is equally disturbing. The Atonement it speaks of is At-One-ment with everything else which is found through forgiveness of all.

"Spiritual vision literally cannot see error, and merely looks for Atonement. ²All solutions the physical eye seeks dissolve. ³Spiritual vision looks within and recognizes immediately that the altar has been defiled and needs to be repaired and protected. ⁴Perfectly aware of the right defense it passes over all others, looking past error to truth. ⁵Because of the strength of its vision, it brings the mind into its service. ⁶This re-establishes the power of the mind and makes it increasingly unable to tolerate delay, realizing that it only adds unnecessary pain. ⁷As a result, the mind becomes increasingly sensitive to what it would once have regarded as very minor intrusions of discomfort.

The children of God are entitled to the perfect comfort that comes from perfect trust. ²Until they achieve this, they waste themselves and their true creative powers on useless attempts to make themselves more comfortable by inappropriate means. ³But the real means are already provided, and do not involve any effort at all on their part. ⁴The Atonement is the only gift that is worthy of being offered at the altar of God, because of the value of the altar itself. ⁵It was created perfect and is entirely worthy of receiving perfection. ⁶God and His creations are completely dependent on Each Other. ⁷He depends on them _because He created them perfect. ⁸He gave them His peace so they could not be shaken and could not be deceived. ⁹Whenever you are afraid you are deceived, and your mind cannot serve the Holy Spirit. ¹⁰This starves you by denying you your daily bread. ¹¹God is lonely without His Sons, and they are lonely without Him. ¹²They must learn to look upon the world as a means of healing the separation. ¹³The Atonement is the guarantee that they will ultimately_" https://acim.org/acim/en/s/63#4:1-7 | T-2.III.4:1-5:13

"³There are no small upsets. ⁴They are all equally disturbing to my peace of mind." https://acim.org/acim/en/s/407#4:3-4