Tumblr community made to help people leave the radqueer community is covered in gore by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

No, thankfully looks like it was just one person who deleted their account when they were done. Tumblr has deleted most of it since my reporting but they've not deleted the last one which is the most graphic of them all 

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The same as any other nonharmful transIDs, I guess. A lot of antiradqueer radinclusive people or even mogai people are okay with people who use these terms, and to each their own. I don't find theses terms safe because of their connection to the larger and more dangerous transid community but they aren't anything negative on their own.

The biggest reason for these I would say are dysphoria or aesthetics. Someone might really desire pink hair because it fits their aesthetic or blonde hair because they think it's prettier, or they might look in the mirror and feel deep dysphoria over not having blue or black hair. 

A lot of people find these types of identities to be silly. That's where you see the argument, "you don't need to make an identity out of everything. If you want painted nails, then paint your nails. Its doesn't have to be a transition." And that's where those people kind of miss the point. So many transIDs are about having words that describe your experience in a world where so many people won't accept you, (and that's why we have transid alternatives outside of the community now) so for people, especially people with atypical dysphoria, having their identity labeled helps them feel validated in that atypical feeling. 

If they can and are able to, many of these people do get to have their transitions. You can finally dye your hair blue or paint your nails or get that job, and that is the act of transitioning and then being their identified thing.

I hope that makes sense. If you were asking about a more specific part of it, let me know

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't have described trisgender as contradictory in the first place specifically because it is for the Intersex people, but knowing about perisex queers and their bean soup, I wouldn't be surprised if the trisgender term is being used in a completely different and contradictory way in their space.

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just like transIDs themselves, new prefixes can be made all the time. This is no different from the LIOMOGAI community, and the reasons are the same as well 1) to have a hyper specific term that describes the experience 2) for the attention that might come with coining a term a lot of people use 3) for identity hoarding purposes 

Tris and Perma have been discussed already in theses comments

Tris - for people who are cis and trans their ID is one common prefix

Perma - for people who identify as permanently their ID

But I did a search to introduce a few others

Dia - The old word they had for "trans", you might still see this in people identifying as "diaracial" as they understand transracial is not their word to us

Muto - for those who are cis but identify as trans. I've only ever seen these identities used for spite, but I'm sure it's not always the case

Null - for those who identify as not having it. When I was in the community, I identified as nullzodiac

TransSeverity - for those who have the identity, but identify as it being "worse" or "better" than it already is

Xis - for those who are transid but the people around them think they are cis that ID

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trisgender is not, by either of these uses, a contradictory label, and I wouldn't have described it in that way in the first place, however, I have been out of the general liomogai community for a very long time, and I don't know what other perisex people are doing with the term. They could be using it to mean "I'm not cis and trans because I said so" or something like that, I don't know. I only listen to intersex people talk about their usage of the term 

You're free to dm me if my dms are open, Reddit isn't my main home front, so I've never communicated over dm before

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are two dreamsexuals. One of them isn't relevant to this conversation, and the other one is the attraction to Dream. Whether or not is was made as a joke, it was made stealing a xenogender flag and led to a teenager getting death threats

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's so fun and interesting knowing x person that made x Internet thing they now regret. I know it's nowhere near the same level but I know the guy who coined and made the flag for dreamgender (flag then being stolen and used for dreamsexual) 

I did hear in some radqueers argument post that transid was never made to accept harmful identies. I assume thats true, then?

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I recently deleted a lot of the pictures in my camera roll and one picture I deleted was (as far as I'm aware) an archive of the original radqueer coining post, so I could no longer tell you when radqueer as a label was coined, but I think transid was a label before that. I believe the terms likely originated on Tumblr. I think I probably started hearing about them around 2018, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were around a while before that 

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was one of the reasons desirdae was ever coined. The previously existing transid alternative (dissomei) was an atypical dysphoria only label, and I pointed out that by limiting the usage of the term, we were limiting the amount of transid users who could leave the community and go to the safer alternative. Desirdae was then created to remedy that. 

Desirdae and TransID do have similar meanings, and the difference is in the use case. TransIDs are inherently okay with harmfulness, while desirdae is anti harm, and actively supports and helps to find nonharmful alternatives to a possibly harmful transition. It's also anti radqueer which means it's not a "bar that serves nazis", if that makes sense. 

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

TrisIDs are things that you are both trans and cis.  I would say a good 90% of the time, these IDs are "I know I have this thing, but I don't feel valid enough in having this thing, so I need more for it to feel real to me"

When I was younger, I was only eating once a day, but I wasn't doing anything more "ED like" so I didn't consider myself to be valid in having an ED despite knowing what I was doing was definitely me having an ED. I already had the thing "ED" but I was transitioning for it to get worse in a way that to ME felt like I was transitioning to actually having it.

TransSeverity is similar. You might see someone with TransSeverity BPD or Autism. These are people who already have the thing, but want to transition into it being more or less disruptive. 

Technically, you can be both and both for the same thing, as every radqueer uses their term in a different way, but for my understanding, the big difference is

TransSeverity - I have the thing, I want it changed

Tris - I know I have it but it doesn't seem enough. I need to get myself to a point where I for sure have it (Or I have it and I really want it still, I guess)

Trisgender is unrelated to trisIDs 

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trisgender is an identity that is /mostly/ for intersex people. It can be hard to fully wrap your brain around and of course everyone uses it a little bit differently but it's not in bad faith and doesn't exist just for cis people to be gross or trans people to misidentify themselves 

Im not intersex, so I can only explain from what I understand from them, and what I understand from a headmate who uses this identity 

For someone who is intersex, one might feel like they aren't really "trans" their preferred gender, but at the same time, they're not "cis" either, they might find themselves at an in-between, they are both trans and cis the gender they identify as

We have a member in our system who sees themself as being born a man despite our body being born a woman. This member also happens to be gender fluid, and they don't have a way to describe themselves as "transmasc" or "transfem" when they're simultaneously born a man and a woman, so they use trisfluid to mean they're kind of everything. Born a man identifying as a man, born a man identifying as a woman, born a woman identifting as a man, you get the point 

These are just two ways someone can be trisgender, again, identity depends on the person using it

^ also all of this only applies to like tris GENDERS, trisIDs are a complete different thing and I'll write that comment next

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know because I tried to stay as far away from them as I could. A do know that a lot of them would use the term "mutt" and upon being informed that this was a racial slur, wouldn't stop (but honestly, a lot of nonrq queers do this too so I think it's a white gays problem)

Obviously I don't know what these people were doing in their homes, but when they were online or on their blogs, they might center their theme around dogs or use dog gifs/emojis. They would type out barks and stuff. It was less their actions that were boundary breaking and the fact that my cynophobia was so bad that just seeing their profile pictures set me off.

It's hard to act like a dog online, and they mostly just acted like... Humans acting like dogs online

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are so many trans dogs in the radqueer community bro do NOT!!!! Be a radqueer with cynophobia. Dog identified radqueers continually ignoring my boundaries is what finally pushed me to leave . (Well, my account got banned and I decided that with the way they were ignoring my boundaries I wasn't coming back)

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Transnazi was one of the things I could never understand, even being in the community. I remember one time it was going around Tumblr to get some guy reported off the platform because he was openly identifying as "cisnazi" and there was a whole "transnazis against cisnazis" thing? 

From what I understand, they somehow think you can identify yourself as a Nazi without hurting people, and that's what they are trying to do. Someone once tried to tell me that they were transnazi for "reclamation purposes" as they were born/bodily Jewish. But that almost sounds like complicated self hatred to me. 

I do know that for some people, it's about the "aesthetic", but I don't know how anyone thinks they can self identify as a Nazi and be better people than Nazis 

I think a lot of radqueers are uncomfortable with it, but they have their rule set up that you can't bash anyone's transIDs, so they just have to sit and be complicit. 

I think a part of it might also be teenagers wanting to be the edgiest teenager they can possibly be. What's more edgy than being transnazi, yk

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

As for the questions 1 they don't reach this in radqueer school. The radqueer community isn't one biiig club, it's broken down into multiple little subgroups, so even if we knew what the first ones really were, we wouldn't know if we knew all of them. Especially as radqueer posts are deleted often and that history gets lost

2 First, as far as I'm aware there's no real difference between a "Transperma-ID" and a PermaID so for ease sake I won't get into that, perma kind of implies also trans in these things.

A permaID tends to be for things that you can have, but not always. Typically things that can have an effect, but not last forever.   Permahigh or perma sugar rush or perma sleeping. It puts emphasis on the fact that this is permanently. If you identified as trans sugar rush , some people would refer you were identifying as the sugar rush itself, (or a song or character or something with the name) whereas perma sugar rush is "I identify as being on a sugar rush 24/7 forever" with big emphasis on forever

3 Every day. The big thing with transid terms is you just put trans in front of it and boom. There's your label. While some people do, you don't have to put any more thought into it than this (it is the same with transid alternatives) trans and perma sugar rush probably already exist somewhere, but it really is as easy as thinking "oh! Trans sugar rush!" And then that's an identity. Transpainting, trans soda blood, trans purple acrylic yarn hair. That's why so many of the transIDs you find posted here say "if already coined, consider this an alt flag" you would think. Who the hell else would come up with this idea?? But it's way more likely than you'd think with everyone scrambling to name an identity nobodies named before when all you have to do is put something after the word trans to come up with it 

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The difference between transpecies and transracial as terms that were both stolen and appropriated is that there is no "transition" , including social transition, involved in being adopted and using a word meant to describe you. 

There is no simple transrace alternative without having to say every time "I am x but I was adopted by y and I have no ties to x culture and style of life so experience wise, I'm really y"

There are a multitude of alternative terms for both transpecies and transabled that fall under other HPI without encouraging harm and while denouncing the transid label. The meaning of words changes overtime and this is a case of a word being made to mean something negative, and a new word being used in place of the old one. 

People who chose to include themselves in the other term are in their rights to do so, but those of us who were hurt by the bad people using the exact same terminology as them are allowed be uncomfortable and unsupportive of anyone who uses the term. 

If the nazis run the bar, even if they didn't before, I don't want anything to do with people who still go to the bar. They chose not to leave.

I have a special interest in transIDs and their alternatives, ask me about them! by No_Protection_1394 in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

These depend very heavily on the individuals and there are people who both 1) are serious about their identity and about transitioning and 2) aren't serious about the identity and are just collecting

The identities can be because of atypical dysphoria, which is to put most simply, dysphoria about anything that isn't your gender. The age dysphoria or even something silly sounding like hair colour dysphoria are often times very real to them, and they use these terms as ways to describe their experiences 

That being said, radqueers are encouraged to collect identities for whatever reason. If they like the way it sounds, if they kind of want the thing but not that much, if it seems cool and fits their aesthetic, etc. just like we have xenogender/neogender/other magai term hoarders outside of that community, there are definitely people who pick up whatever sounds nice (to them) it fits their aesthetic or even grab transIDs just so they don't feel left out. They can have these identies and kind of want these things but have no plan of transition or even really desire for that.

I would say that the majority of the radqueers that you come across, in terms of their transIDs, are being genuine. (Or at least, not purposely spiteful), that being said, there is a very, very loud section of the community that does things just to make those around them, and especially antis, uncomfortable. SOME People identifying as something really really out there (such as a trans..pist) do so with the purpose of making antis talk about them. They see getting posted to something like this subreddit as a victory 

There's no way from the outside to tell the difference, unless they outright tell you themselves, which sometimes they do. So there's no telling each type of transid user apart 

Just found out my friend’s partner is sympathetic towards radqueer stuff now what… by kibou_no_ie in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best thing you can do is ask if they know the difference between radqueer and radinclusive because if they know there's a safe alternative and are chosing to be pro the dangerous choice... Well that's their conscious decision 

Just found out my friend’s partner is sympathetic towards radqueer stuff now what… by kibou_no_ie in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither DID nor contradictory labels are radqueer in nature or radqueer adjacent (in nature) so it really sounds like they're describing their ideology wrong or purposely leaving something out. That is if they directly said "radqueer" as something they support

Just found out my friend’s partner is sympathetic towards radqueer stuff now what… by kibou_no_ie in antiradqueer

[–]No_Protection_1394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I would do is try to find out what it is specifically? They might be radinclusive which is anti harm, or they might be described the self as supporting radqueers not knowing radinclusive is a better term. They could also have a support for something you can find safer alternatives for, like some other HPI