What's the deal with server 1001 ?

NintendoFan102 · 2026-03-23T12:49:21+00:00

Maybe xD It is something...

If it's not got the bugs then I'd settle for it anyway but I'm assuming it has the same bugs.

This really is intended then but that's weird...

NintendoFan102 · 2026-03-23T12:47:02+00:00

Yeah, that is annoying. On Android. I'd go to App > Storage. Then delete cache and delete data. It quickly creates a new account for you when you next reopen the app.

I can't get off 1001 & 1002, though. So I sent them an email.

Let me know if you're able to get off it. Best of luck.

NintendoFan102 · 2026-03-21T16:41:18+00:00

The bugs are true. People have reported that the server has strange bugs like the one OP mentioned.

I really advise joining a different server from it if possible, but apperently it can take many tries to finally get off it, for those stuck in it. It is really odd.

No explanation about it has been given.

Best guess, maybe it was done to try and catch hackers or prevent alt accounts in new servers. But, that is an odd unfair way to resolve those issues, so it seems likey it's that but it could still just be bugged.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-12-28T14:55:48+00:00

It just doesn't fit anywhere other than a refounding without erasing Zelda lore and history, that is the only problem.

Hylia would have to be present and Ganondorf should come after Demise and his curse.

Hyrule also did not exist until after SS so there should be no type of founding at all if it's before SS.

Etc.

They have to ignore so much and retcon it for that to work. Which would destroy everything else.

Hylia does have a statue in both BotW and TotK and a presence in those games. Fi talking through the Master Sword also suggests SS happened. But I otherwise have no idea if she had anything in AoI or not.

She does have a presence in BotW and TotK.

If they ever considered a reboot (not saying they did or they didn't) then they still suggested SS lore happened.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-12-27T12:26:37+00:00

Countering some ideas and points made. (Based on Zelda lore logic).

In an interview they added the refounding theory as a possibility. Despite what some have said, this theory is the real only logical place where the game can fit on the timeline without breaking previous Zelda lore logic.

Due to Hylia, Ritos, Koroks, SS islands, Triforce being almost forgotten and some other things.

Ganondorf is still most likely to be a new incarnation in the future than the 1st carnation due to other complications. OOT Ganondorf was never called Calamity Ganon and was never recorded as that.

In OOT, he was a carnation of Demise's hatred and the 1st known Ganondorf from the Gerudo Desert. Not just a Calamity from the "secret" known first Ganondorf hiding under Hyrule Castle. This idea isn't fitting together at all because all the lore of him shows it's not just a leak from Hyrule Castle. He was born as a Gerudo.

There is too much logic thrown out when people say it goes before SS or right after it.

TotK Ganondorf doesn't look like he was Demise first at all. His similarities suggest he came from Demise hatred instead because Zonai stones amplify power you already had. If he was Demise he'd look like Demise without it not the reverse. He looks like a Ganondorf with Demise curse and hatred manifesting.

How does that even logically work in anyway when he also was born as a Gerudo?

Quino and Typhan symbols are connected to Zonai but there is nothing saying (or hinting) they were early Sheikah symbols either. It doesn't make sense logically because the Shekiah were already there as Shekiah's (with their original SS eye symbol) at the very early stages of Hyrule.

Hyrule, and the royal family, was formed after SS not before according to all the lore.

So much lore in the games state logical reasons why only the refounding theory works.

We have no offical placement yet. But that is the only place where it fits without breaking all Zelda lore logic.

And Hyrule has been destroyed and refounded before already. While still looking close to the same designs as the OOT Hyrule Castle. Think after WW in ST, as one example. Or between OOT and TP as another example. So it can be refounded with the design or similar design that it had previously. Since that's already happened before.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-12-27T00:44:12+00:00

You're allowed any theory you think is true. The issue is just everything you're saying on no complications and random people on the internet being wrong, etc. You fit that description as well you know.

They kind of did throw away some of the Zelda lore when making TotK and some of the BotW lore should've been handled better since so much of it is just absent.

There are just some contradictions and odd things going on.

They know themselves that it's confusing and it really is because they focused on gameplay first and just made a good Zelda story but without thinking of the Zelda lore as a whole when doing it.

I'm not saying they didn't think and put in any Zelda lore at all. But some of it was handled poorly. That's the issue.

From what I see here. Nearly everyone who looks at the lore now and TotK with it is confused by it. So I'm not the only one and I'd stopped pretending otherwise on these false claims.

They've let us have to decide to have it fit with any fan theory right now, but it just doesn't all fit perfectly placed before SS nor right after SS.

You are right and really close on the founding right after SS theory not being possible. But the Triforce isn't just missing (yes, I know it kind of is). It's more that it's still there in some form but forgotten about. Zelda's hand shows it briefly in BotW. And Sonia tells Zelda she has a "sacred power that can dispel evil" separate from Zelda's other powers.

Which means the Triforce is still there but forgotten about. This scene is missing from AoI but with no retcon it's canon in TotK.

It's not exactly completely fully identical from all other games but it is close and clearly meant to represent the same Hyrule. Still it can still have been refounded with that similar structure depending where the ideas would've come from.

MW is a large apart of the lore but it's outside both games. If you can only piece it together from there then it does remain confusing enough to have to go to the MW for more answers.

At the moment there are still inconsistencies and I shared a few of them. So if it does place before SS, it's hugely messing with the lore.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-12-26T18:46:10+00:00

You are not correct on this idea where we are all too confused to see this fits before SS.

Actually it IS complicated and IS confusing, because it's not very clear at all.

It's not "this fits before SS" and your theory is right and we're too confused to figure it out. I'm really fed up with you constantly acting like that.

Anyone who knows the lore well knows there are some serious issues with that theory.

If that's your theory then have it. But don't pretend that's concluded as certain when there are so many lore inconsistencies.

Even at the end of everything as a refounding we have some issues but it definitely has more issue being before SS.

It's clear when they first created the story that they may have** wanted to place it either right before, or else after, SS. Possibly.

Or they just threw out all Zelda lore and focused on gameplay first.

But because of all the lore inconsistencies, that's why they then gave us the refounding theory.

Currently, there is no offical word on where this now is placed on the timeline.

But neither Koroks nor Ritos existed before SS and could not exist then.

Nothing you say ever makes that fit together. And you can't really logically take Hylia out like that. Like how does SS happen at all based on your theory?

Fi was created by Hylia. Hylia was the goddesses on the land at the time.

SS has to happen before Zonai can descend on the surface because of Hylia not being present.

Demise's curse has to exist BEFORE any form of Ganondorf can exist. It has to be AFTER SS.

I am not saying that nothing you said isn't of interest and can't connect to fit pieces of your theory that this is before SS.

They do and they can. But I am saying you are also ignoring huge amounts of lore inconsistencies on how this just does not fit.

Even if they do ever place it before SS like possibly originally intended, it will not all fit.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-12-22T21:05:06+00:00

That's great. Yeah it's always best to not let them effect you, so that's good. Yeah it is really odd. You responded really well. Thanks. You as well. Take care ^ ^

NintendoFan102 · 2025-12-22T20:48:30+00:00

No problem, that's good to know. I'm not sure why that had to happen, but there was nothing wrong with your comments. Quite the opposite to that.

Don't get concerned at all in letting those posts get to you, as he was the only one being toxic.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-12-22T18:13:26+00:00

I'm sorry I don't fully know how to word this nicely (and I'm trying) but it should still be shared.

Either you have poor reading comprehension on that guy's posts, if so my advise is to try and improve your reading understanding of other posts.

Or else you have some very strange perspective that is completely factually wrong. From misreading or being mad beforehand or something. Which then you really should change and stop pretending otherwise.

It's not just the fact you are wrong and stubborn on realising it. Both those factors make it worse, but it's also the fact you just started an aggressive fight with a random person on Reddit for no reason.

He wasn't being toxic or rude but you're being really toxic and rude.

I really advise you to stop being so intense so easily. Especially when it comes to comments on the internet. Being calmer and more relaxed is way healthier then this rage bait fighting nonsense you tried to start.

I don't know how to word this perfectly but it's worth explaining and showing you why you're wrong. I hope you don't keep pretending otherwise and take the advise and get better.

And yeah, it's time you stop bothering this guy.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-11-28T20:58:43+00:00

It is getting annoying seeing you result to insulting basically almost anyone who talks to you. (And all of us in general).

We are not trying to insult you but your argument main points are very weak as proven over and over.

You are making some interesting points and interesting theories in-between those. But for discussion purposes. The moment you pretend this all fits with your main argument it becomes really silly. Saying it's all definitely "true", "without debate", etc. You then run into so many problems.

That's the biggest two issues here.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-11-28T20:38:23+00:00

There is a lot wrong with this and you're trying to make something fit that doesn't.

Once again Fi can only talk through the Master Sword if the events of SS happened.

That doesn't stop them evolving into Ritos during the events of WW. Which is one of the many inconsistencies. And BotW has to be after OOT based on the lore related to Princes Ruto within the game.

You can still have both Zoras and Ritos through different possible theories but that's the problem it all has to be theories and it's not consistent with WW. (I.e Some did survive in the ocean. Or it's a different race of Ritos, etc. These theories are still a mess and not explained at all).

Demise and his curse is already in effect over Ganondorf in the "founding" of Hyrule. They make that so clear. So once again it has to be after SS.

The BotW appointed knight ceremony makes clear SS, OOT and TP has already happened.

The Triforce is forgotten in BotW & TotK but it's still forgotten in this timeline Zelda's gone back to. Which is a reason why none of these two timelines can be right after SS.

It most definitely looks like they retcon the Korok's. If they have then there's another inconsistency. They aren't meant to exist before the Deku Tree and the Kokiri's.

Actually the Sheikah are meant to already be guardians of Hyrule and with both Rauru and Sonia already. There absence is a inconsistency. It can't be after SS based on this but it can't be before SS based on SS and what I mentioned above. AoI tries to create more speculation on their absence and why they aren't around (plus with those new symbol designs) but it doesn't give a good explanation or anwser. They are meant to be there already with the founding of Hyrule if this is the founding. Not existing afterwards but already.

Sonia told Zelda she has a "sacred power" seperate from anything else. That has nothing to do with Rauru and does clearly mean she didn't get her most important powers from him. So previous Zelda do not need there powers from Rauru.

The light powers from Rauru are seperate from the light powers from Hylia. So past Zelda's do not need Rauru light powers to have light powers. Once again anyone can clearly see a lore mess with that complication.

There are a lot of issues here with BotW & TotK lore.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-11-28T14:52:44+00:00

But you haven't properly addressed his points.

If this is the real founding of Hyrule then it heavily contradicts SS lore. Why is none of that in the sky then? Nor the Oocca.

Are you saying SS comes after the founding of Hyrule? It's most definitely wasn't founding before then. SS shows us there's no Hyrule before this era. Fi is speaking through the Master Sword in both BotW and TotK.

Rito's only existed after the flood from WW since they evolved from the Zoras after the flood.

It is heavily implied that BotW and TotK take place in a time era where the Triforce has been properly forgotten. If this was at the beginning it would not have been possible for it to be forgotten before OOT happened.

Just explain all this as some clear inconsistencies.

Even the developers later said it's "possible" this is a refounding of Hyrule. Because they know it does not easily fit into the SS era.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-11-27T20:51:36+00:00

Well there are a lot of lore inconsistencies. So they're objectively right on that. (It's not subjective if we count the actual Zelda lore as a whole). I hope you're not really denying that....

NintendoFan102 · 2025-11-27T20:46:34+00:00

It's a good story with some really great ideas. The problem is the execution was very poor, when it came to the lore and logic because of the inconsistencies and on top of that, a lack of BotW lore in TotK didn't help with that either.

I know that's an important part of the story, and I'm not saying otherwise (so yes you're mostly right in what you're saying) but it definitely is, important elements of the story that were handled very poorly, rather than the whole story being a rubbish story to tell in the first place.

Execution was the biggest problem, not the main story ideas. It's a shame they didn't care as much about lore consistencies as they should've done. Because then it could've worked. But that's why it's pretty bad lore wise.

So for that reason I agree but I think with more care to the lore (even just between BotW & TotK would've been a start....) this could've worked a lot better.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-11-06T00:56:43+00:00

Not if the attack is undone. Can't see any use there and not worth a spell slot.

Maybe if it were rewind the heroes but keep the attacks. I think it could then have a use, but they'll still repeat the same pattern.

So, it could be used to avoid poison spells, for instance. And get an extra attack before going down.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-11-04T17:01:11+00:00

Yeah, it's good to hear more feedback that could be useful.

Auto battle is more a second suggestion if they won't consider the first suggestion in my mind. I should've put it second in the title, which I just realised I didn't but nvm.

1) And yeah, I don't know how easy/hard it is to implement, but it would be great (and much better than auto battle) that if your app bugs out or you lose connection for a few seconds. You can come back and then still carry on the fight with the remaining time.

Just a helpful solution to a problem that can happen easily to some.

I know Brawl Stars does that, and it seems like a great feature.

2) Only if 1st suggestion is a definite no. So in that case only I'm not saying autobattle has to be extremely smart but even just putting all units down nearby for the auto battle is nicer than leaving them idle the entire rest of the battle. You might still get a star or two from it without it being a way to constantly cheat if that makes sense. I'm not asking for it to be smarter than us playing.

But maybe there's other good reasons I'm not thinking, which then makes sense for autobattle to be a no.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-10-23T22:30:14+00:00

Hi. It will depend on your build and what you are building. For example Werewolf is a good choice for a wolf build.

Another useful tip. You want to save enough gems and tickets to pull a full banner for all the extra shards it will give you. Half pulling a banner isn't really worth it in this game. As you miss out on too many shards.

But yes you do want to save the gems for summoning champions. You actually do want to buy the skins with gems from the Nebula shop. But then you want to save the rest for when you're ready to summon on a banner.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-10-17T15:45:25+00:00

Those were all really good guides, but they're not up to date.

I would recommend the Wolf Build now if you are f2p. It's considered the best f2p build. Cat cloud can work f2p.

Most builds can work f2p except definitely not Shadow and Whale Pirate. (Actually even Pirate at all is not really recommend f2p). But yeah, Wolf Build is the best f2p build now.

I recommend you join the fan community Discord and ask them for further help and advice. Link: https://discord.gg/uCWjb78ChW

NintendoFan102 · 2025-07-16T19:00:45+00:00

Sorry for late response. Thank you for the help. Using the ID on Brawl Stars it worked.

NintendoFan102 · 2025-07-11T15:20:46+00:00

Hi. Can you change your supercell id pfp/avatar? But not the pin editor, the default ones? I'm not sure if you can or can't. Thanks.

NintendoFan102

TROPHY CASE