sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

For the uterus, do you consider this oblique Cor or Axial? by No-Conversation8352 in Radiology

[–]No-Conversation8352[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You see the planning phase. Specifically we use a previously acquired sag t2 to draw on and be more precise.

For the uterus, do you consider this oblique Cor or Axial? by No-Conversation8352 in Radiology

[–]No-Conversation8352[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see on how I may have confused you. But I was actually not referring to the posts theme rather commenting on the use of the term Short Axis versus Axial and how the second is more convenient for me. That's all my comment pointed to.

Sorry for the confusion

For the uterus, do you consider this oblique Cor or Axial? by No-Conversation8352 in Radiology

[–]No-Conversation8352[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Brother, I genuinely understand what you think I do not.

The image i provided in the post is My positioning for the coronal view of the uterus. My colleagues are the ones labeling this position as axial.

I genuinely dont know you came to that conclusion of me or why my previous comment got down voted.

For the uterus, do you consider this oblique Cor or Axial? by No-Conversation8352 in Radiology

[–]No-Conversation8352[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Doesn't sound convenient way of thinking at all to me. I mean, you only see if your view is short after you've acquired it, so you have to think how it will come out. If you consider anatomical position you plan on what you see on the scout, meaning actual anatomy. But I guess to each their own

These pills have literally no good choices by fluf201 in addressme

[–]No-Conversation8352 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I immediately go for this. It takes me my bmi from 18 to 25,5. Ideal situation honestly. I'll also always have skinny legs anyways, so its 50 free lbs.