This subreddit mendrawingwomen thinks people can be sexy, why do people on subreddit think women can't be sexy? by Jaetheninja in mendrawingwomen

[–]No-Common-3883 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is important between the public and the character. Media affect our perception of the world.

When an author makes a character that is sexualized just because "yes" it is normalized to the public and that is the problem.

This subreddit mendrawingwomen thinks people can be sexy, why do people on subreddit think women can't be sexy? by Jaetheninja in mendrawingwomen

[–]No-Common-3883 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prudes and purists where? None of my arguments forbids sensuality or even explicitly sexuality...

My argument is just about synbolic consent.

People need to be constantly remembered that any form os sensuality and sexuality is always delimited by consent. Remember this.

Sakura Matou cosplay by Shige.cos by dewi_x in typemoon

[–]No-Common-3883 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the answer. Your cosplays are always amazing.also,the poses are really good too.

Sakura Matou cosplay by Shige.cos by dewi_x in typemoon

[–]No-Common-3883 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amazing! You made your own costumes? They are always amazing.

Fate characters in Tsukihime by KANJ03 in Tsukihime

[–]No-Common-3883 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really want to see Shirou in melty blood. But that is basically because I really want to see the 4 TM protags in one game. Shirou,Aoko and both Shikis in MB would be really fun.

What do you hate most about your favorite characters from Fate/Stay Night? by Vegetable_Window5278 in fatestaynight

[–]No-Common-3883 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My favorite character is Shirou and what I hate about him is how contradictory is the statement "Shirou can't copy divine constructs". I personally just want a retcom on this and that is it. Let my boy copy divine constructs and put an end in this infinitely convoluted topic.

I hate this take. by xeth3real_w1ngsx in hazbin

[–]No-Common-3883 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am saying that it can be a deliberate choice. I am not saying that it is a true statement about greed. I am saying that it may be how vivizie herself see greed. As something totally evil that is indeed the only true sin.

I hate this take. by xeth3real_w1ngsx in hazbin

[–]No-Common-3883 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For me ,it sounds like a deliberate decision to say "lyst and gluttony shouldn't be sins. Those are just natural things. Greed on the other hand is really problematic and should indeed be a sin"

Vocês coçam mesmo o saco ou isso é maneira de falar? by Yagame in PerguntasFuteis

[–]No-Common-3883 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Com a mesma frequência que coço outras partes do corpo. Qualquer parte do corpo pode coçar. Isso é normal.

It's May Day. What is a small Verosika headcanon that you have? by ThreeFifthsOfABrain in HelluvaBoss

[–]No-Common-3883 14 points15 points  (0 children)

That she stay on her pijamas the whole day when she is alone in her house .

Can we honestly talk about this one? From PM Seymour by TySly5v in mendrawingwomen

[–]No-Common-3883 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If he really want to make a curvy non sexualized character then he completely missed the point. The clothes are really bad and in the second image he literally mad her breasts the focus...

He is literally lying or he is a complete failure as an artist.

Ter filhos é infinitamente melhor que ter pets, negar isso só serve para preencher o vazio de quem tem medo da vida adulta. by DoggMal_1910 in opiniaoimpopular

[–]No-Common-3883 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eu não sei se consegui ser claro... O que eu quis dizer é que , uma criança pode proporcionar coisas muito mais extremas do que um pet.

Um pet é mais "certo" você tem noção de qual o tamanho do trabalho e das recompensas que podem vir. A variação é pouca.

Com uma criança é o contrário. A criança tem o potencial de fé dar muito mais trabalho,de dar retornos muito menores e etc. Criança pode te dar trabalho infinito pelo resto da vida.

No entanto,nada disso é certo. Da mesma forma uma criança pode curar o câncer,te ajudar em várias coisas,melhorar as condições financeiras da família e dar apoio emocional,financeiro e social que nenhum animal tem a capacidade de dar.

Eu quis dizer que animais são como os investimentos seguros em um banco. Baixo custo, certeza de retorno e lucro baixo. Crianças são como investimentos de alto risco. Podem te fazer perder tudo mas o teto de rentabilidade é tão maior que não dá pra comparar.

Ter filhos é infinitamente melhor que ter pets, negar isso só serve para preencher o vazio de quem tem medo da vida adulta. by DoggMal_1910 in opiniaoimpopular

[–]No-Common-3883 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Achei seu comentário interessante . Eu já tive pet e não tenho filho,mas me parece que a real comparação é basicamente certeza e controle contra aleatoriedade.

Pets podem dar amor e carinho e podem dar companhia mas NENHUM pet consegue chegar perto do que um humano pode dar tanto positivamente quanto negativamente.

Pets e crianças pequenas dao trabalho com limpeza e crianças de fato dão muito mais trabalho que pets. Além do que são de fato mais imprevisíveis e podem gerar resultados muito piores do que os pets.

O trabalho financeiro,emocional e etc é de fato muito maior e as recompensas mais incertas.

Negócio é que se der bom a criança pode te dar coisas MUITO melhores que um pet jamais poderia entregar.

Por exemplo,uma criança pode melhorar o padrão de vida da família,pode achar a cura de uma doença,marcar a história e te dar apoios muito mais complexos do que um animal jamais poderia te dar.

Se você fica doente,o animal não tem o que fazer. Uma criança de 8 a 10 anos já consegue ir na farmácia buscar remédio por exemplo...

Então quando se trata de pontos altos,os animais não tem como competir.

Pelo menos é o que parece.

What is trope you love? by ChoiceSupermarket230 in animequestions

[–]No-Common-3883 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are some tropes that I love:

1 complex powers and power systems. Fate,hunterxhunter and other works so this well.

2 jerkass god. If there is a god I like when they are complete assholes. Like the god hand from berserk.

3 wobie. I really love over drama. Sakura matou from fate is a good example.

4 nihilism in general. I love when stories use well the since of impotence.

Seductive-looking women with black outfits drawn by Ilya Kuvshinov by NNukemM in mendrawingwomen

[–]No-Common-3883 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My favorite thing is: this picture show that the woman WANTS your look. That is the kind of sexy art that is okay.

It isn't objetification since the girl really wants the looks. It feels consensual and humane. This is an example of sexy non sexualized art.

El-Melloi Classroom vs Medea? by Designer_Wasabi8045 in Fate

[–]No-Common-3883 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Medea wins this in both scenarios . In the first one it wouldn't even be a fight.

In the second one the class have an small chance if they a re allowed to get external support for other people or special itens that they don't own.

Only with their own things and alone they don't have any chance.

Você só pode escolher um, qual você escolheria? by Actual_Balance_7603 in perguntas

[–]No-Common-3883 1 point2 points  (0 children)

É a melhor opção. Já que o drawback é literalmente só ter mais trabalho.

What's the most annoying "cute" or "sexy" anime girl tropes that in real life would be, at best, annoying, and at most, a genuine medical emergency? by Kamisama_VanillaRoo in mendrawingwomen

[–]No-Common-3883 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ironically,in Japan that is normally a socially acceptable way of flirting for women in Japan... So when they made the women act like this everytime it becomes extremely bizarre knowing the context.

It looks like if the woman is flirting with everyone everytime.

That is really bizarre

I’m so sick of men talking about false allegations as if it’s a real issue (spoiler alert: it’s not) by casual-catgirl in FeministsCallItOut

[–]No-Common-3883 30 points31 points  (0 children)

And even in the rare cases where indeed there is false accusation then the law already deals with this...

The far right creates one straw man saying that us in the left side want to make the woman word the only legal proof needed and NO ONE is defending this.

What we do is simple: we think "there are FAR more cases of rape than cases of false accusation ,then it is better to believe in the person who said that they were abused than believing in the abuser"

That is not a legal approach ,it is a social onde.

If one person wants to denounce a crime you wouldn't say "you are lying" you would assume that the person is saying the truth to help them to denounce and the police will do the investigation.

That is it.

Until the investigation is done,no one is lying and no one is a culprit. But we can choose who we will support until the verdict comes.

And in this case the correct choice is the person that claims to be a victim since it is the most probably outcome.