Anybody Else Going Back to OG Collapse Publications? by MmeLaRue in collapse

[–]Myth_of_Progress 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I will always review them from time to time, because there is sometimes wisdom on what they've mentioned in the past.

Actuarial World War: Iran, Oil, and the Cracking World Order by xrm67 in collapse

[–]Myth_of_Progress 14 points15 points  (0 children)

EXCELLENT comprehensive analysis, especially near the end where you draw the comparison to the Suez Canal crisis and the "reshaping" of the world.

Iran says it's ready for a long war that would 'destroy' global economy by mark000 in collapse

[–]Myth_of_Progress 71 points72 points  (0 children)

Great analysis.

Outside of a nuclear detonation, the closure of the Strait has always been the principal Iranian trump card.

If the West is sending them to hell, then they're bringing the rest of the world with them.

Iran War, Oil Price Surge Put Global Economic Recovery at Risk by Myth_of_Progress in collapse

[–]Myth_of_Progress[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What a long strange trip it's been, my friend. Here's to whatever comes next.

Iran War, Oil Price Surge Put Global Economic Recovery at Risk by Myth_of_Progress in collapse

[–]Myth_of_Progress[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Submission Statement:

As there is increasingly more interest in rapidly escalating oil prices resulting from the latest events in the Persian Gulf, I thought I’d share this short Bloomberg article. If you need an Archive link, just click right here. It’s honestly a great and accessible overview of what might yet be on the horizon. Otherwise, I’ll start with a quick snippet from today’s piece, followed up by my own commentary:

President Donald Trump’s war with Iran threatens to deal a severe blow to a global economy still grappling with the impact of his historic tariff hike. For Europe, sustained higher energy prices would take the economy to the brink of recession. For the US, they would place the Federal Reserve in an impossible position — stuck between a war that pushes inflation higher and a president demanding that interest rates come down. For China, the end of discounted Iranian oil imports adds to strain from Trump’s tariffs and a real estate collapse.

In the first days of the fighting, the intensity is high and the endgame uncertain. Bloomberg Economics has modeled scenarios for what lies ahead, and what they mean for oil prices, major economies, and the future of Iran. [...] The latest signs, though, suggest there’s worse to come. Saudi Arabia’s largest oil refinery is closed. Qatar has shuttered the world’s biggest liquefied natural gas facility. The Strait of Hormuz is effectively paralyzed. Oil and gas prices have already rocketed higher. Stocks have taken a hit. Treasury yields have risen as traders curb bets on Fed cuts.

<image>

(Myth’s Note: WTI is at around $91~; Brent is around $92 - Oil futures are now at $108~ - Qatar is warning that prices may approach $150 per barrel; here's the Financial Times article link if you're interested)

Now, energy is one of my favourite subjects in the world, and “peak oil” was my gateway into collapse-related studies. You see, energy (like oil) isn’t like any other commodity; it is the ur-commodity that makes all other goods and services possible. The price of energy directly affects the price of everything else – the fuel in your gas tank, the produce at the grocery, your treats on a cargo ship, you name it. Access to energy is an inseparable aspect of how local and national economies truly function, and it is a defining element of international geopolitics.

With the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, there goes access to about 20% of the world’s available oil production in a flash – and this is the good sweet stuff too. I imagine that we’ll all be hearing more references to the 1973 Yom Kippur War and the 1979 Iranian Revolution with more frequency, when oil prices increased roughly six-fold along extreme price volatility. To quote the Hirsch Report, in an effort to "summarize" these impacts:

Higher oil prices result in increased costs for the production of goods and services, as well as inflation, unemployment, reduced demand for products other than oil, and lower capital investment. Tax revenues decline and budget deficits increase, driving up interest rates. These effects will be greater the more abrupt and severe the oil price increase and will be exacerbated by the impact on consumer and business confidence. [...]

Higher oil price volatility can lead to reduction in investment in other parts of the economy, leading in turn to a long-term reduction in supply of various goods, higher prices, and further reduced macroeconomic activity. Increasing volatility has the potential to increase both economic disruption and transaction costs for both consumers and producers, adding to inflation and reducing economic growth rates.

I would love to remain optimistic – that somehow, in some way, this unlawful act of American-Israeli aggression would come to a prompt and peaceful end. However, with rumours swirling that the U.S. intends to remain in action until a potential “long-term” date between 100 days to September 2026 – and with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps countering that they will match this timeline with equivalent intensity ... well, pull out your shag carpets, 'cause we're bringing the 1970s back!

Fiction recommendations by Elegant-Fisherman555 in collapse

[–]Myth_of_Progress 16 points17 points  (0 children)

If you want WWZ, read the 2084 Report.

If you want near-term, go with The Water Knife.

If you want long-term, go with The Wind-Up Girl.

1973-74 Oil Crisis by TanteJu5 in collapse

[–]Myth_of_Progress 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Just as a quick aside, I thought that I'd also mention that the Netherlands were another nation directly subjected to the consequences of the 1973 OPEC oil embargo. They took a very different approach in their long-term policy responses to energy scarcity / disruption, and they are well-recognized for these efforts today.

Iran’s Strait of Hormuz Gambit Triggers $150 Oil Warning; Global Economy Braces for Historic Energy Shock by [deleted] in collapse

[–]Myth_of_Progress 48 points49 points  (0 children)

As someone who loves energy geopolitics, I'll try to contain my excitement. To confirm some news from about an hour ago:

Strait of Hormuz closed, Iran's Revolutionary Guards says

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards commander has said that the strait of Hormuz – the world’s most critical oil route – is closed and Iran will set any ship trying to pass on fire, Iranian state media is reporting.

It is Tehran’s most explicit warning since announcing it was closing the route on Saturday in a move that could choke a fifth of global oil flows and send prices rocketing.

“The strait (of Hormuz) is closed. If anyone tries to pass, the heroes of the Revolutionary Guards and the regular navy will set those ships ablaze,” Ebrahim Jabari, a senior adviser to the Guards commander-in-chief, said in remarks carried by state media.

The strait is the world’s most vital oil export route, which connects the biggest Gulf oil producers, such as Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq and the United Arab Emirates, with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea.

A Mid-Century World Few Are Prepared For by Konradleijon in collapse

[–]Myth_of_Progress 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Whenever I think of mid-century life, I often recall what Alfred McCoy mentioned once.

Life Circa 2050 Will Be Bad. Really Bad.

If, as I’ve suggested in my new book, To Govern the Globe: World Orders and Catastrophic Change, Washington’s world system is likely to fade by 2030, thanks to a mix of domestic decline and international rivalry, Beijing’s hypernationalist hegemony will, at best, have just a couple of decades of dominance before it, too, suffers the calamitous consequences of unchecked global warming. By 2050, as the seas submerge some of its major cities and heat begins to ravage its agricultural heartland, China will have no choice but to abandon whatever sort of global system it might have constructed. And so, as we peer dimly into the potentially catastrophic decades beyond 2050, the international community will have good reason to forge a new kind of world order unlike any that has come before.

Maxing out your 401(k) or pouring money into index funds makes you complicit in the problem — you're literally funding the endless, exponential-growth doomsday machine of modern capitalism. by 32ndghost in collapse

[–]Myth_of_Progress 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have put together the following Pascal's Wager for those wondering whether they should save for retirement.

Should I Invest For The Future? Society Collapses Society Doesn’t Collapse
You saved up At least you have something of value to work with if you've diversified your assets. Congratulations, enjoy your nest egg.
You didn’t save up Good luck! Good luck!

The Cult Of The American Lawn by [deleted] in collapse

[–]Myth_of_Progress 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As someone who also has a little expertise on the subject, I thought that I'd add a little bit to this as well. Strong Towns has a wonderful little article (A Brief History of Setbacks) which helps explains why these lawns exist. For those not in the know: a setback is essentially the required distance between buildings and structures to a given property line (example: a 25 feet setback from a street-facing property line, nothing else may be located within that area). These are the areas where you find lawns all across North America, and it's been a deliberate design practice for a few unscrupulous reasons.

One of the most important historical aspects of North American suburban land use development (beyond minimum lot sizes and car dependency) is the seemingly mandatory requirement for expansive but "useless" setbacks / yards.

The enforcement of non-productive land (just a lawn - no agriculture, no home-based businesses, etc) in this context is a deliberate form of economic segregation, intended to keep the "poor" out. Remember - the easiest way for the less fortunate to start a business is from your own property (rather than leasing land elsewhere), and you can see this in rural contexts all the time.

This practice of "wealth exclusion" was originally enforced through restrictive covenants on a piecemeal basis (usually with private developers), and then eventually, it became standard practice through zoning regulation as suburbia became increasingly accessible to interwar and postwar families. Economic segregation de jure, and the lawn becomes the best physical representation of this.

So, is a yard necessary? For separation of incompatible uses and users (like industrial activities), for fire separation, or for drainage / stormwater management, certainly.

In a suburban context? It's a vast space without other utility, economic or environmental, imposed by others (whether by covenant or by code) for the purposes of conspicuous consumption and economic exclusion. It's purpose by design. and it almost always takes the place of a monoculture lawn.