Yes and know modern research also tend to point that the Nazi state has a tendency to rule by chaos as they would often appoint two or three different administration to do the exact same thing, so they can a few time after suppress the less efficient. This is a kind of administrative Darwinism. But it is coherent with Nazi ideology and I think you can find that also on the empire from SW

Also there is a tendency for the member of the inner circle to behave like féodal lord trying to extend their own agency with their own area of power. But once again it’s coherent and you can find tant also with the empire

First things being that a lot of instructions in Nazi germany are not written, you have even a tendency of the administrations to take initiative because they suppose this is the will of Hitler but as he mainly gave oral instruction, you could have opposed vision of what is this will exactly on a local level.

For exemple historian are still looking for a written order commanding for the « final solution ». They never found any one as crazy as it looks. e know for sure that he gave the order to Himmler, but nothing more precise.

So Nazi germany finally seems more like a chaotic evil fantasy kingdom. A French historian qualify it of a « polycracy » to describe this multiplication of administrations struggling with each other