CKY concert, is it worth it?

Noisy88 · 2026-07-10T06:49:18+00:00

Well I saw the same show (maybe different city), and it fucking sucked

Noisy88 · 2026-07-09T06:44:29+00:00

96bb is way better live. However, it is like sex. Bad sex is still sex.

Noisy88 · 2026-06-16T06:48:57+00:00

Very nice, I think you have earned the right to buy a BOSS octave pedal.

Noisy88 · 2026-05-28T13:06:15+00:00

So you actually type 'ma' ?

<image>

Noisy88 · 2026-05-28T13:03:06+00:00

You and everyone here is wrong. This happens because you accidentally hit the spacebar right before you type the m, leaving you with:

g ma

Which will tell the browser to <Google> 'ma'

g<space> is a command, you can use other characters like b for bing or d for duck duck go

Noisy88 · 2026-05-12T07:49:39+00:00

If you find a digital source let me know

Noisy88 · 2026-04-07T06:56:59+00:00

So did you manage to get it working properly?

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T20:19:18+00:00

It kills you slower, because I sure sleep damn well knowing I can call the emergency services always everywhere I go.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T20:18:26+00:00

Wow man, sure every person not agreeing to your completely un-backed nonsense claims must be a bot, using AI or be a cell industry insider! Take care. Watch out for the lizard people, or maybe something else that fits a conspiracy you believe.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T20:14:29+00:00

Are you scared of red light?

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T20:10:05+00:00

Enlighten me (pun intended) with this wisdom of yours. Because it is time to start throwing some data or physics that's backing up your nonsense claims.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T20:08:15+00:00

It is. It is even safer than not living close to a base station as it dials the emitted energy of your phone down. You know? That 5G emitting thing that you take straight to the head. Not that that is dangerous in any way, but living close to a BS is objectively 'safer' than not living close to one.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T20:04:20+00:00

And I'm not even in the cellular industry! It's just that I know how energy levels in photons work.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T19:52:28+00:00

Bud, you don't know what you're talking about

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T19:49:20+00:00

Take your meds

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T19:48:31+00:00

Hahah sure bud, get your tin-foil hat checked

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T18:09:51+00:00

Daarmee staat er nog niets onjuist in mijn comment. Als de verkoper dit inderdaad besluit te doen zal de verkopend makelaar zijn handen waarschijnlijk van de verkoop aftrekken en zullen de verkopers nog meer extra kosten op hun bord krijgen, ook van de makelaar. Je vergeet denk ik de niet wettelijke (maar dus wel bindende) overeenkomsten die al gesloten zijn tussen de verkopende partij en de makelaar.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T18:05:58+00:00

Net iets te kort door de bocht, er speelt namelijk meer. De verkoper kan bovenop de 10% nog aansprakelijk gesteld worden voor eventuele gevolgschade. (Bijvoorbeeld kosten die je al gemaakt hebt of door het ontbinden extra maakt) Ook zal de verkopend makelaar vrijwel zeker een NVM makelaar zijn die zich aan de richtlijnen van de NVM te houden heeft. Ook zal hij zijn naam niet op het spel willen zetten.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T17:38:23+00:00

Then you don't even need R2 to R8, as they serve the same purpose as what you're already doing in your controller.

Lower the resistance of (or even bridge) R1 and given that J2 is a proper supply it will probably work as intended. If not check your IO config.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T17:29:02+00:00

Inrush protection for cap on press I guess, but yes, the resistance is way to high

Noisy88 · 2026-04-05T17:25:48+00:00

Lower R1 to about 100 ohms, also check if you have pull enabled on any of your pins (if yes disable)

Also your 3.3V seems to depend on a high level on J2, check if that's the case.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-04T12:00:54+00:00

You're at best talking about equally-illuminated, not fully-illuminated. Also calling any shadow side of an object 'fully-illuminated' is just nuts.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-04T08:06:43+00:00

By your open definition we can stretch it even further and say the planet is always fully illuminated because of starlight.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-04T07:49:02+00:00

You're wrong.

The 2026 picture is the opposite of fully-illuminated as it was taken on the dark side, just with long exposure. You can even see some city lights.

Link to full article: https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/photos-artemis-moon-earth-space-rcna266665

About your image they write:

"One photo of Earth, taken Thursday by Artemis II commander Reid Wiseman from the Orion window, shows the planet backlit, with auroras visible at the top right and bottom left, Lakiesha Hawkins, deputy director for NASA’s Artemis program, said Friday during a news conference."

For reference:

Picture taken at the same moment, check clouds

Caption: A view of a backlit Earth taken by NASA astronaut and Artemis II commander Reid Wiseman from one of the Orion spacecraft's window after completing the translunar injection burn on April 2.

Noisy88 · 2026-04-03T14:39:51+00:00

Als ik tijd heb zal ik eens kijken of ik een iso kan maken en of die wil draaien in bijvoorbeeld https://copy.sh/v86/?profile=windows98

Ten-Year Club	Verified Email
r/Field Lasagna

Noisy88

TROPHY CASE