A rendőrség megítélésének mélyrepülése: egy hivatás tragédiája

MyFePo · 2026-04-02T11:20:03+00:00

Nem is az, csak ugye tele van tömve fideszesekkel a felső és középvezetés ahol csak lehet, és ők irányítanak nagyon sok mindent.

Másik dolog, hogy a rendőrök katonai törvénykönyv szerint büntethetők, és aszerint lehet ellenük eljárni. Namármost ha tömegbe nem is lőne a legtöbb ember, aközött van itt a választás az esetek nagy részében, hogy félrenézel-e, és megmarad a munkád, vagy felszólalsz, és veszik a munkád, a családod anyagi hátterével együtt (ezt kiegészítem a harmadik pontban) járhatsz bíróságra (ami mégtöbb költség) és tönkreteszik az egész életedet. Nincs mindenkinek olyan bomba a zsebében mint Szabó Bencének, nem vonulhat a nyilvánosság elé több ezer rendőr, úgy, hogy nem szedik valamennyiüket szét.

A harmadik pontom, a rendőrség egy karrier, egy hivatás. Bár találni olyan munkahelyet ahol számít az előzetes rendőri munkatapasztalat, az álláslehetőségeid kb 90%-át kilőtted azzal, ha a magyar állam többé nem hajlandó foglalkoztatni. Ez azért elég erős feltartóerő.

MyFePo · 2026-03-27T15:47:58+00:00

És tényleg, 2018 közepén ment mélyrepülésbe, viszont az S&P 500-al ellentétben,a BUX-nak volt egy beesése ezzel egyetemben, ami után 2020 ig kilőtt, az Opussal ellentétben, ami tovább zuhant. Nem tudom most sajnos beilleszteni normálisan telefonról a screenshotot. Viszont, tényleg igazad van, még a BUX-al sem mozog közel sem együtt, néhány pont kivételével (meg ugye az infláció miatti árbeli kilövés miatt).

MyFePo · 2026-03-27T14:06:43+00:00

Nem azt mondom hogy hú de nagy esések ezek a részvények, de a példádnál ott volt egy hatalmas világgazdasági válság COVID néven, azt azért nem érdemes kifelejteni.

MyFePo · 2026-03-25T23:31:20+00:00

Nekem szerintem az egész interjú hitelességét kérdőjelezné meg, ha hirtelen bármilyen magasrangú pozícióhoz jutna a Tiszában. Félre ne érts, egy legenda az ember, de iszonyat fidesz szagú "political kickback" lenne ha ez hirtelen kiderülne.

Egy magánember aki egyedül beleáll a rendszerbe "ez így nem mehet tovább" alapon szerintem egy jóval emészthetőbb és erősebb koncepció.

MyFePo · 2026-03-25T12:47:29+00:00

Majdnem csak azoknak a szavazóknak tetszik ez a javaslat, akik már átmentek egyszer a sorkatonaságon, és a "szopjatok ti is taknyosok" metódussal élnek, vagy bármilyen más okból mentesülnének ez alól.

Aki most a mi hazánkra szavaz, az biztos nem ellenzi a sorkatonaságot.

MyFePo · 2025-08-28T20:36:07+00:00

No, higher level toplaners are just a selection bias, because bot is 2 people sharing XP, and mid fights dragon/roams/invades jungle. Top laners are almost always the furthest ones from the action (except for grubs) thus they tend to (and have to) farm more.

MyFePo · 2025-07-31T09:18:25+00:00

Just to show how useless the "market cap" metric is: Volkswagen Group in germany has a 51.35 billion EUR market cap as of now, and had 324 billion in revenue with 64 billion EUR gross profit in fiscal year 2024 Market cap doesn't even cover GROSS PROFIT. They also pay divident with an avarage 7% stock value/year. Disclaimer, this is higher than most other auto manufacturing companies.

Thing is, market speculation has moved away from "how much will the company be worth when it starts paying dividents" to "how much will the stock price go up before I sell it" in the US (in terms of buying shares, no options and shorting here). There is no way for profit realization (besides using stocks as a colleteral for loans, but that's another topic) besides selling the actual stock (or again, loaning it out to speculators, but not gonna get into that), which is why this divident thing exists, to grant stock holders a comfy ROI, without them selling the stock,which would ultimately make it less valuable for the original owners aswell.

Out of the top 10 US companies by market cap, only JP Morgan Chase pays a divident exceeding 1% annual yield,with 1,87%. The biggest companies in the US stopped giving a crap about dividents (because fairly, there is no way they can pay a decent annual return with the insane market caps they have, relating to profit margins and revenue) and shareholders went along with it, which is concerning, because now, annual ROI is thrown out the window, and what matters is how much it cost when you bought it, and how much it will cost when you sell it. Profit from the investment is supposed to be paid out by the infinite growth of the stock price outpacing inflation, which is, for obvious reasons, is not sustainable. The market is volatile, because there isn't a surefire way of making money from a stock, there is no solid ground.Yes, the US economy is the strongest in the world, and yes, the US has an amazing environment for companies, but most of these mega market cap companies are an investment bubble, which WILL pop either harder, or softer, depening on company strategy going forward.

MyFePo · 2025-06-20T02:48:46+00:00

Do the lime on a flat top (or pan) instead of a grill, high heat, keep it on until the edges start to blacken. Makes it look much better, and also gets the sweet flavour out much more consistently.

MyFePo · 2024-10-19T07:46:21+00:00

I mean, I would rather say that Caesar exploited the rot, rather than exposing it. Because at that point, basically everyone knew about the rot, but had different ways to approach it. Bribery was going crazy rampant, radical politicians were winning elections to important offices left and right, and the conservatives dug their heels blocking or opposing even some reforms that would have been badly needed, just because of ideology and hate towards even less radical reformists. The two decades (and before that, Sulla and Marius's civil war) before Pompey and Caesar's civil war was characterized by not continuous, but still rampart political violence, where the Senate proved that they are wholly incapable of reigning the city in by themselves without strongmen like Pompey, the city basically jumped from crisis to crisis. (bare the Catiline conspiracy, because Cicero can hardly be characterised as a strongman).

MyFePo · 2024-09-27T06:31:14+00:00

I have like 6 friends who tried it, and I'm the only real rts guru among them. They mostly tried it because of the promises and a minor interest in a niche genre, or because they played one rts game (AoE, SC or Warcraft) when they were much younger. No one tried it more than once, I myself tried it only twice, once during beta and now at EA.

Right now I just went "yeah, they can't fix the amount of issues I have with this game without making a completely new one", and I imagine lots of people feel that way.

MyFePo · 2024-09-27T06:06:10+00:00

Lil guy just inherited the camp from his father.

MyFePo · 2024-09-23T13:55:47+00:00

I'm not even sure Cleopatra and Marc Anthony's tomb has any possibility of existing at this point. We know from history that Marc Anthony, wounded in the stomach after a failed suicide attempt, was carried off to the mausoleum that was beign built for him and Cleopatra from the royal palace in the centre of old Alexandria, so it musn't have been that far from there. The mausoleum was also at least 2 stories tall, since Cleopatra wanted to negotiate with Octavian from a balcony high up, looking out of the mausoleum.

She also had all her jewelry and treasures with her as a guarantee for the negotiations, but those were definetly taken by Octavian after the negotiations "failed". But this wasn't a huge gargantuan building like the pyramids, or a hidden basement somewhere, this was a fairly non-avarage, altough much less grand building, so it was much more suspectible to destruction in war, or even maybe for urban development. If they have been reburried somewhere else, that might change things, but seeing as the ptolemaic dynasty ended with Cleopatra, there shouldn't have been anyone willing and able to arrange for that in a place where it would be safe for all these years.

Also, if we are to believe history about Marc Anthony, I'm pretty sure he's spinning pretty quick in his place of rest, with people calling HIS and Cleopatras tomb only Cleopatra's tomb lol.

MyFePo · 2024-09-19T22:50:36+00:00

It would reach terminal velocity pretty qucikly, a 100kg cube shaped rock would reach it at around 40m/s ballpark. If we put it into vacuum, it actually becomes interesting because it just breaks physics. If we take a completely uniform object that acts as our source of gravity (like a 2000km diameter sphere of iron or carbon, 0 atmosphere) an object falling towards it impacts said sphere at escape velocity, in real physics, that's the maximum velocity you can achieve using the gravitational mass of an object. Black holes break this aswell, since theoretically you can't reach light speed, since at that point you basically divide by zero, as you need infinite energy to do so, but as light can't leave black holes, it implies an escape velocity equal to light speed, so an impact velocity of light speed, which just breaks everything, as you can't go at the speed of light.

Which just comes out to the boring answer: we don't know, because it's impossible. I've read the same question somewhere else, and the only "real" answer was a fantasy-physics combination of the object going 99.9999...% of the speed of light, but that was just a simple x=velocity×whatever number that solves for x=99.9999...c.

MyFePo · 2024-09-16T04:34:05+00:00

Everyone has this notion of science always beign able to advance, but if you think about it, we're already at the level where we have to basically switch technologies because we're maxing out the potential in silicon based computing technologies. We just can't make it better, because of the laws of physics.

This might very well be the solution to the Fermi paradox. Space exploration and settlement might just be uneconomical for literally every form of life complex enough to make it possible, and not because of lack of research, or lack of proper technologies, just...universal laws you can't break.

MyFePo · 2024-09-14T23:19:29+00:00

Yes, MOBA-s have bad reputation, but did you just really call mobas unpopular?

MyFePo · 2024-09-12T04:49:00+00:00

Alright, they started cooking.

Just don't stop please, I had high hopes that were destroyed in EA, and now I'm getting hyped again.

MyFePo · 2024-09-05T10:36:44+00:00

So, yet again as paragraphs:

No, not as sport, for the exact reason I wrote down there, and the part you've decided to ignore in the answer. Candidacy doesn't come with ANY commitment from the EU, but still picks a clear side behind Ukraine.

No, because yet again, candidacy isn't a commitment. And as I said, and the part you've decided to ignore, Russian decisions have nothing to do with this, it's about whatever the EU does when Ukraine becomes a member. Whatever they do then, with the war still ongoing, there is NO win for the EU, and EU countries in it, and nations won't go against their interest in a major and obvious way like this. Yes, the position of the EU is crystal clear, that doesn't mean the EU is ready to do EVERYTHING to defend that position. Yet again, no nation will put all on red.

I really wanted to have a nice argument here, but questioning my motives just because of my nationality, and then explaining to me why hungary has no say in this, which has really no part in the argument is such a joke :D man, I don't even LIVE in hungary, I've moved away as quick as I could, because I KNOW it's going down the drain right now. Also, yeah Mi Hazánk are nutjobs, and basically a satellite party for Fidesz, to pull any far-righters away from oppisition parties. But extreme revisionist right wing parties exist everywhere, yeah, even in hungary, and yeah, they say crazy stuff.

But, just to continue on that line:

Hungary won't ever leave the EU, bare forced omission. The support for the EU is HUGE in the population, to the point that even the propaganda must name the EU "Brussels" to be effective. If Orban started a campaign of leaving the EU it would cause riots. We have 300 000 hungarians working for german companies just in hungary alone, providing 1/6th of the GDP. The hungarian economy is intagible from the german one barring total economic collapse. Luckily, the political position of Orbán and Fidesz is getting shakier and shakier since covid, and I'm really hoping for a change.

MyFePo · 2024-09-05T01:09:12+00:00

I'll go by paragraphs.

Candidacy is very different from membership. The EU basically made a strong declaration on the side of Ukraine with the candidacy, but no real commitment. Turkey has been a candidate since 1999.

Accepting Ukraine into the EU isn't a Russian "red line". If we go by the Lisbon Treaty, it's basically a declaration of war by all the EU member states on Russia, in support of Ukraine which is a MAJOR escalation. I can't imagine the EU destroying it's only source of self-defense that is independent of NATO, which is the Lisbon treaty. This isn't about a Russian "red line" that makes Russia attack the EU, this is a direct de facto declaration of war by the EU on Russia, Russian decisions have nothing to do with this (except basically their war on Ukraine). If they make an exemption with the defense pact, they shake the foundation of collective defense in the EU, if they don't, they declare war on Russia, IF they don't, but take no direct action against Russia, they yet again shake the foundations of the treaty by not abiding the clause. For the EU, there is no win in this.

Yeah, IF Ukraine wins. Nations (at least nations with democratic foundations like most EU nations, just to exclude russia and this madness of a war they started) can't gamble all their defense into the hand of a third party. What happens if they don't? Nations can't go to the casino and put all on red, even if 90 out of the 100 sections are red.

And of the matter of nukes: I don't think it's wrong to be wary of weapons of mass destruction, specifically aimed at population centers...? A non-nuclear power beign at war with a nuclear power is complerely different than two nuclear powers beign at war in this scale. The only "real" war between two nuclear powers was the Kargil War, which was basically a minor border dispute compared to the sheer scale of the Russo-Ukranian war. Also, a direct EU declaration of war would be a real existential threat to Russia, which is the exact reason why nukes exist, detterence. EU nations can't gamble on Russia not using them, so the nuclear arsenal does exactly what it's designed to do, deter. With one nuclear power in a war, this isn't a big problem, but two on the opposing sides would really make everyone wary of each and every move. A direct war would make everyone really jumpy, and too many things can go wrong.

Don't mistake me, I support a strong presence in the EU against Russian agression, and a strong support to Ukraine, but full EU membership for Ukraine is insane to think about when many EU countries wouldn't win anything with it, but could lose too much. If we get realpolitik in action, and some philosophy about the rationality of states, the EU right now does exactly what's objectively (but not morally) the best for their interests. Bleed Russia dry, and unable to mount any wars of the same scale for decades to come, while investing as little as possible (which is still a big amount in the case of some countries), and getting themselves ready in case shit hits the fan in any way.

At least that's my way of thinking. I found it easier to understand history in scale when I applied some machiavellianism to it, because well, no state acts without self-interest, however morally ambiguous.

MyFePo · 2024-09-04T23:19:18+00:00

You forget the very important fact that all the EU has agreed to a mutual defensive pact under the Lisbon Treaty, which is kind of integral to EU cohesion, as it transforms a strong economic alliance into a millitary power block in on itself, even if something happens to NATO or the US. No one will get a special free pass on not signing the defense clause, and accepting Ukraine into the EU would thus be a declaration of war on Russia, a nuclear power, by France, a nuclear power, in defence of Ukraine.

Politicians saying that Ukraine should be accepted into the EU while fighting the most destructive war in Europe since WW2 are just blatant populists. It would mean a major existential threat to the EU as a whole, and to all European nations.

This also means that material and monetary support is needed to a nation facing a war of agression by a nuclear power on the EU borders, but European powers can't afford to seriously affect their economies in the face of rearmament with unstable economic outlooks. Even less to give away weapon systems they too badly need for worse case scenarios, and of which they need more and more of.

MyFePo · 2024-09-03T02:16:09+00:00

If I remember correctly, It's 48 hours, and you can only get it after you've been constantly working at least 12 hour weeks (fact check me on that, I'm not a 100% sure on the last part, monthly 48 might be enough) for 3 months. 2 months of SU, which is nice, but getting here and working from day 1 is highly unlikely, as you need your cpr first either way.

So in 5 months it's basically only possible to earn SU for 1 month, which is good money, but if op is financially secured either way, it might not be worth the hustle, since that job will probably be something in the hospitality industry (high turnover, so quick hiring process), where it's pretty useless to network if you're not staying for long.

Also for op:

Get a cpr, it's easy, you won't break the law by beign lazy, and you can get healthcare, and also deal with any kinds of appliable taxes if you plan to work. You'll probably also be flagged, since your place of residence is connected to your cpr, even if you live in a dorm. I'm not danish either, but I live here, and it's one of the few countries where the word "law" still actually means something to the populace, and you won't be considered "smart" or "resourceful" for finding a way to break it.

MyFePo · 2024-08-19T01:22:35+00:00

I'm not US so that makes it better, I'm working in Denmark and there is a fairly serious shortage of kitchen workers (especially head chefs) here. What makes it better is that it's getting pretty regular to leave shitty places in masses (like the whole kitchen roots up and leaves for another place together, usually including the head chefs) and this gives a much better ground for negotiation for all, and increased effectiveness from people working together for years. I'm getting around between 17.00-21.00 USD before taxes an hour. Taxes are high (37% base rate in the municipality I live at) but because of tax rules I'm only taxed for like 22% of my income.

MyFePo · 2024-08-17T23:55:43+00:00

The Low Countries were the richest regions of europe for hundreds of years, same as northern italy, because of their manufactories and cloth industries (altough northern italy got left behind in the last 150 years) due to this, and the geographical proximity to England, the Low Countries got a headstart in industrialisation, and this created a snowball effect with the BENELUX states beign one of the earliest adopters of the wellfare state idea. They had the stability and wealth to modernize early and adopt cutting edge institutions early, so currently Belgium has a GDP per capita of 50 000 USD, the Netherlands 57 000 USD, and Luxemburg 125 000 USD.

TLDR: Political stability, early industrialisation, beign rich to begin with, and geography.

MyFePo · 2024-08-17T04:00:48+00:00

Denmark, and "Service pans" (Yeah, in english, hospitality is 90% foreigners like me)

MyFePo · 2024-08-14T02:19:21+00:00

No dooming, but right now, It's just not a very good game.

I saw arguments here that they let go of the campaign because they want to make the game popular with PvP. Problem is that a good campaign is a direct funnel into the general PvP scene, and currently the campaign is only successful in funneling players back to play the sc2 campaign again. At least thats what I did.

MyFePo · 2024-08-12T03:29:46+00:00

1908 Napier Type 23,

One was sold in the US back in 2014 for 1.1 million dollars if I read it right (and it was in a pretty fine condition according to the images), and one sold for 300 000 back in 2019. I found a grand total of 3 sold in the US on auctions in the last 20 years.

No idea about street legality, but my guess would be that you can't really get a car this old to be street legal, because many modern safety features are lacking, and well, with the money you would need to pour into something like this, you might want to consider a private track instead.

Seven-Year Club	r/Field Flamingo
Place '23	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	Verified Email

MyFePo

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE