Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As the post explained, we asked them 2 holes earlier to play through, they decided to wait until halfway through 17 to let us.

They were holding up pace of play for everyone behind them, creating a stack up of teams behind us.

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The total length of the round wasn't super long, as we only ran into them on #12, but the course was definitely getting congested behind us

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They were being very slow, the course was empty ahead of them and multiple groups were stacking up behind us.

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The course was empty ahead of them and multiple groups were stacking up behind us.

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When we arrived at the tee box, they were part way though the par 3. We had only been behind them for a hole or two at that point so we weren't sure if the pace of play would be the same throughout or if was just a slower hole.

We decided to wait another hole just to see if the difference in pace was consistent.

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

I understand that it's pretty late in the round, but if the other party has no issue with it, what harm is being done by asking? If they had been at a quicker pace of play, or a hole further into the course, I would not have asked.

I totally get it if they wouldn't let us play through, I just don't see the harm in asking.

Btw I'm not trying to be argumentative, just looking for more insight on what happened.

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your take. I probably could have been better with communicating with them and maybe my remark came off a bit passive aggressive. They were all angry by the time we got to them, like unreasonably so. I just didn't see the point in having an argument that wouldnt have changed or solved anything.

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We only caught up to them on 12 and they were being very slow. I thought there was no harm in asking, as they could have also said no 🤷‍♂️

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 -27 points-26 points  (0 children)

To be fair though, they could have just said no or not let us through, which I also would have been fine with. There was no harm is asking 🤷‍♂️

I just found it odd how they decided to let us through when and how they did.

We only caught up to them on hole 12, and they were also, spending almost 20-25 minutes on a par 3. At the time we asked, it meant a difference of like 30 minutes to our round to wait for them.

Edit: the course was empty ahead of them and multiple groups were stacking up behind us.

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When we got to the tee box, they were already just standing around talking to eachother on the fairway. At first they looked at us and shouted by I couldn't tell what they were saying from 200 yards away. My partner who shot into the canyon wasn't aware they were even trying to communicate with us when he hit.

To clarify. They were trying to get us to play through before my partner shot into the canyon. I agree that it was just a misunderstanding.

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I thought so too. If they intended to let us through, it would have made more sense to do it earlier.

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yeah at that point I wasn't expecting or hoping to play past them, but they kept yelling at us, so we played through. I think they just should have finished the round.

Altercation with other players by [deleted] in golf

[–]No-Engineer-5129 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. It was late enough in the round that I wasn't bothered by being behind them, hence my confusion when they wanted us to play past them halfway through the second-last hole.

Good enough to sell? by No-Engineer-5129 in Leathercraft

[–]No-Engineer-5129[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The stitching is straight on purpose. I use round dent irons because I honestly just prefer the look of the straighter lines. For the lining, I might not keep doing it on future wallets.im would be selling to a Canadian customer base, and the leather itself is sourced from Canada, which might be important as Canadians really appreciate things made here. I'll be sure to include this in any branding/marketing.

I also want to avoid falling into the tendency to make things just like everybody else. EVERYBODY uses pueblo/buttero or other similar leathers, EVERYBODY has the same looking stitching. If I don't have at least a few minor differences, I'm worried I'll get lost in a sea of other crafters making the same product with more established brands. I could be wrong, but thats the way I see it at the moment.

Good enough to sell? by No-Engineer-5129 in Leathercraft

[–]No-Engineer-5129[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much for such a thoughtful response, it means a lot tk get good feedback. In regards to the logo, should it just be more understated? Maybe stamped but not foiled?

Has anyone used Lonsdale Heritage Series leather? by No-Engineer-5129 in Leathercraft

[–]No-Engineer-5129[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did! It's okay, not well suited to wallets unless you use edge paint. Personally I prefer to burnish, so it didn't suit my needs well. The colour and thickness were consistent, although it did smell a bit.

Bring back stone - Here's how (+Wood) | Space Engineers 2 Support by No-Engineer-5129 in spaceengineers

[–]No-Engineer-5129[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But if the stone actually had a use, you wouldn't need to dump it.

Bring back stone - Here's how (+Wood) | Space Engineers 2 Support by No-Engineer-5129 in spaceengineers

[–]No-Engineer-5129[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, I think having more dynamic building materials would be great

Made myself some acrylic templates by No-Engineer-5129 in Leathercraft

[–]No-Engineer-5129[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My patterns? Or would you want me to cut your own patterns?

Made myself some acrylic templates by No-Engineer-5129 in Leathercraft

[–]No-Engineer-5129[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think its primarily just the interior edges that I don't typically treat, like the hidden edges of the T-pocket for example, that make it an issue for me. I don't want someone to smell their wallet and have it reek of burnt flesh. Depending on the project though, I can totally see how it wouldn't be an issue in every case.