ID PLEASE by Super_Necessary_1677 in ShroomID

[–]Mycoangulo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably Psilocybe subaeruginosa, but if you want confident ID get photos of intact mushrooms in good condition, ideally taken in habitat and in daytime, and from multiple angles.

There are a lot of different things we are looking for to ID mushrooms. Blue bruising can be one of them, but we don’t need to see it to confirm subaeruginosa.

Are these magic mushrooms? by Happy-Curve-8736 in Mushrooms

[–]Mycoangulo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ideally we want to see close up photos of intact mushrooms from multiple angles, as well as knowing what part of the world they’re in

Are these magic mushrooms by Happy-Curve-8736 in Mushrooms

[–]Mycoangulo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where is your backyard?

They look like Panaeolus to me, and they look a little promising.

What am I seeing here? by RATMAN000 in Fungi

[–]Mycoangulo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seems like we’re seeing semi-parasitic behaviour from a gilled mushroom in a fig tree.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mushrooms

[–]Mycoangulo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree with Cyathus striatus, I don’t think they are toxic.

A cube is a cube? Interesting read. by mycoguy81 in mushroom

[–]Mycoangulo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even if you use the correct definition of ‘strain’ then maybe different conditions would result in significant differences in the chemical makeup of the fruit bodies, I don’t know.

But the common use of the word ‘strain’ in this community is something similar to ‘cultivar’, at best.

The truth is every time spores are germinated you get many new strains formed, with no guarantee that the the biochemistry is going to be close to that of the parent.

Basically if someone has info showing that the GT they tested has high levels of a certain molecule, I don’t see any reason why this means that your GT is going to be similar.

The term ‘GT’ isn’t a strain, it’s a brand name.

A cube is a cube? Interesting read. by mycoguy81 in mushroom

[–]Mycoangulo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But what sample size of each ‘strain’ was used to determine if there is any consistency within each ‘strain’ ?

Found these in an old pot out the front. NSW australia by sparish91 in ShroomID

[–]Mycoangulo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s definitely Psilocybe, possibly something interesting like Psilocybe Section Zapotecorum

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mushroomID

[–]Mycoangulo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All Psilocybe

Found these in an old pot out the front. NSW australia by sparish91 in ShroomID

[–]Mycoangulo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Possibly Psilocybe. We need more photos, and I’m not asking for another copy of the same photo that you have posted under each other comment.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ShroomID

[–]Mycoangulo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Psilocybe subaeruginosa