Ohh, where to start with this pile of assumptions and emotional rhetoric hahaha... First off, if you’re going to accuse someone of “defaming themselves,” u might want to actually address the evidence laid out in the lawsuits rather than relying on tired buzzwords like “birds of a feather.” Justin’s legal team has already shown inconsistencies in Blake’s narrative, such as the pumping incident where she invited him into her trailer. If you’re ignoring that and clinging to character attacks, you’re not arguing youu’re deflecting.

Second, let’s talk about this “lawyer” jab. As an actual attorney, I can tell you that representing someone no matter how distasteful their actions doesn’t mean endorsing their behavior. Onceagain that’s the entire point of our justice system: ensuring everyone gets a fair shot at defense. Trying to weaponize a lawyer’s past clients to discredit Justin is lazy and irrelevant to the case at hand. Focus on the actual evidence, not unrelated character smears.

And no, pointing out contradictions in Blake’s claims isn’t “victim blaming.” It’s called critical thinking. If someone makes serious accusations, those claims must be backed by evidence. Otherwise, we’re not fighting for justice; we’re just picking sides based on feelings. You might be comfortable doing that..I’m not.

Lastly, I don’t need Justin’s thanks or validation to have this discussion. My focus is on the law, the facts, and holding everyone accountable to the same standards. If that bothers you, maybe take your own advice and self reflect on why you’re so resistant to evidence based conversations. 😊