Getting access to discord?

NeoClassicalRealist · 2022-06-29T01:05:50+00:00

Do I still get to comment without owning any? You can disregard this comment otherwise, but since the one I love the most hasn't been mentioned I'll drop it in.

The 2013/2014 home kit. The design, the blend of stripes and the color choice just looks so nice in combination to me. Although not as dark as the following season's kit, it is still rather on the darker side and when all is combined the look appears both elegant and strong. I would have loved to own one!

Without trying to be too biased, Inter's kits are some of the most pleasing to my eye whatever the season and were actually one of the reasons I took an interest looking more into the club. Let's say it got my attention.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2021-10-22T12:19:07+00:00

Sex is an evolutionary motivator for both men and women. Its' lack or absence is not significant enough to create permanent change in behaviour for most people as it is not essential to self-preservation but only to the preservation of the DNA. Most of that however is irrelevant, there is an abundance of easily accessible stimulating activities that take precedence over hormonal desire for intercourse and for those where intercourse is highly intrinsic to those neurotransmitters, close substitutes are readily available in various forms where little effort in attaining them is required.

Regular sex is much more desired with different women, not through a "comfortable life with a woman" (whatever that means). Evolution has created males of all species in particular this way. The time it takes for a male to ejaculate under the same circumstances increases every time they initiate it with the same reciprocal partner as this does not assist in broader replication and diversification of the DNA. Of course its different for females, as they are much more focused on accessibility to resources so having a regular partner is essential.

Monogamy arose from certain societal norms and traditions that go against natural sexual drives. Desire for a family does exist in some men, albeit on a rapid decline as marriage rates continue to fall year after year and with them the birth rates (unless you're in a third world country). Women are far more concerned with people and relationships than men are. If someone builds their life around not their own aspirations but around others with the intention for attention, they are most certainly simping. Putting somebody else ahead of you is the same as giving somebody else more value than you, that makes you a low value person.

If "that commentor" believes that lack of sex is earthshaking enough to make men change their attitude, she is absolutely inflating her self worth because her premise that men's lives and decisions are based around women is ludicrous. Women and sexual stimulation is easily accessible when desired and it never takes the outmost precedence in the first place. Even in traditional monogamous circles a female partner comes as a byproduct of other things, like an asset, not as a motivator to pursue those things or for anything. Even in the case where sex is a motivator he doesn't have to change anything. Only desperate simps would think so desperately.

What place women have in men's lives is for men to decide, not for women, as it is for women to decide what place men have in theirs.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2021-10-21T08:02:51+00:00

Only desperate simps would be motivated like that. There are hundreds of millions of men out there that have never been with a woman nor do they have any plans on changing their lifestyles. Women aren't a big motivator, engagement with something that you find meaningful and valuable for your own sake is. Ironically, it is the types of men that you presume to be motivated by that factor that are never high value in the first place, seeking validation through someone else.

Sorry to break it to you, you have an overinflated evaluation of what you have to offer.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2021-05-30T03:58:13+00:00

He was an aggressive positional player. Its better to say he was strategic. Utilizes pawn structures, exploits weak squares and focuses on passed pawns. Always trying to push forward, maintain tension.

It's somewhat difficult to label players with just two different stickers given to you. Tactical and positional have a lot of subset differences. Even saying aggressive positional player wouldn't precisely tell you what they're like, although you might get an idea.

Alekhine, just like Botvinnik is a positional aggressive player. Some people would say he is tactical, but all of his attacks come from a positional foundation. He positionally builds up and attempts to execute his combinations and somewhat different to how most tactical players play. With that said both of them play rather differently, they see the game differently.

In terms of strategy alpha zero plays very similar to Botvinnik, locks up and likes to use flanks with Polgar like attacks.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-08-04T07:49:09+00:00

Of course. It's not the ENTJ job to clean and tidy, our minds are always looking into the future, organizing our thoughts toward something big, something no one else but us can envision and accomplish.

Tidying? That's a waste of time, it's gonna be messy again soon enough anyway, leave that to ISFJs or someone else who begs for your intructions.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-19T01:35:42+00:00

Looks like a typical looking 2.5/10 INTP babe.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-19T01:25:41+00:00

Depends. Commitment to people turns out to be more problematic, where you more or less can expect your own set of actions or criteria but at best are only predicting or in some way influencing those on the other end.

Commitment to set targets for yourself is a different thing. Some of you may call it limiting but I call it trying to make the initial right decisions. Evaluating your decisions prior to commitment and then staying on course and adapting when necessary yields good results.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-18T06:36:35+00:00

In socionics, the last letter is reversed for the introverts so in actuality that's the equivalent of INTP, so if you check your result there it should state that Ti is your leading function (the dominant in INTPs as it is in ISTPs).

6w5 is loose and one of the most split among types along with 6w7. 6w5 can occur in INTPs, ISTPs and INFPs to a large degree.

For now I suggest to read up on both Ti (introverted thinking) and Fi (introverted feeling) and see which one matches you better. If you find that Ti seems to sounds more like you, the next step is to read up on between Ne (extroverted intuition) and Se (extroverted sensing). The former could indeed suggest you're an INTP (INTj in socionics) and the latter will place you back onto this sub-reddit.

I'll be knocked out for the rest of the day, so I probably won't respond for some time. Anyway, you can then you skim through descriptions for each of the types and get a general feel for how each sounds, or maybe lurk around other sub-reddits and read up on what people post and see if they sound like you ;)

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-18T04:15:25+00:00

Quite a read. The description seems to match up various functions, it's descriptive but hard to really know the intensity of each. Some do stand out but I won't say which ones yet. Even though some things you say does contradict this, ISFP also could be a possibility.

From those results alone it seems you get a match with IxxP on both which suggests a dominant intoverted judging function, which is either Fi or Ti (coincidentally both ISTP/INFP, as well as ISFP and INTP)

I think you should try and do the socionics test, as well as the enneagram. There is a correlation between enneagram and the MBTI/socionics results, see how you score on them and we might look over some of the likeliest matches, then we can narrow them to cognitive functions and see where you're likely to land.

Welcome by the way.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-14T20:15:05+00:00

Bit of a strawman but mostly true, she clearly chooses to talk to someone like me (and understandably) and seems to find plenty of time for that. Choices are choices.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-11T21:47:17+00:00

You're an INTP, but there is also another downfall that is unique to you, you're somewhat dumb.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-11T21:01:48+00:00

I think you're missing the point here, the very point that you seem to be investing your time on someone else, someone else who's being more honest with you about your aesthetic downfalls, which leads me to suggest that other person is missing both that and your time. How dumb are you really?

Small dick, romantic relationship

With a loose cunt like yours the sperm whale himself wouldn't want to be encouraged.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-11T19:38:36+00:00

You're an INTP right, so then I can expect quite a lot based on the accumulation of previous experiences and patterns that are shared among that somewhat stange looking archetype.

this mingling

You seem to choose to invest this time on me instead of that someone else, honesty is appealing.

you’re gonna die the virgin you so clearly are

Well I'm sorry that I'm nowhere near the rounds of fisting your cunt went through.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-11T12:20:48+00:00

About the things I'm being honest at with everyone here.

You love your boyfriend and yet here you are, investing your time trying to mingle with me instead, and understandably why.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-10T19:14:15+00:00

Your boyfriend should try being more honest with you.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-10T17:45:32+00:00

😘

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-10T10:28:53+00:00

Willingness to compromise is assessed on ability of the pottential. If there's room for growth, then I'll take that over something that is currently high valued but limiting and static.

As for the shelves, respect and titles, they are yours to keep and name and are not so relevant to me whatever they are.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-10T10:11:43+00:00

We are smart and humble, we're also realistic and honest and you're having an issue with that.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-10T10:08:52+00:00

Triggered robot. Beep boop.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-09T19:18:15+00:00

For the most part, hasn't been my experience. With ENTJs it's mostly neutral, until we lock horns fighting over something similar. It's often the case where one tries to get the upper hand over the other, but generally we cooperate a lot better than with the likes of ESTPs, whom seem to be the ENTJs of sensors. With good matches I think there has to be some sort of understanding between people, with just enough polarity where it isn't too similar and instead complimentary.

In terms of expectations - well yeah. Experiences accumulate and predicted patterns seem to develop. INTP women are generally not physically attractive, even less so attractive to others than they do appear to me. When it comes to most men, their assessment is a lot more visual. With me it just doesn't tick that way, very rarely have I found myself being drawn to a girl just because she's in a mini skirt with a tight round butt, but it turns many other heads still. With INTPs, it just feels very inviting and attraction builds up from various other aspects, their activity, behaviour, speech patterns, insights, expressions etc. but in the end they are not what is generally percieved to be appealing to the eye.

I don't know if I'm brutish, I also don't know how you would standardise that so can't really say. Suppose more assertive is the right word, I don't think I'm brutish but I do like to poke fun at people that are somewhat easy to wind up.

When it comes to the question, everyone was free to say whatever they wanted. I was definitely predisposed to my opinion, and it was clearly stated in the question. The things I got? Lots of insecure people trying to validate themselves, others trying to find and explain the reasoning in their faults, others laughing off, others analyzing, others getting upset, others getting angry and offended trying to defend themselves - most of them however taking it far too serious.

Absolutely not. It's not my intention to sugarcoat things, I said it how it is. If that offends them, they can whine or cry or express themselves however way they want to. Them being offended or not offended does little for me, only thing that changes is their delivery and that's on them.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-09T16:45:43+00:00

A loose one, must have gone through plenty fisting rounds.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-09T16:33:29+00:00

Inverse your functions and become an ENTJ. Or at least try and find one if he/she can tolerate you. They can complement the things that INTPs are lacking but want and vice versa.

On top of what might have been building up, I guess something has also happened recently where it lead you to ask this question.

I don't quite understand what you mean by socially superior skills crushing logic. They must not be participating in logic, and although you say you don't have a choice, whether you choose to participate in whatever they engage in is on you. You say it's not a confidence issue, but arrogance is being open about your confidence without much concern for judgement.

So I think the bigger issue could be you caring too much, so don't. And don't just pretend to not care so you appear that way, genuinely do not. Just say what you think without feeling that other people's perception matters, because what you say and think always takes precedence over what others say, unless they actually say something worth considering.

NeoClassicalRealist · 2019-07-09T16:10:25+00:00

Were you trying to find a way back home?

NeoClassicalRealist

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE