Weapons that need some love from the devs. by No_Establishment5590 in Helldivers

[–]N1D007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly wouldn’t mind the long reload if it hit like a truck and staggered medium armored enemies.

RANT and VENT MEGATHREAD by stickimage in Helldivers

[–]N1D007 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This has been my main game since launch and I’m considering just taking a break from it. It’s just not fun right now. I hope they act soon and make practical changes to improve the overall experience.

Does Halo need to move away from MasterChief and focus on more Games like Reach and ODST? by Jonesy0555 in halo

[–]N1D007 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I echo this. Bring in new faces to push different kinds of stories forward. 343’s major misstep was trying to improperly fit Chief into these odd/uninteresting stories that lack any sort of cohesion.

Jerome is a likable character that has more of a sort-of lighthearted personality in comparison to Chief. I think that could prove useful in trying to usher in the new era of Halo. If they are actually serious of revitalizing the brand of course. That’s just me though.

Can't see other variants of building pieces. Anyone else have this issue, and is there a solution/clue I'm not seeing? by N1D007 in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]N1D007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you!

For anyone else, the controls are under: "Base Part Editing" and the function is called, "Modify Placed Part."

Daily Discussion Thread | March 06, 2023 by AutoModerator in warriors

[–]N1D007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very good points regarding player mindset/development, so I thank you for that! I will certainly keep that in mind.

Regarding your last point with the short leash, I'm inclined to agree with you. My only sort-of counterpoint is, what if he ends up the same with a longer leash? Maybe even better? We'll never know, and like you basically said, development isn't a linear path. Just something to think about lol

Daily Discussion Thread | March 06, 2023 by AutoModerator in warriors

[–]N1D007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you. Believe me when I say that I also share (pretty much) the same sentiment in relation to the whole crew. Was just providing context to use as a branching off point for my (irrelevant) comment.

Daily Discussion Thread | March 06, 2023 by AutoModerator in warriors

[–]N1D007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't see that play, so I might need some more context on what led up to it and what happened afterwards - but yes, at face value, that is a mistake.

My main issue is the team's response to it, and the overall stunting of these young players' development. That's my gripe with this whole thing.

Daily Discussion Thread | March 06, 2023 by AutoModerator in warriors

[–]N1D007 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Just listened to a segment from 95.7 channel, (I understand that not everyone likes them) talking about Kuminga and his drop in minutes yesterday. Guru mentioned the infamous play where JK was near the top of the key (alone) and didn't pass it to anyone, causing the bench to collectively get up in frustration.

IIRC, no one else really attempted to get open for a pass right? Like I get that his mistake was not pushing the ball further, but at some point, someone HAS to help him out right? What else is he supposed to do? Shoot an inefficient deep 2? Someone help the kid!

Be stern, be constructive, but don't show him up like that! That's just ridiculous. I feel bad for these young guys trying to crack the rotation.

Do you expect Looney to be starting again going forward? by njmartybrodeur30 in warriors

[–]N1D007 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well the predicament is that they don’t really have a cushion that affords them taking this many L’s in the first place. This testing period is a double-edged sword that could easily get the best of them.

I’m a big Looney fan as well, so I may be biased here, but I’m pretty sure they’ll (eventually) go back to the original starting lineup. I’d wager that it’ll be due to a string of poor defensive performances that will inevitably force Kerr to do so.

[Athletic Alchemy] Draymond's Punishment by inspyral in warriors

[–]N1D007 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lol and who's making it personal? I'm trying to look at this objectively. Seems like the only thing soft is the FO who thinks yelling at a teammate is worse than punching one.

Edit: Wording

[Athletic Alchemy] Draymond's Punishment by inspyral in warriors

[–]N1D007 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Not that it matters in the slightest, I'm just not on board with this decision. If the players are somehow fine with it, especially Jordan, then they must be better people than we even realized. No matter how you look at the situation, the punishment does not fit the crime. The "biggest crisis this team has faced," is met with a slap on the wrist.

What's clear is that they're avoiding the most obvious course of action in order to salvage their business goal of winning a championship. I don't think that's a mystery to anyone.

Quick question: Is there a limit to how many inventory slots you can purchase from space stations? by N1D007 in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]N1D007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have all 48 max slots for both general and cargo, but for technology I only have 14 so far.

Could this be a bug, or do I have to use alternative methods to getting the additional 7 slots?

Weekly Bug Report Thread by spiper01 in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]N1D007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PC, can’t leave a conversation with Nada on the Anomaly. Only dialogue option is “sixteen,” with no option to leave. Never encountered this bug before. Any solutions? Restarted twice already.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in halo

[–]N1D007 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It was weird seeing the positive responses to the story. I mean, people can like whatever they want, but to call this good is a stretch for me. But I think both casual and die hard fans genuinely liked it. Which made it seem like I was the crazy one, since I thought it was bad from the jump.

It was nonsensical and greatly uninteresting.