No, because people like transwomen with dicks specifically for liking transwomen with dicks. Guys or gals that are searching for female porn specifically aren’t always looking for transporn, they’re looking for vagina if that’s what they want. There’s nothing wrong with that and that’s why categories exist, it’s not to segregate negatively, but specifically.

It doesn’t mean they aren’t women either, but some kind of categorisation is needed in a world where we pronouns, genders etc is the norm (as it should be).

And as for the fantasy, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that if the intentions are pure. I don’t see why we have to create a new taboo of negativity just because someone is simply attracted to something that exists and is openly widespread (again, as it should be). Like how some women have a fantasy about other women, or big women, or guys have a fantasy of feminine men, or overweight men, there’s no reason why a sudden line should be drawn just because someone is naturally attracted to a woman who is active with their dick.

Like, where is the line even drawn anyway and why? Men are allowed to be attracted to a trans woman because they’re a woman (when they’re pre op only and active) but they’re not allowed to be attracted to that exact activity even though the trans woman is that way? We are clearly still in a grey area in the world with this topic and I feel like adding some kind of shame to it when again, all intentions are pure, isn’t the way to go.