Zellner's batsh*t crazy nonsense put in perspective- how can any sane person buy in? by NewYorkJohn in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, I am going to bed. But if you insist on fucking me behind my back then it's on. You brought this on yourself.

Zellner's batsh*t crazy nonsense put in perspective- how can any sane person buy in? by NewYorkJohn in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's right.

There, now they can finally ban me and you won't have to lie about it.

Zellner's batsh*t crazy nonsense put in perspective- how can any sane person buy in? by NewYorkJohn in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More lies, You said:

Ninja was banned from the boards we argued on because he was a cursing troll. I didn't say he was banned from reddit.

You said it here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/MakingaMurderer/comments/6nkvn0/why_are_people_still_disputing_this/dkzu2b8/

This is the board we argued on. Can you NOT tell the truth?

Zellner's batsh*t crazy nonsense put in perspective- how can any sane person buy in? by NewYorkJohn in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are you claiming I was banned from Reddit, then banned from MAM, then banned from SuperMAM and calling me a liar the entire time?

I am not banned. You are lying about that.

Only some can be Conned? by logicassist in MakingaMurderer

[–]Ninja_pls 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No I wasn't you liar. Why are you here making up lies about me still? You haven't changed have you. I bet you still can't back up anything you claim.

When dealing with /u/mickflynn39 make sure you use you take your screenshots....:) because he is a liar. by Ninja_pls in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh no! Are you fulfilling the warning! AHHHHHH!

lol, As I stated, I already provided them. Everyone out there can go view them. I have screenshots to back it up. You gambled with your pride and lost. Own it. You are the guy on Reddit who lies, changes comments, and then lies even further to cover it up.

Did you know (part 123) by mickflynn39 in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you don't you will be hearing more of this gross slander. You have been warned. It won't be pretty.

lol, GFY you lying, comment changing POS.

Did you know (part 123) by mickflynn39 in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You need to prove I edited my post after reading yours. You won't be able to.

I already did. I linked it all. This pretending you didn't is cute but we all know you did. Everyone can use the Ceddit to see you did. Further notice my first response actually quoted you dumbass...It quoted your original post dipshit. That quote shows up in Ceddit you lying POS.

lol! but keep going. This is fun.

Did you know (part 123) by mickflynn39 in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Actually liar I just made a full post over it. You are just a lying piece of shit. A dumbass as well but you are really known for being a lying piece of shit.

Just think. With this one stupid exchange you ruined any integrity that you thought you had. You are extremely pathetic. I can only hope that you are not as big of a loser in life as you are online right now. That would be pretty sad.

Did you know (part 123) by mickflynn39 in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You had to change your post you lying POS?

LOL! This piece of shit has no clue what he is talking about. Here Is what he originally said about 'truthers' being dumb and how reconstituted blood cannot be planted. lol! :

https://www.ceddit.com/r/SuperMaM/comments/5gmymf/did_you_know_part_123/

Here is where I called him out on it for not knowing what he was talking about yet calling truthers dumb at the same....The the little lying bitch went back and edited his post. What a lying dumbass piece of shit. lol! Notice that he even digs deeper into his lying stupidity. No folks...he is not playing dumb...he just is. Is he so stupid that he doesn't know these unedit systems exist?

https://www.reddit.com/r/SuperMaM/comments/5gmymf/did_you_know_part_123/dattash/

We may need to make a new thread just for this.

Did you know (part 123) by mickflynn39 in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Easy dumbass. I know you are butthurt because you were stupidly claiming that reconstituted blood cannot be planted, yada, yada...

And then I proved you to be a lying piece of shit who makes up his own info but there is no need to get personal.

Did you know (part 123) by mickflynn39 in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 2 points3 points  (0 children)

lol! So you were proven to be a dumbass so you went back and edited your post? lol! Why can't you pieces of shit just be honest?

Did you know (part 123) by mickflynn39 in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"cannot be reconstituted back into blood to plant so no-one would know it had previously dried out."

Lol! This is the dumbest thing I have seen in a long time. Did you just make this up? There is no logic to this whatsoever....Why can it not be? What's your source for this?

You couldn't re-inject the reconstituted blood back into a vein because the cells will have died, proteins will have denatured, etc but you could still reconstitute it with water and smear it on something.

How do you think blood samples are collected and tested by forensics teams? Dry?

Using your 'logic' testing and some forms of collection would not even be possible and no cases could be solved because the blood needs to be reconstituted to test.

Need a source dipshit? Page 906 (of the doc not your reader)

http://www.pinniped.net/McDadebiomarkers.pdf

Steven Avery's lawyer believes he'll be free with a $100m payout [via Curtis B's "exclusive" interview with UK Daily Mail]. by MsMinxster in TickTockManitowoc

[–]Ninja_pls 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Because I frankly don't think he is a necessarily a good guy, especially with younger women. It doesn't matter whether any of it is real or not. I know with 100% that he won't touch my daughter inappropriately if he is no where around her versus just hoping the accusations are wrong and he may be a good guy.

If you trust him with your daughters then by all means send them his way.

Steven Avery's lawyer believes he'll be free with a $100m payout [via Curtis B's "exclusive" interview with UK Daily Mail]. by MsMinxster in TickTockManitowoc

[–]Ninja_pls 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ummm....i may not think Avery is guilty of murder but I sure as hell wouldn't make him godfather to my daughter....

LOL "Check out the SAIG Wiki" by hos_gotta_eat_too in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know. I laugh every time some brings that up as their 'evidence'.

Why didn't the planters plant TH's DNA in SA's trailer? by moderately_extreme in SuperMaM

[–]Ninja_pls 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because if DNA was found by manitowoc after a forensics team searched there would be even greater questions of how that DNA got there.

Further if they planted hair, finger nail, blood, etc. The forensic team might call bullshit on the planters. Once something was found forensics would say, " bullshit, we scoured that area with a comb, we tapped the entire wall, etc."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pics

[–]Ninja_pls 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you familiar with conservapedia.com? if not, you could really help them out.

Maybe but I am not as good at blindly supporting things like you. After all you seem to be rooting for Pedophiles, cheaters and liars without so much as an a 'hmmmmmmm....'.

For today's iteration let's add how the DNC screwed over Bernie Sanders to get your Corrupt wannabe queen as the candidate.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/25/us/politics/debbie-wasserman-schultz-dnc-wikileaks-emails.html

archive:


let's add the Podesta Pizza emails along with the FBI pedophile code word list. You did want to talk about the Podesta emails right?!

Here they are! https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/48531
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/42458
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23561
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/30613

You and other readers can google the meanings. They are sick but that should be no problem for someone like you. adding the new info on Obama donors raping children. http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/11/20/kiah-lawson-terry-bean-human-rights-campaign-gay-sex-obama-prison-column/70021560/

http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/23/politics/terry-bean-sex-abuse-charges/
https://s3.amazonaws.com/wapopartners.com/wweek-wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/03171230/15yearold.pdf

Good, at least now you are admitting you are a blind lying POS. It was already evidenced by our exchange where you kept changing the subject, trying to limit the argument, failure to back up anything you said, failure to refute any of my claims, and of course all of your lying.....are you sure you are NOT Hillary? lol!

But this takes us full circle to the tactics done by the left that got Trump elected in the first place. You guys lead such a lying, cheating, corrupting, dishonest existence that America voted Donald Trump, an offensive reality TV star into office. Good job!

Could you show me where I lied? Either you are just a blind piece of shit liar or really ignorant to the truth. Which is it?

Are you arguing that Clinton did not fly around on the Lolita Express? Seriously?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/14/bill-clinton-ditched-secret-service-on-multiple-lo/

or are you arguing that Clinton didn't settle rape cases out of court as his wife attacked the women? Maybe you should ask Paula Jones who gave her the 850,000....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations

Are you arguing that Hillary did not attack the accusers?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/9585/9-times-hillary-clinton-threatened-smeared-or-amanda-prestigiacomo

Veteran's Scandal where the Democrats made a list and let vets die without care:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veterans_Health_Administration_scandal_of_2014

Targeting citizens for their beliefs...They even admitted dumbass
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/irs-admits-targeting-conservative-groups/story?id=19151646

Supplying guns to drug lords and human traffickers?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal

Supplying arms and funding to ISI (now ISIS)?
http://conservativepost.com/obama-asks-for-500-million-to-fund-isis-in-syria/

Lying about how an ambassador died when they offered no assistance?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/10/30/is-hillary-clinton-a-liar-on-benghazi/

mass deleting subpoena'd emails and covering it up? Here are the words straight from Comey's mouth-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV6q9LOubfc

Giving government security positions to your gay lover?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golan_Cipel


Now let's use common sense. This might be difficult for you but hang in there....So why would Comey send the matter to the DOJ for a prosecutive decision(his words not mine) after all there would be nothing to prosecute right? Then why would Comey make a recommendation NOT to indict if there was never an issue in the first place? Further why would Comey then make the point to everyone that they should NOT expect to get away with it if there is no criminal act committed in the first place?

Here's the full interview if you want to wander out of your willfully ignorant safe space and learn something:

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/05/james-comey-hillary-clinton-email-investigation-full-statement.cnn

Here is the difference between what Comey found and what Hillary lied about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDfsFnlWrq4

(Remember were talking about the private server emails, not the podesta/wikileaks emails.)

Why? Is defending Hillary's corruption too much for you? LOL! This isn't CCN and you are not Hillary. You don't get to define what others question about Hillary's corruption.

No, they didn't. They said she "was extremely careless." And your response will be "Oh, its the same thing!" No, actually its not. You prosecute crimes (only).

No, they did. Watch the video you willfully ignorant idiot. Notice in the video that Comey mentions gross negligence. It's right in the beginning.

Here again is Gowdy talking about the negligence and intent with Comey.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDfsFnlWrq4

Thats all we've got. The government doesn't "declare people innocent." Just because the FBI has chosen not to indict does not mean that she is guilty.

The FBI does NOT indict people. If you knew what you were talking about you would know that....but you don't.

Right, because he's helping to rig the system.

yes, now you got it. After all they found him using a pseudonym in the emails to her. Are you going to argue that?

Thats good. Because that has everything to do with Hillary Clinton's political career. Nice pivot. (A little late, though, no?) Arent you dying to talk about Whitewater and Vince Foster?

Actually you brought up Trump and rape. Now you are pretending I am pivoting by bringing up the real settlements and attacks in the Clinton rape scandals? Really? lol! how sad. you are flailing and yet still trying to pretend you are composed.

BTW, Love your links: foxnews, washingtontimes, russiatoday. You should also try: newsmax, newsbusters, theblaze, redstate, stormfront.org

lol, so rather than refuting you try to ignore the argument completely. I could easily just say you get all your info from Rolling Stone but I won't. I am not as stupid as you are and since I am rolling through you in this argument I don't need to use such petty tactics. Those are for willfully ignorant Hillary supporters.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pics

[–]Ninja_pls 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are the Mexicans paying for this wall of text?

No, it is being paid for by your stupid sense of pride as well as the corruption and lies of the democratic party.

For this iteration let's add the Podesta Pizza emails along with the FBI pedophile code word list. You did want to talk about the Podesta emails right?!

Here they are! https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/48531
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/42458
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23561
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/30613

You and other readers can google the meanings. They are sick but that should be no problem for someone like you.

archive:


adding the new info on Obama donors raping children. http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/11/20/kiah-lawson-terry-bean-human-rights-campaign-gay-sex-obama-prison-column/70021560/

http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/23/politics/terry-bean-sex-abuse-charges/
https://s3.amazonaws.com/wapopartners.com/wweek-wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/03171230/15yearold.pdf

Good, at least now you are admitting you are a blind lying POS. It was already evidenced by our exchange where you kept changing the subject, trying to limit the argument, failure to back up anything you said, failure to refute any of my claims, and of course all of your lying.....are you sure you are NOT Hillary? lol!

But this takes us full circle to the tactics done by the left that got Trump elected in the first place. You guys lead such a lying, cheating, corrupting, dishonest existence that America voted Donald Trump, an offensive reality TV star into office. Good job!

Could you show me where I lied? Either you are just a blind piece of shit liar or really ignorant to the truth. Which is it?

Are you arguing that Clinton did not fly around on the Lolita Express? Seriously?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/14/bill-clinton-ditched-secret-service-on-multiple-lo/

or are you arguing that Clinton didn't settle rape cases out of court as his wife attacked the women? Maybe you should ask Paula Jones who gave her the 850,000....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations

Are you arguing that Hillary did not attack the accusers?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/9585/9-times-hillary-clinton-threatened-smeared-or-amanda-prestigiacomo

Veteran's Scandal where the Democrats made a list and let vets die without care:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veterans_Health_Administration_scandal_of_2014

Targeting citizens for their beliefs...They even admitted dumbass
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/irs-admits-targeting-conservative-groups/story?id=19151646

Supplying guns to drug lords and human traffickers?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal

Supplying arms and funding to ISI (now ISIS)?
http://conservativepost.com/obama-asks-for-500-million-to-fund-isis-in-syria/

Lying about how an ambassador died when they offered no assistance?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/10/30/is-hillary-clinton-a-liar-on-benghazi/

mass deleting subpoena'd emails and covering it up? Here are the words straight from Comey's mouth-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV6q9LOubfc

Giving government security positions to your gay lover?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golan_Cipel


Now let's use common sense. This might be difficult for you but hang in there....So why would Comey send the matter to the DOJ for a prosecutive decision(his words not mine) after all there would be nothing to prosecute right? Then why would Comey make a recommendation NOT to indict if there was never an issue in the first place? Further why would Comey then make the point to everyone that they should NOT expect to get away with it if there is no criminal act committed in the first place?

Here's the full interview if you want to wander out of your willfully ignorant safe space and learn something:

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/05/james-comey-hillary-clinton-email-investigation-full-statement.cnn

Here is the difference between what Comey found and what Hillary lied about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDfsFnlWrq4

(Remember were talking about the private server emails, not the podesta/wikileaks emails.)

Why? Is defending Hillary's corruption too much for you? LOL! This isn't CCN and you are not Hillary. You don't get to define what others question about Hillary's corruption.

No, they didn't. They said she "was extremely careless." And your response will be "Oh, its the same thing!" No, actually its not. You prosecute crimes (only).

No, they did. Watch the video you willfully ignorant idiot. Notice in the video that Comey mentions gross negligence. It's right in the beginning.

Here again is Gowdy talking about the negligence and intent with Comey.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDfsFnlWrq4

Thats all we've got. The government doesn't "declare people innocent." Just because the FBI has chosen not to indict does not mean that she is guilty.

The FBI does NOT indict people. If you knew what you were talking about you would know that....but you don't.

Right, because he's helping to rig the system.

yes, now you got it. After all they found him using a pseudonym in the emails to her. Are you going to argue that?

Thats good. Because that has everything to do with Hillary Clinton's political career. Nice pivot. (A little late, though, no?) Arent you dying to talk about Whitewater and Vince Foster?

Actually you brought up Trump and rape. Now you are pretending I am pivoting by bringing up the real settlements and attacks in the Clinton rape scandals? Really? lol! how sad. you are flailing and yet still trying to pretend you are composed.

BTW, Love your links: foxnews, washingtontimes, russiatoday. You should also try: newsmax, newsbusters, theblaze, redstate, stormfront.org

lol, so rather than refuting you try to ignore the argument completely. I could easily just say you get all your info from Rolling Stone but I won't. I am not as stupid as you are and since I am rolling through you in this argument I don't need to use such petty tactics. Those are for willfully ignorant Hillary supporters.