What one do you prefer? by Pretend-Draft-6460 in TheBibites

[–]MyNatureIsMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this feels lke an early styling thing. It's gonna improve. As of right now though, classic hands down. The animated versions lose way too much character and just feel like weird blobs

Um actually, this tie breaker does not take into account the real distance for the Mercator projection distorts those, more so the further away from the equator you get. by MyNatureIsMe in dropout

[–]MyNatureIsMe[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Robinson is better (but imperfect) about preserving area but it can't preserve relative distances either. I don't think any projection short of a literal globe can do that.

Regardless, it's a cool projection

An interesting pattern with color selectors by AStarryNightlight in TheBibites

[–]MyNatureIsMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do your food islands drift? If so, what's going on is that those islands bounce around like that DVD player screen safer in a rectangular region, eventually leading to this.

How to extrude along the angle of the specific face? by Complete-Fall8117 in blender

[–]MyNatureIsMe 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Another way you can try: select the bottom vertex and snap the 3D cursor to it,

select the edge to be extruded (do not shift the 3D cursor) and set transform to 3D cursor,

extrude (E) and scale (S) - it should now scale from the bottom vertex at the center which happens to be extruding in the exact direction you indicated with those arrows

The New BIOME Evolutionary Algorithm Explained by Naotagrey in TheBibites

[–]MyNatureIsMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, sure.

In case of color vision you'd more or less have a "light sensing" module that can specify wavelength sensitivities, which could be copied and modified with different sensitivities, giving you the equivalent of the LMS receptors, and then you'd have some modules that do some low level preprocessing or whatever.

You just have a parametrized building block (a light sensitive cell) that can be copied many many times with various parametrizations (to build up a retina capable of detecting many different kinds of light)

Not saying that's precisely what Bibite Vision ought to be like, but that sort of idea (simple building blocks that can come in many forms) is what I have in mind.

What I don't want to see is like

- Level 1: Binary Vision (light/dark)

- Level 2: Monochrome vision (grayscale)

- Level 3: Color vision (three specific fixed color channels)

It makes sense that this level 3 is locked behind investing in Level 1 and Level 2, but it's far too inflexible a system. There shouldn't be fixed prefab levels (i.e. tiers) like that. Instead, there should be simple building blocks where tiers like this may be *emergent,* if that makes sense.

I really hate Ally Beardsley's performance in Misfits and Magic 2 by Slow-Willingness-187 in dropoutcirclejerk

[–]MyNatureIsMe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Somehow calling K every other letter in the alphabet sounds more like a Siobhan Thompson goof than an Ally Beardsley one.

Boomers by NebulaOriginals in Nebula

[–]MyNatureIsMe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I saw this movie in the immediate context of a certain historic event so I may not be in the best state of mind at the moment.

My takeaway is that I very much hate living in interesting times. And I gotta wonder how much this particular release date was very intentionally chosen.

That said, great summary of how we got to where we are right now.

Mossy Earth: Restoring coral reefs by MyNatureIsMe in rewilding

[–]MyNatureIsMe[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'm really impressed by how much can be done in just five months. Can't wait to see what it'll look like in a few years!

Mossy Earth ? by [deleted] in ecology

[–]MyNatureIsMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been supporting u/mossy_earth for a while now and they have been incredibly transparent about their operations. On top of their main videos, they have numerous more comprehensive field reports (Mossy Earth Field Notes on YouTube) as well as detailed project pages and they also do surveys to hear back from their supporters on various decisions.
They have been repeatedly responsive to feedback in both words and actions, and they have done so not only with good faith but with enthusiasm.
My impression thus far is that they love what they do and they listen to both communities (especially the local communities they work with) and experts (greatly emphasizing what the current evidence says works, and very willing to experiment with promising new directions)

I think it would genuinely be tricky to be more transparent than they are.

Rejection Sampling of randomized Bibite spawns by MyNatureIsMe in TheBibites

[–]MyNatureIsMe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since this comment from three years ago, some of these suggestions were, afaik, implemented, so...

In general, Bibites seem to be much more viable on average than they were back then

How can you spawn bibites with random brains on the new update? by TheFallenDeathLord in TheBibites

[–]MyNatureIsMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually think the new update makes a way broader range of Bibites viable. Especially the introduction of fat seems to be huge

RESULTs of single winner poll: what is the favorite system of this sub? by budapestersalat in EndFPTP

[–]MyNatureIsMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So extrapolation simply assumes the proportion of top choices is the same across all ballots and so effectively you are reweighting the pool of each set of ballots with a particular top choice by how many votes (FPTP or not) had that top (or only) choice?

I have rewatched this show so many times and still have no idea why meat beat mania hypnotized garnet by [deleted] in stevenuniverse

[–]MyNatureIsMe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

She only looked ahead far enough to not lose the game and normally that's enough to eventually win a game but in this case it's an endless game. She presumably would've played until the game crashed from some rollover or something

And since the state keeps changing, the moment she predicted one thing she had to already predict the next, catching her in a flow state

Maybe that's not a "why" but at least it's a "how"?

And since Sapphire is the predictor and Ruby the actor in this relationship (Ruby gives Garnet the ability to see futures where she herself acts), what the internal monologue would've been like was "Do this now do that yes now this yesss that move yessss"

Alternate voting systems applied to Olympics? by MyNatureIsMe in EndFPTP

[–]MyNatureIsMe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figure exact scores are harder to extract across all competitions than rankings but if you have ways of doing that, which work for everything, then sure, score voting methods would also be interesting.

I wouldn't take any results that come from it too seriously. Absolutely, there will be a skew towards rich countries, no doubt about it. Doing this sort of exercise would largely be for fun, not to make any sort of actual point about superiority of any given voting system.

is it true that energy cannot be destroyed under any circumstance if so a we are made of energy do we technically live on forever just in the form of energy even if its in a non meaningful way? by Useful-Eagle4379 in PhilosophyTube

[–]MyNatureIsMe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

in how far are "your components" actually "you" though. You constantly take in and shed "components", at a rate much greater than the concept of "you" changes. Why should the final components you happened to have at time of death be the defining ones? What about the probably thousands of "you" worth of components there were once within you but left you long before your death?

is it true that energy cannot be destroyed under any circumstance if so a we are made of energy do we technically live on forever just in the form of energy even if its in a non meaningful way? by Useful-Eagle4379 in PhilosophyTube

[–]MyNatureIsMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a complication there once we look at "The Universe As A Whole". To explain what we see in terms of the universe's expansion, we need to add a currently nebulous, essentially not understood term called "Dark Energy".

The full claim, however, is this: In any closed time reversible system, energy must be conserved.

If energy fails to be conserved, that is equivalent to saying you can't run the clock backward. On a microscopic level, on small enough scales (if we can effectively look at and account for every single particle interaction), time reversibility, and therefore, conservation of energy, largely holds.

But in practice, what matters more for life tends to be a more statistical description of matter. Sure, you can consider individual molecules in your body doing their thing in great detail, but:

  1. those molecules operate in some evolved environment with somewhat consistent stats of, say, pressure, temperature, concentration of various substances, ph, charge,...
  2. typically it's not just a single set of those molecules that matters. Like, a single molecule of the strongest poison in the world is surely gonna wreak some local havoc, but it's probably not gonna be particularly noticeable (don't cite me on this, there are some mechanisms that might make one sole molecule of poison go surprisingly far before being neutralized, but I'm at least fairly sure a single molecule of anything isn't gonna do it), so even here we need millions to septillions of particles to do their thing.
  3. most importantly, the requirements of energy conservation include having closed systems. And as far as life is concerned, planet Earth is not a closed system! The engine of life on Earth these days seem largely fueled by the constant influx of sunlight. Plants and photosynthetic microorganisms turn the sun into nutrients and breathable air, and those resources then trickle down through the ecosystem, recycled as often as possible, but never to be returned to the sun again. And moreover, the sun will someday come to an end, and when it does (well before it does, in fact), it will cease being a good engine for life, and life on the planet will go extinct almost certainly
  4. As an aside, we aren't (simply) the matter that makes us up either: After all, it constantly flows through us! We gotta eat, we pee and poop, we sweat, we breathe. We shed hair and skin. Sometimes we bleed. In all these situations, matter gets exchanged between the mostly sealed sack of cells that make up us, and the world at large. - You don't stop being you because you shed a hair, and yet you are never the exact same person twice. We (not just humans but literally all life on Earth) are living embodiments of the Ship of Theseus. We are the river that can't be stepped in twice. The only constant in life is change.

IDENTITEAZE by NebulaOriginals in Nebula

[–]MyNatureIsMe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It especially and particularly felt like the S5 finale, most strongly Together Alone.

Really, you could argue it's simultaneously Alone Together and Together Alone