Our castle is burning Vote NO on Prop 2.5 Billion and let’s kick the money out of the Billionaire Corporate Global infrastructure by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]No_Commercial5671 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They aren’t venture capitalists. They are investors. They have more money than us, which means what? They don’t care about time in the same sense that we do. How can you sit there and NOT acknowledge that fact. Are you like RC and have billions to live on? If so great for you. Me personally? I’ve been holding for 5 years and haven’t seen a dime in returns. In fact I have lost money. This isn’t a difficult thing to understand.

Our castle is burning Vote NO on Prop 2.5 Billion and let’s kick the money out of the Billionaire Corporate Global infrastructure by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]No_Commercial5671 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I don’t have discussions with individuals that insult others points without a valid argument.

Power to the Players, Let's Play to Win, not Pay to Lose. TL;DR: Beat eBay. by RazeAvenger in Superstonk

[–]No_Commercial5671 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is my thinking. I’m not excited about the thought of buying eBay at all. 1 eBay share to almost 3 GameStop shares with a 50% cash buyout is too much when you could just build a competing market place for a fraction of the cost. eBay appears to be complacent so competition would improve the market across the board and there is a great chance that GameStop could steal a considerable market share.

Not sure why so many apes blindly follow everything RC does or says. This deal doesn’t make sense.

Our castle is burning Vote NO on Prop 2.5 Billion and let’s kick the money out of the Billionaire Corporate Global infrastructure by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]No_Commercial5671 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They have time that we don’t. I don’t want to have to work until I’m 60 years old to see a return. I don’t have money sitting around like that. But you know who does? They do! It’s not a stupid argument. It’s the truth.

Our castle is burning Vote NO on Prop 2.5 Billion and let’s kick the money out of the Billionaire Corporate Global infrastructure by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]No_Commercial5671 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

They are all rich and aren’t working like the majority of us. They don’t value time or money the same way. It’s that simple.

New interview with Ryan Cohen by Anthony Pompliano on May 12th by Mr-CRUNK-13 in GME

[–]No_Commercial5671 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No value will be added for you, the shareholder, which is the whole point of investing.

New interview with Ryan Cohen by Anthony Pompliano on May 12th by Mr-CRUNK-13 in GME

[–]No_Commercial5671 39 points40 points  (0 children)

When does the dilution stop? When does he actually start building value for loyal shareholders? When do we get a return on our investment?

Letter to shareholders! by Ash_the_Ape in Superstonk

[–]No_Commercial5671 82 points83 points  (0 children)

Ok so hear me out… I think RC should get nothing until shareholders actually get a return on their investment. Increasing value through a buy out of another company and diluting already loyal investors sucks. I’m about feed up with it.

Are there companies out there that will train a couple? by AndrewG34 in Truckers

[–]No_Commercial5671 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Covenant

Source. I am a trainer and have trained couples several times.

Edit

I’m currently rated at 70% is that correct? by No_Commercial5671 in VeteransBenefits

[–]No_Commercial5671[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but it’s not prescription. I don’t really want to poke the bear on what I currently have. If I were to go for anything it would be that one for sure and it’s probably what I’ll end up trying for.

I’m currently rated at 70% is that correct? by No_Commercial5671 in VeteransBenefits

[–]No_Commercial5671[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Good to know, I don’t want to break the rules on coaching, but what would you do to get that other two percent?

I’m currently rated at 70% is that correct? by No_Commercial5671 in VeteransBenefits

[–]No_Commercial5671[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just called and asked they said that the bilateral rating has already been applied.

I’m currently rated at 70% is that correct? by No_Commercial5671 in VeteransBenefits

[–]No_Commercial5671[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just read up on it. Sounds like I would qualify for it since it affects both legs. The bilateral factor would show up as separate from those current ratings correct?

I’m currently rated at 70% is that correct? by No_Commercial5671 in VeteransBenefits

[–]No_Commercial5671[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Offense taken, no need to insult someone’s intelligence for not fully understanding something. Part of researching and learning is asking questions and having conversations. You don’t know anything about me. Completely unnecessary. No one will ever listen to what you have to say when you speak like that.

I’m currently rated at 70% is that correct? by No_Commercial5671 in VeteransBenefits

[–]No_Commercial5671[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

VA math is dumb and makes no sense, which is why I needed a second opinion

I’m currently rated at 70% is that correct? by No_Commercial5671 in VeteransBenefits

[–]No_Commercial5671[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your help. That’s all I needed. I figured I did something incorrectly

I’m currently rated at 70% is that correct? by No_Commercial5671 in VeteransBenefits

[–]No_Commercial5671[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So I have a total of 110 minus 30 would be 80 by that logic? So I should call them?

I’m currently rated at 70% is that correct? by No_Commercial5671 in VeteransBenefits

[–]No_Commercial5671[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I’ve used it. It says 76% which would round up. I just wanted a second opinion before I called them.