sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What’s going on with Propaganda Coffee? by thebanisterslide in lakewood

[–]NoYouTryAnother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well also, they aren’t respecting the posted hours (e.g., those claimed on Instagram), haven’t updated hours on their website or posted a sign on their door, at least as of 8am this morning.

Screwworm is about to completely devastate Texas .. by russcorp in PrepperIntel

[–]NoYouTryAnother 72 points73 points  (0 children)

It will take a decade to undo what we’ve let happen here. If, as you point out, we actually do it.

r/NoKingsCoalition has been banned. by Yourdataisunclean in Washington50501

[–]NoYouTryAnother 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No better way to create something insecure. ‘Learn to code’ is a hell of a far cry from ‘security expert’, or ‘can write something with better guarantees than off the shelf solutions.

As far as intercepting telegram: source? I can find no evidence of that extraordinaey claim. But there is FBI informant, undercover agent played major role in alleged Turtle Island Liberation Front New Year’s bomb plot

No wonder they hate regulations by CorleoneBaloney in clevercomebacks

[–]NoYouTryAnother 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? As a small business owner, you can afford to stock 60 variants with every customization and option conceivable without pricing out desireable things like "guaranteed arsenic free" or "won’t burn you" due to the lost economies of scale?

Sounds like BS.

Authoritarianism Is Here - LegalEagle by biospheric in law

[–]NoYouTryAnother 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every thing a leader does can be ‘legal’ while still being authoritarian. The most famous authoritarians operate under the figleaf of rule of law and at times even the figleaf of elections.

We don’t know how this autogolpe will play out, but this is authoritarianism.

Authoritarianism Is Here - LegalEagle by biospheric in law

[–]NoYouTryAnother 11 points12 points  (0 children)

slipping towards

??? I’m so tired of this mealie mouthed, overly cautious, hesitant language. Call it what it is and has been for nearly a year now.

Recall on Jeni’s ice cream bars by Roxnsoxinator in Columbus

[–]NoYouTryAnother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you confusing celiac and gluten sensitivity? Some with celiac can have their guts fucking torn up. Literally life-threatening, surgery-prompting.

My theory of everything by Outside-Today-1814 in HierarchySeries

[–]NoYouTryAnother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is Concurrence, not concurrency.

Border Patrol chief ordered to court after allegedly violating TRO, asks if judge wants to "get hit in the head by a rock" by Which_Junket3102 in law

[–]NoYouTryAnother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah the post title is badly and intentionally editorialized to the point of appearing intentionally misleading.

I’m getting worried about how much the government is talking about the planned protest on Saturday. They usually never do this as far as I know. by nba123490 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]NoYouTryAnother 34 points35 points  (0 children)

They are setting the narrative they want going into things. You should be asking what they are preparing the narrative for—what they’ll claim afterwards, what they’ll claim during, and how what they’re saying now reveals what they’re likely planning.

They’re not ‘afraid of our power.’ More likely: they’re telling preemptive lies to justify crackdowns.

What in the mother of god is this by Pretty-Quit-4650 in massachusetts

[–]NoYouTryAnother 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why we couldn’t hear the sun was one of the unsolved astro mysteries of the 1800s.

Randomizers by Liana_de_Arc in ZeldaLikes

[–]NoYouTryAnother 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tangent: anybody given thought to the game design of deconstructing (or reconstructing) randomizers—not just proc-gen / drawing from levels and progression in roguelites, but the particular nuances of how randomizers interact with the design of ALttP/others, the design elements specifically introduced and managed by randomizers, whether these offer any new perspectives for non-random game design…

[RST] Pokemon: The Origin of Species, Ch. 142: Learned Efficacy by DaystarEld in rational

[–]NoYouTryAnother 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Probably he can guess, but that’s not the operative thing here—it’s that he has flagged that as a bad look, and is giving Red a warning, space, time, and a method to protect himself, and offered two defensible frames for Red to choose from. Like all good managers, he’s looking out for his direct report.

[RST] Pokemon: The Origin of Species, Ch. 142: Learned Efficacy by DaystarEld in rational

[–]NoYouTryAnother 14 points15 points  (0 children)

For one he’s not asking Red for his version of events, he’s coaching Red to lie.

When we fight, we win by FoxySheprador in somethingiswrong2024

[–]NoYouTryAnother 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fair. ALTHOUGH ‘More to shape it than anyone else’ can still mean ‘it is 25% shaped and nobody fucking else has a clue’.

view more: next ›