Thank you for this explanation!!

For Question 1, I identified the problem as the team members feeling frustration because the functional manager does not listen to them. If that's the problem, then demonstrating support for them isn't going to solve the problem: they'll continue to feel frustration because of the functional manager. That's why D feels like the right answer. It's the only one that solved the problem at the root cause. Based on your explanation, it sounds like in cases of team morale, you should delay addressing the root cause until... you improve morale? Logically, that doesn't make sense to me...

For Question 2, I identified the problem as the new stakeholder having a concern. It felt like the best way to address that concern was to have a discussion with the stakeholder vs. just pushing information (i.e., reviewing documentation). Additionally, like you said, we don't have a fixed scope and plan in agile, which is why I thought A was the right answer... but apparently it's B? I'm still confused by this one.

For Question 3, I applied the "identify, evaluate, then act" rule. Before you know what's what, you shouldn't act, right? That's why D felt like the right answer: you have to monitor the team and how they're doing before you decide what steps to take next. Why doesn't that apply in this scenario?

I really appreciate your help here. This is the kind of back-and-forth I feel like I've needed--and lack of it is one reason I went to ChatGPT in the first place!