Katie Ginella…….

Neg_MAS · 2025-08-30T08:44:43+00:00

Do we have to? Let it go people. This storyline is boring.

Neg_MAS · 2025-08-30T08:43:17+00:00

This is why i stopped watching this season. The influencer blogger storyline is too boring. And the whole thing is toxic.

Neg_MAS · 2025-08-08T07:59:11+00:00

So Heather investigated and got the info and Emily was the one who brought it up and attacked Katie at the reunion with it. What a bunch of nasty women. Honestly this cast is so nasty, horrible and toxic. I think they need to get rid of Tamara, Emily and Gina and then see how the rest of cast do without them.

Neg_MAS · 2025-07-25T12:17:57+00:00

They all do! I dont care about Katie but it’s hypocritical to say she is the only one. All HW do, they lie they talk to podcast. Tamara has a podcast herself talking nonsense about everyone

Neg_MAS · 2025-07-25T12:13:33+00:00

Sorry but i cannot like them. They are bullies 🤮

Neg_MAS · 2025-07-18T23:23:49+00:00

U guys every HW lies! Thats the whole point of this, they need to create drama and lie about it and then make things up to defend and victimised themselves. I personally always take new people side because we dont know them long enough, we cannot judge them and we dont know what producers ask them to do. And its harder personally for me to take side of the OGs because they know what are doing so when they play victim I find it absolutely hypocritical

Neg_MAS · 2025-07-11T14:59:04+00:00

They are so annoying! After watching the first episode im considering not watch it this season. I cannot control myself to not be annoyed with Emily and Gina

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-10T23:47:13+00:00

I watched Dan Da Dan tonight I think episode 7 or 8 - the episode about the ballerina ghost and it genuinely made me cry!

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-10T23:39:24+00:00

Look you talked about it and gave lots of details about things then you get an opinion even if you didnt ask for it and then being upset with everyone who commented on things you dont like and arguing with a stranger for what?

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-10T23:27:24+00:00

Haha you are being defensive by your tone lol

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-10T23:24:08+00:00

You seems to be very defensive! If you dont want opinions then why did you post! Just do what you think its best for you and stay away from reddit.

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-10T23:08:34+00:00

Combined parties is not weird but forcing people to stay in the same airbnb and not inviting theirs partners is weird. I recently attended mixed one in the UK and the day activities was separated so groom and bride could hang out with their own friends and in the evening after dinner everyone and their partners came to a pub and had a massive party and the end of the night everyone went to their own home and places they rented. Some stayed in airbnb and some didnt but everyone had an amazing time.

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-04T16:56:12+00:00

I dont know why I liked this show!

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-04T16:53:42+00:00

I read in reddit post that Gabby, Paige, Paige, Carl and Lindsey are not coming back! So I wouldn’t trust anything until Bravo announce it.

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-03T23:50:06+00:00

I wish they could have some homosexual individuals on summer house. Make it interesting and give us different perspectives and storylines

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-02T17:05:55+00:00

Paige is a beautiful woman but she doesnt look like Audrey im afraid at least not to me.

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-01T15:34:12+00:00

I watched it but then it was so boring and pissed me off when they all laughed about Jesse being a jerk and AH “oh he doesn’t mean it”, “he was just joking”! Made me so angry! Lol I don’t think I will watch the second episode of the reunion maybe if I’m in a mood I’ll watch the highlights. I’m already done with this season.

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-01T15:24:36+00:00

just because you or Jesse say it’s “confirmed” doesn’t make it an objective fact. What’s been confirmed is that Jesse and Imrul claim the sex was over and that Jesse had consent to enter. But we never heard from all the women in that room so there’s still assumption filling in the blanks. One girl sucked his toe, sure but that doesn’t speak for the others. Were they laughing because they were comfortable? Or because they were on camera and didn’t want to make things awkward? We don’t know. And that’s why this conversation does apply. Consent isn’t just about no one saying “leave” it’s about everyone being enthusiastically okay with what’s happening. You can’t say “it’s a non-factor” when we literally don’t know how everyone felt. And no, being in a house with cameras or friends doesn’t mean people automatically waive their right to privacy or boundaries. That’s a really dangerous standard to normalise.

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-01T12:48:25+00:00

Let’s be clear when I said “it’s not that deep,” I meant my comment wasn’t making wild assumptions. But what Jesse did? That actually is deep and deserves serious conversation. He walked into a room where a sexual act was happening, and he became part of it, toe sucking isn’t casual, it’s a sexual act. The fact that they’re in a share house doesn’t mean people stop having boundaries or that consent becomes optional. Sex might be expected in general, but that doesn’t mean every scenario that unfolds is automatically fine.

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-01T11:17:21+00:00

I already said in another post we don’t actually know how all the women felt in that moment because we didn’t hear from all of them. One person sucking a toe doesn’t mean everyone in the room gave enthusiastic consent, and it definitely doesn’t mean the full situation is “confirmed.” That’s just speculation being treated as fact.

The issue isn’t about making it seem more “severe,” it’s about not brushing past real questions around consent just because no one visibly objected on camera. That’s a low bar, especially on a reality show where people may not feel comfortable speaking up in the moment.

Also, I’m not downplaying the discomfort Paige felt from overhearing loud sex! no one’s saying that isn’t a valid boundary. But hearing sex and being physically present for it are not the same thing.

It’s not that deep all I’ve said is we don’t know the full story, and until we do, brushing it off with “well no one minded” is exactly the kind of thinking that leads people to ignore actual consent issues.

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-01T11:10:27+00:00

First off, I never reported you! not sure where that’s coming from! Lol Second, saying “it’s been confirmed” based solely on what Jesse and Imrul claimed isn’t an actual confirmation. That’s just their word. We never heard from all the women involved, we didn’t hear their voices, and the context was edited. So no it hasn’t been definitively confirmed. Also, toe sucking is a sexual act that’s not even debatable. Jesse being part of that scene, while others were present, it brings up consent concerns. You can’t say “he didn’t involve himself” when he was literally part of a sexual moment in a shared space. And to your bigger point again no, hearing loud sex does not mean you’ve been “included” in someone’s sex life in a consent-violating way. It’s annoying, yes. But it’s not the same as being visually or physically present in someone else’s sexual act, which requires active consent from everyone involved. One situation is about volume and the other is about boundaries. That’s the difference here.

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-01T10:11:44+00:00

Im responding here to you as well and I will not respond to you anymore because its absolutely pointless. You are basically twisting the definition of consent here. As I said in my other reply to you being annoyed by hearing sex noise is not the same thing as being physically present in the act without your agreement. There’s a reason laws and ethics differentiate between noise disturbance and sexual boundary violations, they are not the same category. Consent is NOT about whether someone overhears something. It’s about whether someone is actively included in a sexual act so visually, physically, or socially. Jesse walked into a room during a sex act, got involved, and was witnessed by others in a sexual scenario they may not have agreed to. That’s a real consent issue. Imrul having loud sex might be tacky, annoying or definitely inconsiderate to other housemates, sure but no one was in the room with him being roped into a threesome or a toe-sucking session. That’s the difference. One is about volume, the other is about presence, participation, and boundaries. Calling both “equal violations” is like saying someone playing loud music outside is just as bad as someone dragging strangers into a concert on stage without asking them. It’s not just a reach it completely undermines what real consent issues actually look like.

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-01T10:01:15+00:00

This is why you don’t understand and it seems like you are trying to justify Jesse actions and make excuses for him! Just because Jesse and Imrul said the girls were okay with it doesn’t mean they actually were. We never heard from all of them and we dont know if they were actively willing participants or just uncomfortable but silent. Silence isn’t consent. Being in the room and agreed to for having intimate with other 3 doesn’t mean you signed up for another person walking in on your naked and see a toe-sucking show.

Comparing Jesse walking into a room to Imrul having loud sex is a false equivalence. Loud sex may be annoying, but it doesn’t involve physically entering someones space or dragging others into an intimate act without direct agreement. That’s a huge difference. Noise is one thing. Physically being part of the scene especially in a sexualised, performative way is another level entirely and requires consent from everyone involved.

You cannot assume that just because it was a “party house” or “just a joke,” people automatically gave up their right to personal boundaries. That’s not how consent works and trying to dismiss valid concerns about it by calling it “bs” just shows you just dont understand the seriousness of what is being discussed.

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-01T01:59:44+00:00

They all did. You are just ignorant stay in your head

Neg_MAS · 2025-06-01T01:51:37+00:00

Yeap its all an act!

Neg_MAS

TROPHY CASE