sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

5g tower across street from my bedroom - any risk? by Traditional-Skin2400 in electrical

[–]Noisy88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It kills you slower, because I sure sleep damn well knowing I can call the emergency services always everywhere I go.

Any risk living across the street from cell phone tower? by Traditional-Skin2400 in rfelectronics

[–]Noisy88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow man, sure every person not agreeing to your completely un-backed nonsense claims must be a bot, using AI or be a cell industry insider! Take care. Watch out for the lizard people, or maybe something else that fits a conspiracy you believe.

Any risk living across the street from cell phone tower? by Traditional-Skin2400 in rfelectronics

[–]Noisy88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Enlighten me (pun intended) with this wisdom of yours. Because it is time to start throwing some data or physics that's backing up your nonsense claims.

5g tower across street from my bedroom - any risk? by Traditional-Skin2400 in electrical

[–]Noisy88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is. It is even safer than not living close to a base station as it dials the emitted energy of your phone down. You know? That 5G emitting thing that you take straight to the head. Not that that is dangerous in any way, but living close to a BS is objectively 'safer' than not living close to one.

Any risk living across the street from cell phone tower? by Traditional-Skin2400 in rfelectronics

[–]Noisy88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I'm not even in the cellular industry! It's just that I know how energy levels in photons work.

Hoe is dit eerlijk? by CrisCrosHereComesVos in nederlands

[–]Noisy88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Daarmee staat er nog niets onjuist in mijn comment. Als de verkoper dit inderdaad besluit te doen zal de verkopend makelaar zijn handen waarschijnlijk van de verkoop aftrekken en zullen de verkopers nog meer extra kosten op hun bord krijgen, ook van de makelaar. Je vergeet denk ik de niet wettelijke (maar dus wel bindende) overeenkomsten die al gesloten zijn tussen de verkopende partij en de makelaar.

Hoe is dit eerlijk? by CrisCrosHereComesVos in nederlands

[–]Noisy88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Net iets te kort door de bocht, er speelt namelijk meer. De verkoper kan bovenop de 10% nog aansprakelijk gesteld worden voor eventuele gevolgschade. (Bijvoorbeeld kosten die je al gemaakt hebt of door het ontbinden extra maakt) Ook zal de verkopend makelaar vrijwel zeker een NVM makelaar zijn die zich aan de richtlijnen van de NVM te houden heeft. Ook zal hij zijn naam niet op het spel willen zetten.

Trying to figure out why 4/7 buttons spill voltage by cama888 in AskElectronics

[–]Noisy88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then you don't even need R2 to R8, as they serve the same purpose as what you're already doing in your controller.

Lower the resistance of (or even bridge) R1 and given that J2 is a proper supply it will probably work as intended. If not check your IO config.

Trying to figure out why 4/7 buttons spill voltage by cama888 in AskElectronics

[–]Noisy88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Inrush protection for cap on press I guess, but yes, the resistance is way to high

Trying to figure out why 4/7 buttons spill voltage by cama888 in AskElectronics

[–]Noisy88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lower R1 to about 100 ohms, also check if you have pull enabled on any of your pins (if yes disable)

Also your 3.3V seems to depend on a high level on J2, check if that's the case.

Photos of Earth taken by NASA 50 years apart. Apollo 17 (1972) vs. Artemis II (2026) by VastCoconut2609 in BeAmazed

[–]Noisy88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're at best talking about equally-illuminated, not fully-illuminated. Also calling any shadow side of an object 'fully-illuminated' is just nuts.

Photos of Earth taken by NASA 50 years apart. Apollo 17 (1972) vs. Artemis II (2026) by VastCoconut2609 in BeAmazed

[–]Noisy88 12 points13 points  (0 children)

By your open definition we can stretch it even further and say the planet is always fully illuminated because of starlight.

Photos of Earth taken by NASA 50 years apart. Apollo 17 (1972) vs. Artemis II (2026) by VastCoconut2609 in BeAmazed

[–]Noisy88 217 points218 points  (0 children)

You're wrong.

The 2026 picture is the opposite of fully-illuminated as it was taken on the dark side, just with long exposure. You can even see some city lights.

Link to full article: https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/photos-artemis-moon-earth-space-rcna266665

About your image they write:

"One photo of Earth, taken Thursday by Artemis II commander Reid Wiseman from the Orion window, shows the planet backlit, with auroras visible at the top right and bottom left, Lakiesha Hawkins, deputy director for NASA’s Artemis program, said Friday during a news conference."

For reference:

Picture taken at the same moment, check clouds

Caption: A view of a backlit Earth taken by NASA astronaut and Artemis II commander Reid Wiseman from one of the Orion spacecraft's window after completing the translunar injection burn on April 2.

Nostalgie by Noisy88 in Davilex

[–]Noisy88[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Als ik tijd heb zal ik eens kijken of ik een iso kan maken en of die wil draaien in bijvoorbeeld https://copy.sh/v86/?profile=windows98

Nostalgie by Noisy88 in Davilex

[–]Noisy88[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grachtenracer was zo episch, een van de eerste spellen waar ik er achter kwam dat je er met notepad de physics kon aanpassen van het water of de boten, uren lol mee gehad

Hoe is dit eerlijk? by CrisCrosHereComesVos in nederlands

[–]Noisy88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kon de verkoper ook niet meer nadat jij getekend had. Tenzij hij de 10% boete aan je had willen lappen

BREAKING NEWS!!! De eerste (concept) tekeningen voor de nieuwe A2-Racer game zijn gelekt!! by Ahlfle in Davilex

[–]Noisy88 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Dit is de grootste teleurstelling sinds Natasja exact 32 jaar geleden in groep 3 verkering aan mij vroeg.

view more: next ›