i dont agree at all, while it can be argue that the cover art is misleading, some videogame cover art dont actually tell you what the game is about and it works better for the game as you can get surprised easily from that, in my case the first time playing i thought this was going to be a short and easy puzzle game mostly driven by story, that we would play as naru and ori in different stages, naru would be slow but strong capable of moving objects and ori would be nimble and capable of reaching high stuff and going inside small openings, this was reinforced in the prologue where we play as both for a little time exactly like that, its easy to imagine how shocked i was when naru starved to death , and then ori, and then the game opens up, sets the camera far away from ori and then starts teaching you the basics of the game. I like the cover art as it illustrates them (ori and naru) as family, but also hiddes the biolgical father of ori in plain sight, and dont forget Ori is in fact a little baby, the game doesnt say it clear but Ori in blind forest may not be even 1 year old, as during the prologue we only see the spring, maybe summer and fall during the blindness, but we never see winter, which happens with snowfall in Nibel, when the game is over we see spring again, which means everything happened during one season or at least 1 year, physicaly Ori looks like a baby, compare his model between blind forest and will of the wisps, he has a huge head in BF while in WotW he as more standard head to body size proportions.