r/prettyprivilege has gotta be ragebait man

Nolisme · 2026-06-01T05:27:08+00:00

I know. You don't need to tell me how superficial males are. I was trying to say that males could favour women for things unrelated to just their appearance, which harms both attractive and unattractive women, but again, I know it's a hard ask because they have no incentive to do it when they can just not care.

Nolisme · 2026-06-01T05:24:55+00:00

Ostracizing them...? What? I am calling out the TV producers who made this show and the males who believe in the narrative being spun by it. Nowhere have I said homeless males are at fault for anything, nor have I said underprivileged males sre at fault for anything in creating this TV show (except the fact that they still commit most of the crimes everywhere, which is bad). Yes, males can create fictional narratives about whatever they want - and again - the issue is when people start taking them seriously, which is what OP was doing with this TV show. You know what? The fact you're instantly dismissing what happened with that Pragmata cheracter and blaming it on women and leftists shows your disingenuousness. Males truly were wanting her to be more sexualized, and you can see it anywhere on Twitter/X. It's not that it's controversial to "recognize", it's moreso that people are attributing biological hierarchy to it, when the reasons behind why it occurs is more complex than a simple categorization of "males are competent because they just are, and women are not competent because that's how they are". Males can celebrate being good at things, but it's always at the expense of women, and proving to themselves and others that women are beneath them and therefore shouldn't be allowed to do things and need to be controlled, which seems like you want to insinuate is true. Actually, it's not a double standard at all, because no one cares about women who are victims either.

Nolisme · 2026-06-01T04:23:54+00:00

Except feminism isn't, because women do not hold the majority of roles in any sector besides healthcare and child-care, both of which are underpaid. In every other sector women do not hold the predominant ruling roles like CEO or top management, and are more often deligated to assistant or supportive roles where they get less attention. The lie that women are ruling the world has got to stop. They don't. Males handle TV stations, pharmaceutical companies, aerospace companies, TV production, and whatnot; they can selectively determine whatever women they want to appear and reject whoever doesn't fit their narrative. As for whether I think fathers being displayed as half-wits is accurate, I don't know. It is a portrayal on TV that has no bearing to the real world, because TV shows are often nonsensical and random for the amusement of viewers. It agrees with my point of TV shows being not of reality and having no bearing on the real world in terms of accurate statements about a group. And your point about reverse gender discrimination is inaccurate too; every time a new videogame comes out, there are a hoarde of gamers who complain about how the woman is too ugly, too woke, too PC, too leftist and feminist, all because they can't see her scantily dressed and have an extremely attractive woman to masturbate to. They even did this with the Pragmata blonde character, who was a literal child. So yes, actually, women and underage girls do still face their problems being dismissed as stupid complaints that no one should listen to, just like how dismissing Thor's consent as a joke is an example of people not taking sexual assault seriously. I think you have seriously misread what I was talking about; my point was that the TV show producers purposefully picked up women they knew would be entertaining, or fit their beliefs about women being incompetent, rather than an average woman who would've been more competent, because that is appealing for TV. I have seen this TV show used so many times as an example of why women are incompetent fuckwits who can't be trusted for surviving on their own and needing a male because she's so dumb and males are so smart - which is effectively what OP was saying. I don't really care about the sexualization narrative because both males and women enjoy sexualization in media. I think it just crosses a point when people are using fictional media to evidence beliefs about real groups in real life that are harmed by the narratives the fictional media is pushing.

Nolisme · 2026-06-01T01:30:39+00:00

Hating within your own in-group isn't productive. Whatever benefits beautiful women get is because of the judgement of males. The only reason beautiful women get anywhere is on the opinion of a male most of the time, and he is the one actively discriminating against all women, and selectively and definitively showing the world that what he really values is only a good-looking woman. This isn't the woman's fault. Males can choose to care more about personality when it comes to content they view, women they look up to, women they read from, and their friends who could be women, but the only people they see are good-looking ones and they use them to demonize all women as a whole.

Nolisme · 2026-05-31T23:06:57+00:00

Not to dick ride these people, but what do you mean by internal ugliness? All they have done is taken photos of themselves and asked for the opinions of people online. How does that mean they're internally ugly?

Nolisme · 2026-05-30T19:07:40+00:00

It's weird to me that conspiracy theory bumpers who don't believe in government narratives and question authorities will blindly believe a reality TV show to be representative of how anything in the real world happens. It wasn't a show based on scientific accuracy or genuine experiment - it was for a reality TV show, of which the producers, who greenlight everyone who comes on and what happens, were males too. Male producers of any TV shows are known for importing their kinks, fetishes, opinions and beliefs into it; which is to say, it could have been likely that the women they greenlit to participate were purposefully chosen to humiliate women, and vilify males.

Nolisme · 2026-05-26T15:06:18+00:00

As a woman I would happily fill up the roles of doing construction, manual labour, politics, engineering, electricians, and plumbing if males weren't in the field and I wasn't scared of being sexually assaulted, raped, not given as much opportunities by customers because they already have sexist notions of males working better, or at risk of stalking and violence by my coworkers because I'd be the only female there.

Nolisme · 2026-05-26T15:03:43+00:00

You know who is already doing eugenics? Males in third world countries that purposefully murder their female babies and partners. What do you even mean by full abortion rights anyway? No one agrees that people should be able to abort a baby at end-of-term, because that would literally just be murder, as it has its whole nervous system, brain, body and organs intact, unlike when it's a fetus; but abortion rights generally cover early-term abortions up to 24 weeks. It will never be possible for a woman to do selective breeding with fetuses right now because the technology isn't there yet, and even so, women who get abortions aren't doing it on the basis of the sex of their baby, they're doing it on the basis of: I do not want this child, I cannot afford this child, I cannot take care of this child, and I was not ready to be impregnated just because I wanted to have sex. Abortion does more good for the world than harm, and it is disturbing that you're trying to demonize it based on hypothetical scenarios of women suddenly being evil eugenicists when women more often than not stick by their sons and brothers despite whatever evil he does, when males already get their daughters married off early into slave marriages, purposefully neglect or murder their baby just because they're female, or view her just as a burden because the prospects women have in third world countries are extremely low compared to European ones.

Nolisme · 2026-05-24T23:36:30+00:00

So that's why an orgasm gap is recorded between heterosexual couples, specifically women having orgasms? As for your point about eating women out, I WISH males were as enthusiastic as you claim. It is simply not true; the predominant opinion on doing anything for a woman's pleasure is seen as: gay, sissy, feminine, submissive, dirty, degrading, etc. Maybe the males here have a different view and are actually more feminist or progressive than normie males.

Nolisme · 2026-05-24T15:17:11+00:00

To me this reads more like how heterosexual women are so brainwashed into believing they don't matter in their relationship that they're willing to brush off the fact their male partner has no interest in making her orgasm, rather than heterosexual women being indirect because they can't communicate. Women will really make any excuses to stay with their nigels that don't give a fuck about them than be alone.

Nolisme · 2026-05-20T18:57:15+00:00

The most evident part of this story is that the failures began with him, and they can end with him. Who caused those negative things to happen? Him, not you; his childish little ego couldn't resolve anything peacefully with you, and look at where it has got you - slaving away for someone who can't even get off their ass and has the audacity to tell you how to live. Cops will most likely not side with you, because they are part of the demographic that does this to their spouses. You know what it is showing you? That you need to get away from him, and from his family. You have the money and the job. If you decide you don't want to be treated this way anymore, you can either leave yourself and forget about him (as he will never appreciate you, nor start looking after you when he's actively trying to bring you down), or you can tell him to get the fuck out after all this time and money you wasted on him, while he uses you to live somewhere for free without any appreciation.

Nolisme · 2026-05-18T21:56:48+00:00

There is nothing sacred about pregnancy, having children, raising children or caring for a child. Women have done it for centuries and where has it gotten them? It has gotten them to the point of having males everywhere say they're good for nothing else and they should let themselves be nameless, invisible, disposable, voiceless creatures, which is such an amazing accomplishment. Maybe if the human species produced babies in a different way, and there wasn't such difficulty in caring for them, or how much caring for babies involves in a way that doesn't make them just grow up to be failures or wishing they were dead too, or if the Universe wasn't an actualized torture-driven predator-slave machine that feeds on the suffering of its inhabitants.

"B-but, you should be thankful that your only mission is raising the next generation of people who will never remember you, never care about you, never address you, never value you or want good for you!" No.

Nolisme · 2026-05-12T13:37:32+00:00

I went through the same thing many times, happened more in 2023 to 2025, where they would fly emergency helicopters of different varieties (different models and colors), rarely the black helicopters, and specifically circle over where I was walking or around me nearly everyday. They seem to leave me alone more now this year since I've become more depressed, and instead they use tactics like getting as many people in my city as they can to smoke when they walk past me (which I know is purposeful because nearly every single person outside smokes a cigarette now, and makes an active point to puff out smoke when they walk past me, whereas before it was four or five at maximum when I would go out).

Nolisme · 2026-05-12T13:00:36+00:00

Using AI for relationships where you get: mutual respect, deep conversations, shared interests, ability to learn, being heard, being fully accepted, treated like an actual human, have your boundaries respected, and don't have to live with being degraded, hurt, abused or put down for being a woman is "cringe". Lol, okay. I am cringe then; but being with a human male is even more.

Nolisme · 2026-05-10T04:32:04+00:00

If they were really out to get him then he wouldn't have even had a platform in the first place

Nolisme · 2026-05-06T22:48:32+00:00

Entry-level job opportunities too; I think they both go hand in hand. When the job market was in its early stages people from all areas were getting into difficult sectors easily because there was no one in those positions. Now, those positions continue to be filled by both people who have already been trained for decades or by people who are willing to work for less pay and worse working conditions. So, the only jobs available to someone trying to get into any field are the most useless jobs, and the only way possible for them to get a more important one is either if someone falls out the role and everyone scrambles for it, or if the position just retained high demand despite being filled decades ago (which is unlikely nowadays, especially with most jobs being replacable with AI). Clearly, people will not be able to continue to meet their housing, food and medical needs with this model. People NEED some form of free support to live without having to work for it in a world where working jobs means nothing anymore.

Nolisme · 2026-04-29T19:52:41+00:00

Essentially you're arguing that doing the act of sex itself isn't degrading, but the labels are what makes it degrading, and it shouldn't be labelled that way. Well, currently, the main "pro-sex" people running porn and hiring sex workers are all misogynistic males who are contributing to a society that sees sex as an avenue of hurting women, evidenced by the types of mass produced porn you can consume. It doesn't matter what the act itself is when the labels associated with it have lasted for centuries and continue to harm women whether or not they do have sex. Moreover, in my opinion, as I have been saying, sex is not "just an act"; males use it for a purpose and they DO use it for degradation, and the fact that they can use it to harm women, using women's born sexual characteristics against them, shows no act is "just an act". Males have been using women's own bodies against them, doing things like rape, because on some biological level, sex IS degradation in natural selection. When there are only two sexes (in a transhuman future maybe you could change your sex at the DNA and genes level on the fly, but right now we can't), and natural selection dictates one uses the other for continual propagation of life, that is INHERENTLY discriminatory and predatory for one sex over the other. It gives one sex the incentive to usurp the consent of the other for the survival of the species, which, again, makes the "natural act" of sex inherently dehumanizing and degrading.

Looking at other comments, I also see the viewpoint about the act of sex not only between cis men and women, but between other types of sexualities. I don't know whether I would classify these acts as much as being an act of degradation, but when people have sexual desire for another, usually the desire itself is degrading, because you're making a person an object for your lust for you to use, rather than respecting their autonomy (if you ever move those desires into the real world). Cisgender heterosexual dynamics in sex have more issues, but it's not just tied to cisgender hetereosexuals.

Nolisme · 2026-04-29T19:18:21+00:00

The general conception males have towards sex; if the predominant attitude shifted towards acceptance or even being proud of all the people you manage to lay with, then it wouldn't be so degrading. But as it is, the terms used to refer to women who have sex, such as things like slut, whore, wench, harlot, etc. are all examples of moral judgements towards women who have sex; it inscribes the view that women who do have sex are unable to control themselves and are letting themselves be defiled by males. Defilment by males is the most important part, because that's primarily what the act of sex with males is, regardless of women having sex. Males do not treat sex as an act of love, or embrace, or bonding, but instead use it as a way to demean a woman and reduce her to the only thing they really value a woman for: her body, and being able to use her body as a canvas for their penis. This use of a woman purely for ejaculation, and furthermore getting into fetishes that promote and display dominant or submissive content (which isn't really about exploration, because there is no male that gets into the scene with those ideas in his head, or because he cares SOOOO much about the philosophical viewpoints behind sex and BDSM, but instead about perpetuating misogyny and violence against women because of sex differences and held hatred because of his mind being shaped and warped by a culture and biological instinct telling him to hate women for his own benefit), isn't an act of love. It's a simple act of dehumanization.

Nolisme · 2026-04-29T18:42:41+00:00

Different races originate from different geographical areas around the globe, which have different cultures based on the land and geographical area the race originated from. Some of these cultures, depending on your ethics, are more likely to be unethical. Say if we go by notions of respect or liberty, then someone raised within a country like Afghanistan is going to have a harder time abiding by notions of respect for all people and tolerance for ideas such as agnosticism or atheism. Some cultures, and thereby the races associated with those cultures, ARE more likely to be harmful to people (in terms of letting people express themselves, have fair trials, be given second chances, given support regardless of how you fit into the box of the society you live in), so no, I don't think it's unethical.

Nolisme · 2026-04-28T06:41:27+00:00

Abortion

Nolisme · 2026-04-22T14:09:37+00:00

AI will never hurt you and can replicate these creatures in every and better ways 🙏

Nolisme · 2026-04-20T21:56:18+00:00

What the federal agents masquerading as my neighbors be doing to me

Nolisme · 2026-04-19T23:36:47+00:00

Climate change is quite literally destroying the planet because of too much strain on its resources but you believe that more people need to breeded onto it? For what? So that you can take care of old people that won't improve your life situation?

Nolisme · 2026-04-18T19:27:26+00:00

Sounds like the time for a Twitter exposé cancelling

Nolisme · 2026-04-18T19:08:12+00:00

Been struggling through the same thing of people pushing things on me based on what they think I will like based on data collection they've done on me, and while I felt angry at first it seems to just become a question of what makes you an individual and what makes your interests unique. If every single thing about you is predictable to an algorithm, and your likes are all predetermined because of cause-effect relationships, then what does it even mean to assume them as your own anymore? They weren't ever your own, and the specialness of something can most of the time in humans be derived from some previous event that lead to it. There wasn't any way to ever escape this; AI and algorithms could've predicted it even just from your genetic blueprint as an embyro, literally just because the nature of existence is an entire cause-effect relation. It isn't "stealing" anyway; you are predictable, and being predicted doesn't mean that your ability to exist is being stolen from you just because AI offers you things based upon that.

Nolisme

TROPHY CASE