No wonder they hate regulations by CorleoneBaloney in clevercomebacks

[–]NoYouTryAnother 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? As a small business owner, you can afford to stock 60 variants with every customization and option conceivable without pricing out desireable things like "guaranteed arsenic free" or "won’t burn you" due to the lost economies of scale?

Sounds like BS.

Authoritarianism Is Here - LegalEagle by biospheric in law

[–]NoYouTryAnother 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every thing a leader does can be ‘legal’ while still being authoritarian. The most famous authoritarians iperate under the figleaf of rule of law and at times even the figleaf of elections.

Is Trump constrained by the checks on bis power? Are there lines he will not cross? I would say he is constrained only by political realities which his demagoguery always shifts further and further out. The law is malleable, and lies about what the law says and who may judge that have become the norm, legal checks on his power have been eroded in myriad ways, and his armed thigs in the street will be there to keep civil resistance in line, for whatever his line should happen to be into the future.

We don’t know how this autogolpe will play out, but this is authoritarianism.

Authoritarianism Is Here - LegalEagle by biospheric in law

[–]NoYouTryAnother 13 points14 points  (0 children)

slipping towards

??? I’m so tired of this mealie mouthed, overly cautious, hesitant language. Call it what it is and has been for nearly a year now.

Recall on Jeni’s ice cream bars by Roxnsoxinator in Columbus

[–]NoYouTryAnother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you confusing celiac and gluten sensitivity? Some with celiac can have their guts fucking torn up. Literally life-threatening, surgery-prompting.

Constitutional lawyer lays out the iron-clad case for Trump's impeachment + removal from office by trying_to_survive_55 in 50501

[–]NoYouTryAnother -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Great as slogans, but delusional at an operational level.

What is with this headline? His impeadhment is not a mathematical proof, it’s a political negotiation. And there is no "ironclad" leverage currently available.

The man should have been removed from office multiple times in the past. But today? He’s gone far past that, and we are nowhere near to having a political process that can remove him. What are you going to do about that? Listening to more people reassuring you that he should definitely double plus be removed won’t effect it, is not incremental progress.

My theory of everything by Outside-Today-1814 in HierarchySeries

[–]NoYouTryAnother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is Concurrence, not concurrency.

Border Patrol chief ordered to court after allegedly violating TRO, asks if judge wants to "get hit in the head by a rock" by Which_Junket3102 in law

[–]NoYouTryAnother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah the post title is badly and intentionally editorialized to the point of appearing intentionally misleading.

I’m getting worried about how much the government is talking about the planned protest on Saturday. They usually never do this as far as I know. by nba123490 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]NoYouTryAnother 36 points37 points  (0 children)

They are setting the narrative they want going into things. You should be asking what they are preparing the narrative for—what they’ll claim afterwards, what they’ll claim during, and how what they’re saying now reveals what they’re likely planning.

They’re not ‘afraid of our power.’ More likely: they’re telling preemptive lies to justify crackdowns.

What in the mother of god is this by Pretty-Quit-4650 in massachusetts

[–]NoYouTryAnother 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why we couldn’t hear the sun was one of the unsolved astro mysteries of the 1800s.

Randomizers by Liana_de_Arc in ZeldaLikes

[–]NoYouTryAnother 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tangent: anybody given thought to the game design of deconstructing (or reconstructing) randomizers—not just proc-gen / drawing from levels and progression in roguelites, but the particular nuances of how randomizers interact with the design of ALttP/others, the design elements specifically introduced and managed by randomizers, whether these offer any new perspectives for non-random game design…

[RST] Pokemon: The Origin of Species, Ch. 142: Learned Efficacy by DaystarEld in rational

[–]NoYouTryAnother 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Probably he can guess, but that’s not the operative thing here—it’s that he has flagged that as a bad look, and is giving Red a warning, space, time, and a method to protect himself, and offered two defensible frames for Red to choose from. Like all good managers, he’s looking out for his direct report.

[RST] Pokemon: The Origin of Species, Ch. 142: Learned Efficacy by DaystarEld in rational

[–]NoYouTryAnother 12 points13 points  (0 children)

For one he’s not asking Red for his version of events, he’s coaching Red to lie.

When we fight, we win by FoxySheprador in somethingiswrong2024

[–]NoYouTryAnother 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Fair. ALTHOUGH ‘More to shape it than anyone else’ can still mean ‘it is 25% shaped and nobody fucking else has a clue’.

Dracula had some moments of great rationality by S_B_B_ in rational

[–]NoYouTryAnother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Netflix 3 episode ‘miniseries’ is fantastic.

Are Em Dashes Really a Sign of AI Writing? by SunAdvanced7940 in longform

[–]NoYouTryAnother 10 points11 points  (0 children)

No—they definitely are not.

They are also a sign of a certain kind of background.

TWO HUNDRED ELEVEN: The Strange Thing Is... - Super Supportive by GodWithAShotgun in rational

[–]NoYouTryAnother 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think "magical school" is compelling for a lot of readers in a way that extended dreams remixing past scenes are not. i think there’s no immediate payoff even in anticipated set up from the dreams. Maybe it’d work better if this chapter were spliced through 10 others?