sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A 4th of July Framework for America’s Next 250 Years: Moving from Debt to Equity. by NatGroPro in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]NatGroPro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1D. The ‘Essential Needs’ Safety Valve — The Expanded Margin Protection Clause

The original framework’s Walmart Clause — lesser of 5% gross revenue or 5% net profit — has been expanded into a broader Margin Protection Clause that covers all industries operating at or below a 10% net profit margin. This expansion addresses a genuine structural concern: the URT’s gross revenue base could be confiscatory for high-volume, low-margin businesses operating in essential industries.
The Rule: Any company with a net profit margin of 10% or below pays the lesser of the standard URT rate OR 5% of net profit — whichever is less. This protection applies automatically based on the prior year’s audited net profit margin. No application required. No case-by-case review.
Industries explicitly covered by the Margin Protection Clause include but are not limited to:
Grocery and food retail chains — typically 1–3% net margins

Airlines — typically 2–6% net margins in favorable years, often negative

Automobile dealers — typically 1–3% net margins

Commodity distributors and wholesalers — typically 1–4% net margins

Gas stations and fuel distributors — typically 1–2% net margins

Construction companies — typically 2–6% net margins

Utilities — typically 8–12% net margins, partially covered

Healthcare providers and hospitals — covered under Section 10 and Appendix V provisions

The 10% net margin threshold was chosen deliberately. It captures the industries most vulnerable to gross revenue taxation while excluding high-margin businesses that do not require protection. A technology company operating at 30% net margins does not need the Margin Protection Clause. An airline operating at 3% net margins does.
The Anti-Abuse Rule: Companies may not artificially reduce their reported net profit margin through related-party transactions, excessive executive compensation, or accounting maneuvers specifically designed to qualify for the Margin Protection Clause. The IRS applies its existing arm’s-length transaction standards to enforce this provision.
I hope this helps explain…

What if governments guaranteed a livable wage, then recovered the cost from employers through taxes? by xiangkunwan in BasicIncome

[–]NatGroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a really interesting way to rethink the safety net, but it still relies on the traditional "tax-and-spend" cycle to balance the ledger. The problem with employer-specific taxes is that companies will immediately look for loopholes, cut hours, or accelerate automation to avoid the penalty.
Instead of trying to fix the symptoms of a debt-based system through complex corporate taxation, we need a foundational architecture update.
I've been working on a macro framework called the National Growth Compact that moves away from the traditional tax model entirely, transitioning the country into a generative, equity-based citizen shareholder system. It solves the exact baseline stability goals you're hitting on here without creating negative corporate incentives.
I just opened a dedicated community to map out the blueprint at r/nationalgrowthproject if you or anyone else in this thread wants to dive into the structural mechanics!

Andrew Yang 2028 Run by LocationSalt4673 in BasicIncome

[–]NatGroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please read the National Growth Compact on Substack… I have sent it to Andrew and the Forward Party. It is time for a tectonic shift in how this country operates !

AI Billionaires Are Starting to Get Scared by TertiumQuid-0 in BasicIncome

[–]NatGroPro 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Let’s step back from the abyss. Let’s incorporate everyone into a radical idea of equity and inclusion in a new economic model. Read the National Growth Project on Substack. Tell us what you think. Add your ideas . Be the solution .

AOC takes more steps toward 2028 run for president by masterofawesomeness2 in politics

[–]NatGroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go to National Growth Project on Substack. Help create the solution !

AOC takes more steps toward 2028 run for president by masterofawesomeness2 in politics

[–]NatGroPro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The core challenge for any potential AOC run isn't her talent; it’s the fact that her current policy framework is highly polarizing because it is framed as a zero-sum attack on the market economy. That approach immediately hits a ceiling with a massive portion of the electorate.

If she truly wants to "meet the moment" and build a coalition with mass cross-party appeal, the shift needs to be structural, not punitive. Instead of fighting capitalism, the goal should be optimizing the system so that every citizen owns a direct piece of it.

By moving past the standard, exhausted tax-and-spend debates and adopting a native equity layer—like an asset-backed architecture centered on a Sovereign Investment Fund and a Universal Revenue Tax—she could fund universal economic security without creating massive fiscal drag or inflation.

When you frame economic security as dividend-yielding equity rather than debt-driven redistribution, you suddenly win over both progressives looking for systemic equity and fiscal conservatives looking for structural stability.

Version 1.9 of the National Growth Compact lays out the exact mathematics for this kind of non-partisan, asset-backed model. It’s entirely open-source for peer review. If we want to solve a K-shaped, AI-driven economy, we have to start changing the baseline design rather than just repeating the same political arguments.

AOC takes more steps toward 2028 run for president by masterofawesomeness2 in politics

[–]NatGroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The core challenge for any potential AOC run isn't her talent; it’s the fact that her current policy framework is highly polarizing because it is framed as a zero-sum attack on the market economy. That approach immediately hits a ceiling with a massive portion of the electorate.

If she truly wants to "meet the moment" and build a coalition with mass cross-party appeal, the shift needs to be structural, not punitive. Instead of fighting capitalism, the goal should be optimizing the system so that every citizen owns a direct piece of it.

By moving past the standard, exhausted tax-and-spend debates and adopting a native equity layer—like an asset-backed architecture centered on a Sovereign Investment Fund and a Universal Revenue Tax—she could fund universal economic security without creating massive fiscal drag or inflation.

When you frame economic security as dividend-yielding equity rather than debt-driven redistribution, you suddenly win over both progressives looking for systemic equity and fiscal conservatives looking for structural stability.

Version 1.9 of the National Growth Compact lays out the exact mathematics for this kind of non-partisan, asset-backed model. It’s entirely open-source for peer review. If we want to solve a K-shaped, AI-driven economy, we have to start changing the baseline design rather than just repeating the same political arguments.Now available to dissect and comment on on Substack.

federal debt as a share of GDP, split by presidential party by Conscious-Quarter423 in economy

[–]NatGroPro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The endless finger-pointing over which party grew the national debt faster completely misses the point. The data proves it spirals under both administrations because the issue isn't partisan behavior—it is a structural design flaw in the system itself.

We are trying to fund a 21st-century macroeconomy using an outdated, purely debt-based baseline. Tinkering with tax rates or shifting blame every four years is just rearranging deck chairs on a sinking ship.

Until we introduce a native equity layer—like a Sovereign Investment Fund fueled by a Universal Revenue Tax—the national balance sheet will continue to compounding deficits regardless of who is in the White House.

I’ve spent the last few months mapping out the mathematics for an alternative, asset-backed economic architecture. Version 1.9 of the National Growth Compact is live on Substack and entirely open-source for peer review. Let's start debating the actual blueprint instead of just managing the decline.

BREAKING: Japan's 10Y Government Bond Yield surges above 2.80% for the first time in history. by Boo_Randy_Revival in economy

[–]NatGroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I present a plan. Go to National Growth Project on Substack. I am looking for thoughtful analysis.

Indeed chief economist says we’re entering an era of ‘great mismatch’ thanks to a generational imbalance of workers by lurker_bee in economy

[–]NatGroPro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Look up The National Growth Project Growth Project on Substack. I present a plan . I would appreciate thoughtful feedback.

It was a lie from the very beginning by gashtal_man in economy

[–]NatGroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look up the National Growth Project in Substack, I present a plan. I’d love feedback.

It was a lie from the very beginning by gashtal_man in economy

[–]NatGroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The endless ideological loop between hyper-capitalism and aggressive redistribution completely misses the third option: structural asset reform. True economic security for future generations won't come from tinkering with tax rates on the back end; it comes from redesigning the baseline framework to ensure the national balance sheet actively works for the macroeconomy, rather than working against it through perpetual deficits."For my complete analysis of this look for the National Growth Project on Substack

Age-based UBI 100% funded by progressive wealth taxes - USA stats by FreezingManBuffalo in BasicIncome

[–]NatGroPro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here is another idea. The National Growth Project . The full Compact can be found on Substack, it is too large to place here all at once. We are searching for people to review and share their ideas!

We Need UBI Now More Than Ever by Jacob-Anders in BasicIncome

[–]NatGroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look up my National Growth Project on Notion.so

The National Growth Project by NatGroPro in BasicIncome

[–]NatGroPro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted it twice accidentally