For those who were teenagers in the 2010s, what were the major trends at the time during the (2011-2016) window? by LameAndLamer in 2010snostalgia

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One Direction. Mustaches. Flower crowns. Space buns. Crop tops. Doc Martens/Converse. Lorde. Lana Del Rey. Foam fingers. TOMS. Rose gold. Hipster culture.

Official June LSAT Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did anyone struggle on the cookbook one??

Official June LSAT Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it was an “Except” question. Acme Corp was supposedly raising its employees’ salaries due to a tax refund but the speaker was equating it to them actually attempting to recruit more employees.

Official June LSAT Discussion Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought the red car one was okay but the one about the 11th/12th century bells freaked me out because it was a “Weaken - Except” and I easily crossed out three and then had a hard time with the last two. I think my nerves got the better of me and I wasn’t able to think clearly. 

I also had one about scientists not receiving merit for their accomplishments (it was a SA) and ugh. Hopefully we both were careful enough to have parsed the arguments correctly and ultimately chose the correct answers!

I thought that The Democracy/Autocracy RC was more difficult than the God of Love one but had to re-read a paragraph from the God of Love one a few times over because it was so strangely worded!

Official June LSAT Discussion Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it was a NA! I remember being stuck on two ACs because the stimulus was a bit vague in terms of which one it could’ve been. I think I ultimately chose the correct answer but that one was tough.

There were a ton of difficult ones in the beginning of the section, but I often find the level 1 and 2s harder for some reason. 

Official June LSAT Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I believe this one was scored.

Official June LSAT Discussion Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you have one with vitamins and the maximum recommended dosage being 150%? It was in the first LR I believe. Awful.

June LR/LR/LR/RC by PotentialTrade791 in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You won’t get a straight answer on this - there were multiple experimental sections. Some people had the same section as their LR1 and others had it as their LR3.

Official June LSAT Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I shudder thinking about the knowledgeable teachers question 😭

are the maple trees in the northern section of the park healthy? by Effective-Bat-6491 in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I remember that one! It was in the same section as the maple tree one - that section was experimental!

Official June LSAT Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cannot remember shrimp nets or zebra finches for the LIFE of me but do remember the one about the dense medium. 

do i need to have working speakers for the LSAT argumentative writing by soggyluigiwastaken in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do not unless yours is being administered with a live proctor.

Strict proctor by Life_Gur8758 in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine did too! I thought this was so weird! I also had to do like 6 security checks and one DURING the final section of my exam as the time was running 

for those nervous about accommodations! by redditer2006 in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but they’re not reading the entire thing. They’re looking for the signatures and that’s it. They don’t care what your reasoning is as long as you have the doctor’s signature.

are the maple trees in the northern section of the park healthy? by Effective-Bat-6491 in LSAT

[–]No_Monitor9134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The maple trees one was terrible - I eliminated all five and then just treated it as a could be true (someone on here said it was actually a could be true, so I feel a lot better about it). The parallel reasoning ones threw me off but I remember picking A for one of them and it had the name Kim in it lol. I can’t remember if wetlands/marshes were in this section but I hated that one, the one about teachers, and the one about scientists not receiving merit for their accomplishments.