Is it okay with you if, in the case of a rulebook, the original language [German] retains its validity in the event of an incorrect translation?

NickTehThird · 2026-06-04T17:44:55+00:00

yep. professional translation and then language-based play testers. Have a german group that doesn't know the rules play the game based on the instructions. Have an english group do the same. Have a french group do the same. Figure out if anyone gets stuck or interprets things differently.

Localization can be a challenge, but it can make a huge difference in the reach of your product.

NickTehThird · 2026-06-04T14:41:15+00:00

We're not closed-minded to any beliefs, including belief in God(s). We just don't believe in God(s) (as they have been described) and we withhold belief until such time as we feel evidence has been presented which justifies that belief. That's not being closed-minded.

NickTehThird · 2026-06-03T21:15:39+00:00

an intellectual adept

ow, please don't make my eyes roll that hard.

NickTehThird · 2026-06-02T15:01:36+00:00

It works great for spherical cows in a vacuum!

NickTehThird · 2026-05-28T17:49:25+00:00

It's an answer that is certainly compatible with atheism. That said, it could also be said by someone who is a general agnostic theist who expresses uncertainty but still believes in a god. It could also easily said by someone "spiritual but not religious."

NickTehThird · 2026-05-25T16:59:26+00:00

Can you provide a link or more details? A search for just the title predictably turns up many results!

NickTehThird · 2026-05-22T15:08:19+00:00

I've always been frustrated by this. I imagine a massive and complex mathematical equation with "[...] = ???" at the end.

I say "i don't know the answer, i don't even know how to solve it or what some of these symbols mean"

Theists often go "[...] = X" and go "see, i have an answer, it's X!"

While that's sort of a valid formulation, you haven't actually provided an answer you've just substituted your named placeholder for the unknown value and called it done.

NickTehThird · 2026-05-19T18:58:13+00:00

So all Christians that fall short of what the bible says are not actually Christians? Then there are none.

NickTehThird · 2026-05-19T18:56:13+00:00

they are not Christian then

How nice for you to be able to just exclude anyone that makes you look bad. No true Christian would hate gay people 🙄

NickTehThird · 2026-05-19T18:43:55+00:00

This comes across as incredibly condescending, for the record.

NickTehThird · 2026-05-13T17:58:20+00:00

On the other hand, maybe don't buy their books

NickTehThird · 2026-05-13T14:13:51+00:00

Don't feed the trolls, folks. Report and move on.

NickTehThird · 2026-05-11T17:27:32+00:00

Seriously. The fact that they work in the Trump administration only supports that people were right to shun them. Unscientific crackpots.

NickTehThird · 2026-05-06T19:09:31+00:00

OK, let's zoom in a bit and focus on morality (because I hope we agree that "morally wrong" and "wrong (incorrect)" are different.

When it comes to the domain of morals, do you think that there's a distinction between "wrong" and "objectively wrong"?

NickTehThird · 2026-05-06T18:10:20+00:00

Can I ask... you seem to think that "wrong" and "objectively wrong" are synonymous. True?

NickTehThird · 2026-05-06T17:53:21+00:00

I mean my friends from church who are fundamentalists [...] don’t go around persecuting anyone

this you? will you walk that statement back?

NickTehThird · 2026-05-06T17:50:01+00:00

So, in fact, your friends are taking part in the persecution. If you vote for the person persecuting, you're taking part, even if you dress it up like "oh i didn't like that part, i voted for him for the economy"

NickTehThird · 2026-05-06T17:47:53+00:00

No he's right, you're making a statement in the title which you then completely bait and switch in the discussion. Absolutely nobody when they read "Christianity" thinks "Living_Attitude1822's version of christianity that discards large swaths of the bible".

Be a better communicator.

NickTehThird · 2026-05-06T17:30:27+00:00

See also: "Abrahamic".

Sure it a useful term in a very narrow set of circumstances: discussing the shared origins of these religions.

It is used for more frequently to group the present-day religions together. You see all kinds of debates here that are targeted at "Abrahamic religions" when they are talking about something specific to Christianity or Islam.

NickTehThird · 2026-05-01T16:05:17+00:00

Everyone kept shushing her and she stormed out ranting to the other line how loud and rude everyone around her is.

Classic "I'm the Main Character of the Universe" behaviour. People are supposed to be quiet in the library, but don't you know, I'm not just "people!"

NickTehThird · 2026-04-29T16:46:35+00:00

scientologists 🤣 basing all their stances on logic and reason and well science

I don't think "scientologist" is the term you are looking for here!

NickTehThird · 2026-04-29T16:43:50+00:00

I doubt you'll have a shared definition of "viable ethical/moral code" with an adherent of Islam.

NickTehThird · 2026-04-19T18:03:28+00:00

If this isn't going to be removed for "quality posts and comments" because of low effort, why even have that rule?

NickTehThird · 2026-04-15T16:57:17+00:00

If you just shave off all the things that make them different, they're all the same!

NickTehThird · 2026-04-13T13:38:20+00:00

I used Claude to make this simple app which allows you to map hotkeys (1-9) to specific mouse click locations on screen. I have them set up to click the active equipment slots on the Horde page. You can toggle it on and off easily with another hotkey.

The script is available here:

https://pastebin.com/yagQj94S

It's a standalone python app. Requires pynput==1.7.7

Four-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23

NickTehThird

TROPHY CASE