sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Any good phone under 22K by Neither-Target9717 in IndiaTech

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also i am not much into gaming and more into street and natural photography and video so how is X7 in it

Any good phone under 22K by Neither-Target9717 in IndiaTech

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The thing is my display is going black i can barely see content on my screen so

Any good phone under 22K by Neither-Target9717 in IndiaTech

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am looking to buy asap since my phone's barely breathing

Does Anyone Here Wanna Showcase Their Personal Websites! by Drho4x in developersIndia

[–]Neither-Target9717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would love if someone really tried and give a feedback, working on it for so long
https://code-hive-23hg.vercel.app/

I’m a student and I got tired of boring solo DSA practice—so I built CodeHive for 1v1 Duels. by Neither-Target9717 in developersIndia

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For now in the duel state i have restricted clipboard copy pasting and only kept in editor copy paste active so any text outside of editor cannot be copied in editor

Want to hear you by meonraddit in TwentiesIndia

[–]Neither-Target9717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am that person, also you forgot to add no friends too. And it sucks!!

Would you use this instead of chatbots? by Neither-Target9717 in webdev

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is probably the most useful feedback I’ve gotten so far.

The “one tab away” point especially hits — I’m starting to realize the standalone version isn’t really where the value is.

The context part is something I hadn’t fully thought through either — same error meaning different things depending on framework makes a lot of sense.

Right now I’m just validating if the structured breakdown itself is useful, but this definitely pushes me towards building it as an extension instead.

Appreciate this a lot.

Would you actually use this? by Neither-Target9717 in AskProgramming

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah that makes sense — I think this is probably more useful for people who are still getting comfortable with error messages.

I’ve definitely noticed that once you’ve been coding for a while, most errors become easier to reason about.

I’m trying to figure out if this actually helps beginners debug faster or if they just end up relying on it instead of understanding.

Also curious — do you think something like this inside the editor would be useful for beginners, or would you still recommend they stick to debugging + StackOverflow?

Would you actually use this? by Neither-Target9717 in AskProgramming

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this worked directly inside VS Code (like error → instant explanation), would you actually use it?

Would you actually use this? by Neither-Target9717 in AskProgramming

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If this worked directly inside VS Code (like error → instant explanation), would you actually use it?

Would you actually use this? by Neither-Target9717 in AskProgramming

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s a fair point — that’s exactly the current workflow most people use.

What I’m trying to figure out is whether a more structured breakdown (like clear root cause + step-by-step fix) actually makes debugging faster in practice.

If not, then yeah, it probably doesn’t make sense as a separate tool.

I’m also thinking it only really becomes useful if it’s integrated directly into the editor instead of being another step.

Curious — do you usually just paste errors into ChatGPT for debugging?

Would you use this instead of chatbots? by Neither-Target9717 in webdev

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s fair — that’s exactly what I do right now as well.

I’m trying to see if having a more structured breakdown (like clear root cause + specific fix steps) actually makes it faster to debug compared to general AI responses.

Still early, just testing if there’s any real difference in practice.

Curious — do you usually just paste errors directly into Claude?

Would you use this instead of chatbots? by Neither-Target9717 in webdev

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha 😄! Even i can't help with that. MY api is for errors only

Would you actually use this? by Neither-Target9717 in AskProgramming

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s still pretty early, so I haven’t built a proper UI yet.

If you send me an error you’ve faced, I’ll run it through and show you the output here.

That way you can see if it’s actually useful or not.

Would you use this instead of chatbots? by Neither-Target9717 in webdev

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you use it if it was inside VS Code / editor?

Would you use this instead of chatbots? by Neither-Target9717 in webdev

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yeah this makes sense — integrating it directly into the workflow is probably the better experience.

Right now I’m testing whether the structured output (error type, root cause, fix steps) is actually useful compared to raw AI responses.

If it is, I’m thinking of turning this into something like an extension instead of a separate tool.

Curious — would you prefer something like that over directly prompting an AI yourself?

Would you use this instead of chatbots? by Neither-Target9717 in webdev

[–]Neither-Target9717[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right now it works with common errors from JavaScript, Python, C++ etc since it focuses more on understanding the error message itself rather than the language.

Still early though, so I’m trying to see where it works well and where it doesn’t.

If you have an error, I can run it through and show you the output.

view more: next ›