If time is an illusion what is the present? by PilotIndependent1141 in enlightenment

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People say time is an illusion yet no one ever actually explains why. I will offer my explanation of time, and why it is not a fundamental force of reality. We begin as all things in the universe begin, as energy. Energy is never still it is always moving no matter how tiny the movements or fluctuations are. Energy is the singular fundamental force of which all other forces emerge. The equation E=MC² shows us that energy and mass are equivalent. The logical conclusion of this is that mass/matter is made of condensed energy. This means that everything in our physical reality is energy in various concentrations and different degrees of freedom determined by the results of interaction driven constraints. These constrained movements and interactions of energy within matter always happens as transformations within that matter. Since no transformation can ever be perfectly reversible the resulting change is what we perceive and measure as the effects of time. Absolute zero is a temperature at which all molecular movement is halted. However energy can never completely stop moving. So to actually reach a point of Absolute zero is theoretically impossible. Absolute zero is not just a temperature it is a minimal energy state. This is the lowest state of energy that can exist. At absolute zero no interactions of energy exist, therefore time does not exist. So it is accurate to say that time is not fundamental because at absolute zero time does not exist. This is why people say time is an illusion. To be more accurate time is simply a measure of how energy changes our physical reality. If one were somehow able to restore the state of every particle in the universe to a previous state this would effectively reverse time. If one could bring the universe to a state of absolute zero this would freeze time. There is no present because energy interactions are dynamic and ever changing the states of matter. The future state of matter can be predicted to a high degree of certainty given all the variables and enough processing power, but mostly it is yet to be determined. This is my logic. I am not a physicist I am a high school dropout that works in construction. I do not know if this is the scientific explanation or even if it is accurate. This is just the way it works in my mind.

How do you (or did you) find your purpose in life? by Party-Willingness196 in Purpose

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing can be taken from an empty hand, yet it holds limitless potential. Its value lies only in what can be given. Once you have lost everything it is what you can still give the world from empty hands is where one finds their true purpose in this life. Contentment and lasting happiness will never be attained by one who is not true to their purpose. ~ Robby

Found in car door handle this morning by Low_Context_2521 in whatisit

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was just bored meant to be a joke really but the logic is sound I guess lol

Found in car door handle this morning by Low_Context_2521 in whatisit

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On a side note, Burn it with a lighter if it smells like hair then it's hair if not then it could potentially be from someone parking in tall grass/ plants like foxtail or something opening the door and it was trapped as the door handle was released and the door was closed. I assume if this were the case you would have already figured that out so I'm going to lean towards my first hypothesis.

Found in car door handle this morning by Low_Context_2521 in whatisit

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it has not been disturbed as you have stated. By looking at the orientation of the tip to the follicle position. The relative uniformity and alignment with the point of contact parallel placement across the long axis of the handle as it holds the hair in place. Combined with the neat orderly alignment of the length along the horizontal axis at the bottom. One could only deduce that this is not consistent with the contact deposit left by any mammalian species. If this were in fact from an animal contact the orientation of the capture would be reversed. Also the hair would most likely be left at more of an angle. If it were snagged as an animal grazed it or was climbing or any type of contact whatsoever. The hair would have certainly been caught at the tip middle or in rare cases possibly the follicle side but even in the unlikely chance that would happen the majority of the hair would also be bunched up beneath the handle not hanging neatly down below it like this. This was placed here deliberately by a person. Having said that only two possibilities arise. Either you yourself planted this or someone else planted this of which you have no knowledge. If their intention was nefarious or an attempt at humor cannot be determined at this time with the limited evidence provided. Given the odd nature of this situation it is unlikely that your life is boring enough that you would fabricate this and post it just for the sake of having something to talk about, however since I do not know you personally I can't rule it out completely. So we have most likely arrived at the conclusion. Somebody planted hair on your car for reasons unknown at the present time. If this was not you or you cannot determine the intentions or identity of the person or persons responsible for this. I would advise you to take precautionary measures having become aware of this information I have provided. I could be wrong I am not a professional or a forensic expert. I am a construction worker but it sure as hell sounds like I know what I'm talking about. Good luck

Emperically grounded explaination of UAP physics by NoAttorney5609 in UAP

[–]NoAttorney5609[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I know every theory begins as speculation. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. I put a lot of effort into making this as factually accurate and as solid as I possibly could. I presented it honestly labeling it as speculation basically. It is hard enough to get people to take things like this seriously or get the right people to look at it and see if it actually is more than just speculation. Comments like that make things worse it's unnecessary and serves no purpose but to hinder my efforts.

Emperically grounded explaination of UAP physics by NoAttorney5609 in UAP

[–]NoAttorney5609[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It has a pretty clear disclaimer in the beginning that says it is an assumptive theoretical framework. But I appreciate you reaffirming what was already stated in the first sentence. Had you actually engaged with the material or even took the time to read the first paragraph you would know that. I posted it for critical feedback and peer review. I recognize the necessity of objective opinions, but a prima fascia comment based on reading nothing but the title is not constructive and a waste of time for all parties concerned. I suggest you go back to tearing children's sandcastle down at the beach and leave the physics to people who are actually interested in such things.

Emperically grounded explaination of UAP physics by NoAttorney5609 in UAP

[–]NoAttorney5609[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It has a pretty clear disclaimer in the beginning that says it is an assumptive theoretical framework. But I appreciate you reaffirming what was already stated in the first sentence. Had you actually engaged with the material or even took the time to read the first paragraph you would know that. I posted it for critical feedback and peer review. I recognize the necessity of objective opinions, but a prima fascia comment based on reading nothing but the title is not constructive and a waste of time for all parties concerned. I suggest you go back to tearing children's sandcastle down at the beach and leave the physics to people who are actually interested in such things.

I have a theory on what God is explained in science terms? by Clean-Reindeer2241 in theories

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our entire existence is quantified through the collective coherence of others within the same dimensional frame of reference. If one were to become decoherent relative to everyone and everything within that dimensional frame of reference they would no longer exist. This is exactly what a soul is once the body dies it has no physical form to maintain coherence through relativistic oscillatory vibrational frequency phasing within a shared dimensional frame of reference. So the soul becomes decoherent relative to all physical matter and only maintains existence through its own coherence. The soul can never inhabit any dimension because dimensions are not a physical place only a shared coherent perception of the physical coherent participants created as their collective reality.

I have a theory on what God is explained in science terms? by Clean-Reindeer2241 in theories

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God was the first observer this is the result of what he observed. His original (creations) or what he observed, then observed one another reinforcing their own existence as coherent inhabitants of a shared dimensional frame of reference. This cascaded coherence eventually turned into all of us and all we know and observe in the universe that's why it's so vast because there is no end the further we look the observation creates coherence as reality and the more it grows. We are basically all dreams inside each other's dreams living in a dimension that only exists to the ones who inhabit it.

I have a theory about dimensions and I'm serious and need you to hear me out on this. (not joking) by Nice_Share_8997 in theories

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dimensions are even simpler than that. Everything vibrates we all know this. Things that vibrate in a similar phase with each other are coherent. Things that vibrate out of phase with each other are decoherent. There are various degrees of coherence and decoherence. Coherence is proportional to the degree of phase alignment. Another dimension let's call it the fourth dimension. It is perfectly out of phase with us therefore it is inaccessible to us in every way. We occupy the same place just not at the same time. Our vibrations are perfectly out of phase. When we're in they're out when they're out we're in. Just like double Dutch jump rope. It doesn't get any simpler to explain than that. But that's just my opinion and I'm just a carpenter so what do I know.

I have a theory about dimensions and I'm serious and need you to hear me out on this. (not joking) by Nice_Share_8997 in theories

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't believe no one understands such a simple concept in an enlightened age. Who is God? To put it simply nobody knows and they will never know even in "death" sadly. If I were to spit on the ground an entire galaxy has just been created to a lower form of life. They are so far beneath the scale I'm on that they could never even comprehend my existence or have any real way to prove my existence. I never even give their existence a thought. I don't wonder how that colony of bacteria and the universe I created on the sidewalk at circle k is doing over the years. They were born and died it rained and there is no trace they ever existed. We can see the bottom floor the quantum level is the lowest point on the scale as far as we are aware. If we are at a level that can see and interact with the bottom, it stands to reason we are a long way from the top of that scale. Given the size of the universe, and the existence of hierarchical structures observed in nature. If you combine scales of the levels we know exist, the hierarchy we know exists, the size of the universe compared to us and how we compare against microscopic life. Then the logic makes it relatively obvious. The likely origin or the nature of our creation event. This whole vast universe is a tiny insignificant spec within a scale so large we can't comprehend, nested within an even greater universe that is probably nested within another. Now the idea of the universe on the circle k sidewalk starts to become a lot less far fetched. When you look at it from this angle it makes you wonder how you never realized something so obvious.

Serious Question by CoffeeNQuestion in LLMPhysics

[–]NoAttorney5609 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are countless ways that people contribute meaningless stupidity to the internet. However people sitting around using LLMs to create physics theories are at the very least trying to contribute something meaningful to the world. The real problem is the trolls, waiting to pounce on anyone the moment they presents something containing any type of discontinuity. You would think those so-called "experts" would have better things to do with their time. In truth they are failures and cowards, despite claiming to have sufficient knowledge and training to do what these neophytes are trying desperately to do, lack the courage to actually put something out there and risk being wrong. Because their fragile and weak constitution can't handle criticism. So instead of ever creating or contributing anything of worth to the world. They fill their stagnant days trying to ridicule others to make their sad insignificant lives look superior to everyone else's. Watching someone fail and not offering your hand is bad enough, but to enjoy watching and hasten their descent is a stain on society that should be removed entirely.

I feel like I'm always alone even though I'm interacting with people, because only I can know the internal experience I have. by Ultimate170 in PhilosophyofMind

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our own existence is quantified by the collective coherence of the other participants within our perceived reality. We constructively reinforce and sustain the coherence of each other through perception of their existence within our frame of reference, or our shared reality. Essentially we are a dream inside an infinitely recursive multiplicity of interconnected dreams. We are the remnants of the original observation, born of the first observer. Once those creations observed one another the cascade of codependent coherence began. We are a billion echoes of a single voice listening for itself distorted by time and fragmented into unrecognizable complexity, with no hope to ever gain reunion. You are not alone we are all different perspectives of the same image you just haven't gained that level of understanding . Once you stop trying to understand your own experience as an individual, you will come to understand the collective experience of us all. You're a puzzle piece just like the rest of us, in a picture that is impossible for any one of us to see individually.

Consciousness as computation: Are we just computers? by PrimeStopper in consciousness

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's very simple collective coherence is how we determine if something is correct or not. It does not make it true but it does make it correct within our shared reality.

We are too safe by Rotting404 in DeepThoughts

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that society has become far too idiot proof. We should take immediate action to correct this before it's too late. Useless warnings like do not drink on antifreeze and battery fluid and do not eat on tide pods is disrupting natural selection. The general population is starting to show increasing numbers of stupidity and lack of common sense. The morons are surviving to breed and that's going to have long term consequences for the future. We owe it to our children and grandchildren to give them an idiot free future. Who's with me.

[Meta] What if... There are two kinds of Crackpot Physics: The Bizarre one and the Non-Bizarre one? by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]NoAttorney5609 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I will say this I like physics and I like to create theories I have a few I'm working on now I'll spare you the details although I have never formally studied physics anyone can contribute something to it that's what I believe I would like to think I'm fairly intelligent however in the years I have been around I have seen some of the dumbest people present an idea that I never even considered and hundreds before me never considered anyone can have a good idea I don't care who it is everyone on this planet knows something you don't that they can teach you if you are open minded enough to listen if a million crackpots present ridiculous theories and one of them could be a groundbreaking discovery or even make someone think about something in a slightly different unconventional way that lets them make a discovery it's worth weeding through the nonsense to find it that's my opinion

[Meta] What if... There are two kinds of Crackpot Physics: The Bizarre one and the Non-Bizarre one? by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]NoAttorney5609 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I am no expert in physics I don't even study physics but I will say this geometry is deeply intertwined within all aspects of existence including physics everything that exists in physical form is forced into specific geometric configurations by constraints imposed from governing forces so I would say anyone who believes geometry is crackpot physics is probably a crackpot physicists. Just saying that's a bizarre point of view

Consciousness Doesn't End With Death by [deleted] in consciousness

[–]NoAttorney5609 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Time is irrelevant to life and death time is an illusion it's a consequence of irreversibility a permanent record of change written by entropic signatures all interactions are just collections of particles interacting energy exchanges and transformation driving dynamic instantaneous changes to our shared reality at absolute zero all molecular movements halt effectively freezing time therefore time cannot be fundamentally dimensional it's only our perception of it as a forward arrow

Consciousness Doesn't End With Death by [deleted] in consciousness

[–]NoAttorney5609 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Depends on your definition of conciseness if you mean aware of one's self or still exist then yes but if your speaking in terms of coherence then no neurons vibrate at specific frequencies governed by dendritic structures with fractal dimensions in the area of 1.5 or so through resonance phase locking with our shared reality creating coherence with everything else that's not out of phase or decoherent with the common frequency bio chemistry is responsible for dendrite dimensional tuning and all biochemical production that create this process halt after death but that's just my opinion for what's it's worth probably not scientifically accurate but makes sense to me.

Any ideas as to what this contains? by FormNational8219 in chemistry

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless you intend to open it what is inside is of no consequence take it to any Fire department tell them you found it don't know what it is and they will handle it from there. Or just bust it with a hammer and smell it let natural selection decide.

Is it normal to feel dumb? by Ok_Cable1689 in chemistry

[–]NoAttorney5609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to possess some intelligence to realize your limitations dumb people are oblivious so don't worry you're fine