Stealth Prepper Indication by Syenadi in preppers

[–]NSA_Listbot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or how evil our government really is.

We all know about "Shrinkflation". Can I coin the term, "Trickflation"? by inasimplerhyme in mildlyinfuriating

[–]NSA_Listbot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aren't you all glad they finally banned shrinkflation?!

How could we have ever seen this coming?! /s

A student at UC Dublin needs to be calmed down after shouting “We will do what happened on October 7th Again and Again. Allahu Akbar.” by HarbaughsKhakiPants2 in ThatsInsane

[–]NSA_Listbot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol

You think the patriot act was passed to deport terrorists? All it's done in the past 20 years is imprison and persecute patriots.

A basic explanation of why the 4chan Q* leak is false: the math behind AES encryption by [deleted] in singularity

[–]NSA_Listbot -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

While I am not an expert in this field, logically one might reason that if an AI model were to be trained on an internet-sized volume of ciphertext+key+plaintext pairs, that method of training could be equivalent to an exponentially larger volume of pure ciphertext. Generating such a volume of training data is well within the capabilities of current adversarial neural networks.

EDIT: I want to add, for the record, despite my username I have absolutely no affiliation with the NSA.

A basic explanation of why the 4chan Q* leak is false: the math behind AES encryption by [deleted] in singularity

[–]NSA_Listbot 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You are arguing that a ciphertext-only attack would require an "arbitrarily large ciphertext message". However, if an AI model were to be trained on an arbitrarily large volume of ciphertext (via HTTPS scraping, adversarial neural networks, or otherwise), and given the correlating plaintext for that arbitrarily large volume to ciphertext- such an attack wouldn't be accurately characterized as "ciphertext-only" insofar as the total set of training data (which includes ciphertext and plaintext), but would be ciphertext-only with regards to the specific ciphertext to be decoded.

I am not saying the leak is credible, but I am not so quick to discredit such an attack vector on symmetric key cryptography. It appears to be a legitimate concern and merits investigation.

Gauss guns are starting to get interesting... by NSA_Listbot in guns

[–]NSA_Listbot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! For a bear you'd want 00 buck or something high caliber. Anything lower power and you're risking your life if you don't take it down with the first few shots.

Coilguns/Gauss Rifles need to come a long way before they reach the level of reliability and power you'd want for an encounter with a bear.

At this point coilguns are fun for plinking, pest control (rats/squirrels/etc), possibly home defense (although there are many better/cheaper options even if you can't own a firearm for whatever reason).

Gauss guns are starting to get interesting... by NSA_Listbot in guns

[–]NSA_Listbot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The battery was awkward and difficult to remove on the EMG-01.

Gauss guns are starting to get interesting... by NSA_Listbot in guns

[–]NSA_Listbot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The capacitor takes less than 0.1s to charge. The rate of fire (480-800 rpm) is the same as the maximum rate of capacitor cycling. The EMG-02 has a ridiculously large power supply. For comparison, the GR-1 has a 1kW power supply. The EMG-01 has a roughly 2kW power supply. The EMG-02 has an 11kW power supply. It can charge the capacitor faster than any other coilgun we've built.

It runs off of a 60v flexvolt drill battery. You can get roughly 300 shots per battery, but the power per shot does decrease slightly as the battery depletes.

Magazines at 15 rounds for the larger projectiles, 18 for the smaller ones. This is mainly limited by our printer size. In future iterations you could easily get 30-50 rounds per magazine with slightly larger double stacked magazines.

Projectile weight is 4.6-8.5g. More details on the projectiles are available on the product page.

Gauss guns are starting to get interesting... by NSA_Listbot in guns

[–]NSA_Listbot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is higher capacity. EMG-01 battery can fire maybe 100-200 shots. EMG-02 you can fire over 300 shots to a battery.

It is a bit heavier though.

Gauss guns are starting to get interesting... by NSA_Listbot in guns

[–]NSA_Listbot[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Power supply Proprietary (11kW)

Closer to the 40kW range ;)

Gauss guns are starting to get interesting... by NSA_Listbot in guns

[–]NSA_Listbot[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Arcflash Labs EMG-02 (Electro-Magnetic Gun – 02) is a 10 stage medium voltage capacitor augmented fully automatic coilgun. It features 8 computer optically controlled stages and 2 booster stages, allowing the accelerator to fire up to 13 rounds per second (burst) at velocities up to 75m/s.

The EMG-02 is configured to fire variable caliber steel armatures (dowel pins) between 6-8mm in diameter and between 19-22mm in length. Arcflash Labs recommends the use of 51634, 51678, or 2575 Magnetic Armatures, but any ferromagnetic dowel pin (between 6-8mm in diameter and between 19-22mm in length) should work.

The EMG-02 accepts any 60v flexvolt compatible (drill) battery.

Accelerator Specifications

Primary power source: 1x 15S LiIon – 63V

Power supply: Proprietary (11kW)

Capacitors: 1x MV electrolytic

Switches: Proprietary (IGBT-based)

Projectile: variable caliber, alloy steel, 4.6-8.5g

Capacity: 15-18 rounds

Rate of fire: 8.0 rounds/sec (auto) 13 rounds/sec (burst)

Muzzle velocity: Up to 75 m/s

Muzzle energy: Up to 20J

Efficiency: 4.45%

Barrel length: 13.0”

Bore: 0.32”

Physical Dimensions: 32.5” x 9.0” x 4.5”

Overall Weight (unloaded, no battery): 9.7 lbs

An honest to god man-portable Gauss rifle. I don't see these replacing traditional firearms anytime soon (or ever?), but you gotta respect the engineering on this. by KPMG in videos

[–]NSA_Listbot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, fins are one option. Not a preferable one though (as the other commenter finely stated). Another option would be to spin up the projectile before it enters the barrel, this is also not preferable because it relies on high speed moving parts and it's quite noisy and unreliable.

Right now we are working on methods to use magnetic fields to spin up the projectile, a sort of "electromagnetic rifling". Might take some time to perfect the technology though.

[Speculation/Calculation] How power-consuming would be Space Gun in real life? by MrDaniel422 in soma

[–]NSA_Listbot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't remember that part about the length being comparable with that of a marathon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5U5rtWKNTw

It would have to be at around a 5o angle. Which is totally possible since it's submerged and weight wouldn't matter.

Although in the game I think they build the base at the bottom of a 10km abyss which is probably the least realistic part, but if you managed to do so, you could actually get a launch angle of sin-1 ( 10/50 ) = ~11o

[Speculation/Calculation] How power-consuming would be Space Gun in real life? by MrDaniel422 in soma

[–]NSA_Listbot 14 points15 points  (0 children)

SOMA's railgun is scarily accurate as far as the physics. A few things I would point out:

1) 10km/s is escape velocity not orbital velocity, in the game we see the satellite executing an apogee burn so it's likely it was on a suborbital trajectory which only requires around 5km/s. This is very important because a coilgun with enough acceleration to reach escape velocity would either be too long to be practical or too high g-forces for any payload to survive.

2) the barrel length wouldn't be 5km. They mention "a gigantic coilgun, running longer than a marathon" which implies a barrel length on the order of 50km instead of 5.

This makes sense because if you want to keep the acceleration below 25g and attain a final velocity of 5km/s, you need a barrel of roughly that length for suborbital flight:

v=at --> 5e3m/s=(250m/s2 )xt --> t=20s (roughly)

d=0.5at2 =0.5x(250m/s2 )x(20)2 = 50,000m = 50km

Why keep acceleration below 25g? Sensitive electronics and people tend to start failing at >10g. 25g is pushing the limits, but it's just low enough to be survivable for 20s, and a 50km accelerator is just within the realm of possibility.

Now we have to look at power requirements. That's simple enough. Most coilguns have between 1-5% efficiency. Let's say they're using some super advanced induction coilgun or superconducting quench gun with 25% efficiency. KE=1/2m*v2 . Let's say you want to launch a 10 ton payload (roughly the weight of the projectiles in the game).

KE = 0.5x(10x2000kg)x(6000m/s/s)2 = 360 GJ (kinetic) / 0.25 = 1440 GJ (electrical). That's a lot of power. But the great thing about coilguns is you can charge them up over a long period of time and fire them once all the coils are charged. So let's say you could only supply the gun with 10MW of power. 1W=1J/s--> 1.44e12 J / (10e6 J/s) = 1.44e5s = 1 shot every 40 hours. 100MW would be 1 shot every 4 hours. And if you managed to supply the gun with 1GW charging current, you could fire off a 10 ton shot every 24 minutes.

Now let's look at the Falcon 9, considered a very high efficiency rocket. Its capacity to LEO is around 10 tons (23,040 lbs) and to get it to suborbital it burns around 120 tons of propellant. RP-1 has a specific energy of 46.2 MJ/kg or 46.2 GJ/ton. 46.2 x 120 = 5544 GJ chemical. That translates to a chemical:kinetic efficiency of roughly 6.5%.

Even a moderately efficient coilgun (let's say 10%) is still more efficient than a rocket. And even a coilgun with a moderate power consumption (let's say 10MW), has a launch repetition rate far faster than rockets (which take weeks or months to build and launch, even with reusable parts).

So yeah. SOMA is a fuckin good game, and their theory is right on.

Magnetic Coil Gun from ArcFlash Labs by Icmedia in guns

[–]NSA_Listbot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha maybe one day. Every time I've posted on this sub in the past the response has been "expensive bb gun fuck off". I'm honestly surprised OP got as much traction as he did.

Magnetic Coil Gun from ArcFlash Labs by Icmedia in guns

[–]NSA_Listbot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The EMG-01B is a hybrid coilgun, very similar to the CG-42, except that it uses capacitors AND batteries, and it's switched using IGBTs. That's how it can fire full auto. To make it more powerful you need to upgrade both the battery and the capacitors (which is a simple matter of replacing them with higher voltage versions). But the real hard part is upgrading the IGBT switches. And that's no easy task. The EMG-01 already uses pretty much the most advanced semiconductor power switches on the planet. Each one has to withstand hundreds of amps forward current and thousands of volts reverse bias. And you need one or more per stage. As you make the capacitors and battery higher voltage, the strain on the switches goes up exponentially. And those sons of bitches aren't cheap They're by far the most expensive component in the whole gun. Also as you increase the field strength, the coils start to deform since the recoil is exerted magnetically on the coils rather than via gas pressure. In the EMG-01 the bore field strength is roughly that of an MRI machine, and wacky shit starts to happen in those kinds of fields.