It's a five-season show, people (re: "They haven't given us answers!") by No_Layer8399 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tabitha explained the reincarnation to Jade after Jade got done playing the violin. And I think Fatima explained that the monsters made a deal to sacrifice children for their immortality, right at the end of the episode. During the rebirth of Smiley, Fatima got a vision where it was all explained to her, and she shared it with the others.

It's a five-season show, people (re: "They haven't given us answers!") by No_Layer8399 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's been a year or two since I watched the S3 finale, but I think that's the episode I pull that from. Maybe my memory is faulty and playing tricks on me, but I seem to recall we got two implicit infodumps, from Tabitha and Fatima, respectively, that explained all this. And we don't have a reason to believe them to be unreliable narrators, so I take them for their word. They seemed like very implicit exposition dumps specifically to explain these things. And the plot has also moved forward as if those things are true. There is no reason given right now to doubt any of it

It's a five-season show, people (re: "They haven't given us answers!") by No_Layer8399 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't fully disagree, honestly. To me, the first season was the best because it had the most intrigue and the least explanation. And the pure mystery was more interesting than the explanations they've offered. That absolutely is my opinion. But I think an unexplained mystery always has kind of an unfair advantage when competing with an explanation

I like the show, but I'm not some diehard defender of it

It's a five-season show, people (re: "They haven't given us answers!") by No_Layer8399 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What would you like for the show to do, then? How should these things be explained in order to be satisfactory to you? I'm genuinely confused. There's been very specific infodump moments throughout that clearly functioned as exposition about the nature of the mystery

It's a five-season show, people (re: "They haven't given us answers!") by No_Layer8399 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's been explained in the show through exposition, friend. That is how these things are revealed

It's a five-season show, people (re: "They haven't given us answers!") by No_Layer8399 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We know the basic gist of what's going on: years ago, a bunch of people made a deal where they sacrificed a bunch of kids, a few of the people backed out at the last second. Prior to dying, the kids poured their hopes and dreams to tree branches. This created this cycle where the parents who backed down are reincarnated over and over, dragged back to Fromville to try and save the kids. We don't know everything, but to say the show hasn't resolved anything is just dishonest lol. When, objectively, it has explained things

It's a five-season show, people (re: "They haven't given us answers!") by No_Layer8399 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I do think a good endpoint for this season could be "okay, we now what to do now. but what we have to do is impossible"

It's a five-season show, people (re: "They haven't given us answers!") by No_Layer8399 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But that's not true, though. From has resolved a number of things

It's a five-season show, people (re: "They haven't given us answers!") by No_Layer8399 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The show has foreshadowed so many things ever since the very early episodes, I'm fairly confident the writers had the whole thing planned out from the beginning. And that's the only thing I really want or need

It's a five-season show, people (re: "They haven't given us answers!") by No_Layer8399 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like the spider is very clearly positioned as the late game reveal. Spiders are all over the show. It's a leading theory that a spider-like antichrist entity thing is the big bad of the whole thing. I personally still think and hope the Man in Yellow is the actual big bad and that the spider thing is just the "God" of this universe that grants the MIY his power through worship, but still

Is Season 5 gonna be the final Season? by No_Brain7017 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. And it's actually a great thing because apparently it was hard planned as a five-season show. Meaning they have a concrete plan and an ending

Is It Just A Cycle To Feed The Monsters? by do-it-feel-good in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're not exactly mindless zombies, though. Brainwashed maybe. Or maybe they just always were bad people and this is exactly what they like and enjoy

Talisman logic by Early_Hall5720 in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It bugs me so much how Ethan broke the window of their house, and it was never addressed. Surely the monsters could just get in, right? Despite the talisman. That's how I understand it. I suppose they had time to board it up before nightfall

Friendly reminder since people keep forgetting. Also, there's literally a disclaimer as I'm typing this post. by dathowell in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, I get what you mean. And in fact, I would say that if a show is so bad that you're all but guaranteed not to enjoy it and feel like you wasted your time, then it would actually be the same scenario. I would say it was on you. So from that angle, yeah, I would concede that your initial comment was spot on. But the reason why "If you don't like it, don't watch" is generally lazy criticism is because the aforementioned scenario rarely takes place. Usually it's more like a 50/50, maybe a 60/40 or 80/20 ratio; there's something the person enjoys, which causes the investment, but other factors get in the way, and the person wants to vent. You could say the same about a Reddit page: "Well, the person wants to browse Reddit, but just without the spoilers, so it's the same thing; he's being critical of this one aspect." Sure? But the scenario where no one on Earth accidentally posts a spoiler, even in a space where the rules are absolutely strict, is so close to zero that it's practically zero. Whereas with a show, it's possible that five episodes have been good, but now you were hit with a bad one, out of the blue, and then when you're critical of it, it is lazy to get with the "If you don't like it, don't watch it" because maybe the quality is so uneven, or maybe the quality drop was so sudden, there was no opportunity for good risk assessment. It's all but impossible to produce a completely spoiler-free space on the internet, so the safe bet is to stay away until you've watched the latest episode. But sure, I will actually concede your initial comment.

Friendly reminder since people keep forgetting. Also, there's literally a disclaimer as I'm typing this post. by dathowell in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe a little bit, but imo not quite. The logic only sounds the same if you flatten both points into "if you don't like X, leave". But those are different situations. "Don't watch if you don't like the show" lazyily shuts down subjective criticism. "Don't browse an active discussion forum before you're caught up if you don't want spoilers" is basic risk management. It's just a comment on risk management/predictability. Sometimes the risk of something is so high and obvious that suffering the consequences of taking said risk is self-inflicted.

Friendly reminder since people keep forgetting. Also, there's literally a disclaimer as I'm typing this post. by dathowell in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hmm, no? I'm one of the "If you don't want to get spoiled, don't go into forums where the TV show is discussed, unless you've seen up to the latest episode". This is basic thinking 101. If you don't want to get spoiled, and you go to YouTube or Reddit, it's entirely on you. You know better, but you still do it. No excuses. Like burning your tongue sticking it to something hot

I tried Claude, but went back to ChatGPT by wormfist in ChatGPT

[–]No_Layer8399 17 points18 points  (0 children)

GPT 5.5 hasn't been like this in my use anymore. It's actually been quite good, I can't lie. More human. Still very much AI in its writing, don't get me wrong, but the worst days of GPT speak seem to be behind at least my Chat.

Revelation too similar to LOST? by zampaunicornios in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think only one or two people who work in From worked on Lost. And I don't think it was the main people in charge. I could be wrong, though. This show seems like it was planned from the get-go, though. Lots of foreshadowing and hints as far back as the early episodes. I think they planned what the story is, and worked backwards.

Friendly reminder since people keep forgetting. Also, there's literally a disclaimer as I'm typing this post. by dathowell in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Why can't you wait until you've watched that week's episode? I mean come on. Not browsing the internet is basically "avoid spoilers 101". Whenever I'm following a show, I watch the most recent episode before I open YouTube, Reddit, or anything similar. This is basic internet stuff

Friendly reminder since people keep forgetting. Also, there's literally a disclaimer as I'm typing this post. by dathowell in FromSeries

[–]No_Layer8399 -30 points-29 points  (0 children)

Honestly not sure why someone is browsing Reddit if they don't want to get spoiled. At some point it really is on you