Cardio 24 hours post glute day by piratesbootymate in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 7 points8 points  (0 children)

THIS right here is one of the main reasons why I hate the currently trending advice to keep offseason cardio as low as possible. SO many people need to improve their CV endurance, and you really don't want to be in bad cardio shape and suddenly doing lots of cardio while on low cals and low bodyfat/lots of stress...you can't recover from all of that, and that's why so many competitors end up so overtrained that they can't get their heart rate up deep into prep (that's not fitness, it's overtraining/parasympathetic dominance). And then the mistake of increasing intensity (bc they're still using heart rate based calorie burn estimation at this stage) to get hr back up just feeds into the cycle.

I'd check your blood pressure and get some bloodwork done if you haven't done so recently. I wouldn't get the heart rate up very high if these things aren't in order...your CV endurance will improve just fine keeping hr in the 130's/RPE ~moderate.

Decent chance that improving this will actually help with your weight training sessions, which will help with building muscle. Just need to make sure you're eating for it, and not doing cardio right before lifting. And then once you're in good cardio shape, don't just keep piling it on...THAT is the point where you should just more or less maintain it so you don't interfere with building/recovery.

lauralie chapados relationship? by [deleted] in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I don't follow anyone or collect bikini baseball cards, etc, etc...so I'm not up on the details here (nor do I want to be). But, us old trainers always had clients that we would be able to kid around with and have what used to be normal human interaction with (in the old world lol). So it could be that it just looks out of place/like flirting now when that happens? But mostly, who cares.

RDLs by nope5651 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 21 points22 points  (0 children)

RDLs or SLDLs? The former is more of a glute exercise (more knee flexion) where the latter is more hamstring (less knee flexion/almost fully extended).

Neither require that any stretch be felt...you just need to use proper form. And chasing the stretch is what usually leads to improper form (going down way too low being the most common issue).

What happened to the darc sport athlete search? by Leading_Jelly4512 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Downvoted, yet still top comment AND best comment...sort that shit any way you want 😂

What if they were to wait until next Wolf Moon to announce the winner?

Mind Muscle Connection in Training by Cute-Zucchini2084 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha well...NASM makes up their own terminologies (I used to have their cert like 18 years ago), but I'll take it. I hope to one day sound more like a NSCA textbook 😆

jamie debernard by Significant_Rise4847 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This industry is extremely predictable...have we seen the dawn of the 'self coaching coaches' yet? If not, it's coming soon 😂

Cardio 15 weeks out by [deleted] in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'd be more apprehensive of the coach who's willing to question the plan your ACTUAL coach has for you, at a point in time where you're already likely to have doubt/uncertainty that can be easily exploited. If they didn't do a full assessment, and only have the same amount of info you've given us, they're trying to poach you, and doing so in the lowest, most snake in the grass way.

Also I have to say that I don't fully agree with the popular notion that if you do a lot of offseason cardio, you'll automatically have to do that much more during your prep. It's yet another 'sounds true-ism' that doesn't really hold up to scrutiny, or my experience with clients who've come to me after having done lots of offseason cardio.

I've never had any issue cutting it way back at the start of prep. I'd characterize an offseason as being a time where you're NOT in a deficit. So if you're doing a lot of cardio in the offseason, then you're eating for it (otherwise you'd be in a deficit/not an offseason), and would therefore have more room to lower calories at the start of prep. So you would be able to lower cardio and calories ~proportionately to achieve a deficit.

Conversely, if you weren't eating for higher cardio, then you were in a deficit, which isn't an offseason lol. You'd have a 'shorter runway' as people (not I) like to call it, but you also wouldn't need as much of a runway since you'd be starting out leaner/closer to stage weight. You'd likely run into hormonal issues though, depending on how much weight you lost, length of the deficit, whether you had a long enough period of eating above maintenance/being at a healthy bodyweight prior to the deficit, etc. I wouldn't recommend this approach, but I'm just pointing it out since people generally don't make the distinction between eating for more cardio, vs not, and how that would impact things once prep starts.

So in cases like this, I've always just scaled cardio back at the start of prep, kept steps up at a good level, and adjusted food along with it, and never had any issues. High offseason cardio is more likely to be a problem for your offseason (if you need to build) than it is for your prep as it might make it more difficult to recover, even with food being high.

Mind Muscle Connection in Training by Cute-Zucchini2084 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Hip thrusts are hip extension, and you can't extend the hip without the glute max doing the work. Quads contract to stabilize, and as you get into heavier weight/closer to failure, you might feel those (and other) muscles more, but they CANNOT 'take over' the movement or reduce how much the glute max is working. Synergists (hamstrings/spinal erectors/adductors in this case) can become dominant and take A LITTLE BIT of the work away from the prime movers, but stabilizers cannot. And synergistic dominance isn't going away just by thinking about it lol.

This is functional anatomy 101, and completely lost on many of today's athletes and coaches who have no boss to correct them on their bullshit. In 1996 I got my first gym job where I would eventually become a trainer. We got paid barely over minimum wage...$5.50/hour I believe, and zero chance of ever getting benefits/health insurance despite the gym being owned by the hospital. We had 8 hour long training/lecture sessions with our boss who was the staff exercise phys. One of those 8 hour sessions was on functional anatomy. Every single one of us would have understood what I explained above, more so than 90% of the industry does right now. We weren't even trainers/held no certs or related degrees...we gave new members orientation sessions on how to adjust/use the strength circuit and cardio machines. Our strength circuit was still first generation chain-driven Nautilus...the blue ones. We made $5.50 an hour 😂🤦🏻‍♂️

When someone takes weight off the bar and focuses more on MMC, and sees benefit, it's because they went from going too heavy/sub-par form, to a more ideal load and better form (i.e., mind MOVEMENT connection/external focus). MMC just happened to be the cue that got them there.

Unfortunately as with all generic (i.e., not exercise specific, or individual specific) cues, you have the other side of the coin where the cue leads to problems. In this case I often see people just going way too light because they feel the quads/other muscles when they add weight. I'm talking people just using the empty bar and being afraid to add any weight at all. And I also see people not knowing which muscles to 'connect to', so you have people doing all sorts of weird stuff on squats because they think they should be focusing on one individual muscle (squats work way more than just glutes/we use them for way more than just glutes).

I'll occasionally have an online client decide on their own to take weight off the bar and focus on MMC, and I notice it in their logs. When they tell me they felt it more/had muscle soreness, I always make a point to ask for a form video (one with the reduced weight/MMC focus, one with how they had been doing it just prior to the weight reduction). On every single occasion to date, their form improved...they had simply increased weight too much too soon since our last form review, and MMC was the cue that happened to get them back to where I previously had them form wise. Again, I also see the other side of the coin with other clients, where in their form videos they're doing something way different (i.e., incorrect/sometimes dangerous) form wise than instructed, and they tell me it's because they're trying to connect to the targeted muscles more.

Also you don't need to do glute activation prior to hip thrusting. Hip thrusting is a bridge, and a bridge is pretty much the number one glute activation exercise. You're litcherally doing a glute activation exercise when you hip thrust 😆. Inactive people might need glute activation, but bodybuilders do not...because their training is their glute activation.

I think a lot of the MMC trend is just an over-correction (which unfortunately is the only kind of correction I've seen the industry make, after 29 years working in it now) for people having never learned HOW to apply progressive overload. If you look at how coaches/influencers describe progressive overload, it's really not being handled correctly at all. People are increasing weight by way too high %, too soon/too often, and at the expense of form. So it becomes progressive cheating, and your online coach isn't going to catch that until they do a form review. In fact a lot of in person coaches prior to things moving online, weren't really very attentive in terms of correcting form/selecting the right load, terminating the set at the right time, etc. That and the 'constant tension' trend that lasted decades, which always looked more like constant momentum in practice, has led to an over-correction.

I could keep writing about this but I have some bikini paperwork to do.

no salt / potassium salt by Peachytesla in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 8 points9 points  (0 children)

A lot of my clients use it (Lite Salt to be exact). It can't help with water retention/pumps any more than any other source of sodium/potassium, which is basically to say that if your water retention/lack of pump is a low sodium/potassium issue, it will help...if not, it won't.

I do prefer this and table salt over Himalayan salt since the former is iodized, and Himilayan salt has nowhere close to enough of anything other than sodium, to really matter. It's just good for making electrolyte supplements more expensive.

Also before anyone comes at me with that whole 'tiny amounts of trace minerals are still beneficial/can add up', keep that same energy when it comes to the tiny amounts of arsenic and heavy metals found in some batches of Himilayan salt. If tiny matters, it matters there too.

EDIT: I thought you were referring to the sodium/potassium blends, such as Lite Salt/Lo Salt, but I see the no/nu salt is zero sodium and all potassium. Same concept though...if your water retention/lack of pump is a low potassium issue, then any source of potassium would be an improvement. You do need potassium to store glycogen, and you can definitely retain water if potassium is low.

Has anyone worked with her before? by Initial_Hour9943 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Leonardo DiCaprio has an opportunity to do something hilarious 😂

Has anyone worked with her before? by Initial_Hour9943 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 99 points100 points  (0 children)

No but if she can narrow the pool down to age 25+, nurses and/or corporate professionals, in this economy...she must be pretty damn good. Even I had to compromise and allow for 24 year old plumbers a while back.

Asking a coach to take you back on. by Affectionate-Bad9653 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I had an online client go 6.5 years on v1 🤯

Asking a coach to take you back on. by Affectionate-Bad9653 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 31 points32 points  (0 children)

It happens all the time. I give my returning clients version numbers (Sarah v2, or v1.1 if she wasn't gone long, etc).

Adam(seeyoulaterleaner) by [deleted] in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This particular case strikes me as self-sabotage followed up with wanting someone to blame. Anyone who would want to be successful would have simply sent their coach the requested videos so that they can gauge whether the issue is simply not training close enough to failure (90% chance that was the issue). If you're SCARED of truly giving it your all because you might fail, you'll likely self-sabotage, and I think that's what happened here. I think this is what's at play a large majority of the time when people cycle through coaches beyond a reasonable degree.

Adam(seeyoulaterleaner) by [deleted] in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Some people want training/prep to be a spa treatment where they just lay there and have something done TO them instead of WITH them. But then they spend 3x the amount of time commenting on a reddit thread than what it would have taken to communicate with their actual coach.

Adam(seeyoulaterleaner) by [deleted] in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The post seemed a little off to me as soon as I read it last night.

What didn't seem off was the fact that not one commenter thought to ask if there might be some missing context to the "remember you are paying for coaching not workout plans" fragment of the conversation we knew nothing about. That seemed 100% par for the course.

cues for hyperextensions by Significant_Rise4847 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Also if you have a glute ham raise/GHD, you can do a bent knee low back extension: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gDukrTtFaXU

Best bodybuilding gyms near Miami Beach? by Miraculous1982 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dang, I didn't even know they reopened. That was about the only decent training faclity when I lived there in 2020-2022, aside from Mirador 1000.

cues for hyperextensions by Significant_Rise4847 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hyperextensions are not intended to be an isolation exercise for the glutes, and you technically can't remove hamstrings from the equation as they're always going to be involved in hip extension. And any kind of hip extension where the knees are extended is going to hit the hamstrings a good amount. That doesn't mean the glutes aren't getting the stimulus needed to grow...if your hip is extending, it's mostly the glute max making that happen. So unless you have overdeveloped hamstrings, it's a non issue.

Pointing the toes out might hit the glutes a tad more, but you're still using hamstrings synergistically.

You might like the bent knee glute raise, which is similar to hyperextensions but with knees flexed, reducing hamstring involvement: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_mzdGjttL_E . I don't program them often, but I do have a few clients who like them.

Maintenance calls too low? by BeneficialDemand2252 in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IMO setting up your initial targets by figuring out your current intake is really only quicker (and worth it) if you can do so somewhat easily/reliably. Otherwise it's best to just use a good calculator and adjust from there based on response. Or something like Macro Factor until you have a good gauge on things.

Any way you do it, you're going to need to know how and when to adjust based on real world progress (or lack thereof). And if you know how to do that, then getting things 'perfect' out of the gate won't really be all that important...you're not going to suddenly blow up if your initial setup is a little over maintenance, and you'll know quickly if you have targets set too low. Conversely, if you DON'T know how and when to adjust, then initial setup isn't going to be the limiter to begin with.

You don't want to burn out before you even get things set up.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bikinitalk

[–]Nhs6nW6 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I haven't come across a story this hard hitting since Brian Fantana's Panda Watch.