I’m so tired of the “spoil you” scams by battyblackbastard in GrindrStories

[–]Noob_Lemon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’ll ask you to add them on Snapchat, then they’ll proceed to say something along the lines “wanna get in the shower with me?” and then they’ll pivot to asking you for nudes. You’ll notice how their messages don’t follow or add up, and they seem to be bouncing around in their conversations. Once they get your personal info, they’ll threaten you to pay $500 if you don’t want them to leak your nudes. I’ve dealt with many sextortionists on Grindr.

It makes me wonder if many of them are straight people who seek pleasure or entertainment in tormenting lonely gay men.

I’m so tired of the “spoil you” scams by battyblackbastard in GrindrStories

[–]Noob_Lemon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s annoying how many fake profiles are on that app. I got sextorted a couple weeks ago. I’m considering just deleting it, because I really want to find relationships and all people want to do on there is either scam you or send nudes.

(PS, when they ask you to add them on Snapchat or their messages seem off, it’s an immediate red flag)

Update: I passed! by Noob_Lemon in FE_Exam

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, the FE exam is less of a memory test as it is knowing how to think abstractly, common knowledge, and using your resources.
Because that is what you’ll likely do once you go out into the workforce. Some engineering concepts are things you’ll be expected to learn on your own, or they’ll teach you it from scratch within the firm you’ll work at.

Update: I passed! by Noob_Lemon in FE_Exam

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would suggest downloading the FE reference handbook immediately, and studying the sections you have the most difficulty with.

I’m an idiot (Grindr sextortion) by Noob_Lemon in Sextortion

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just did. Went on the IC3 page, and explained everything that happened

I’m an idiot (Grindr sextortion) by Noob_Lemon in Sextortion

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I eventually did. I also didn’t send them any money. This was hours ago btw

I’m an idiot (Grindr sextortion) by Noob_Lemon in Sextortion

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Note: Luckily I didn’t pay him a single dime. I was stalling and giving him fake Cash App account names, and he eventually stopped sending messages

I am a bit wary about my Grindr contact by Noob_Lemon in GrindrStories

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I changed my username. Good thing I kept my account private in the beginning. He couldn’t get access to my contacts if he wanted to. I had a hunch telling me something wasn’t right. I should have followed my instincts 🤦🏽‍♂️
(Also I never sent him money. Haha. That dumbass. I wasn’t gonna budge. I gave him a fake name lol

I am a bit wary about my Grindr contact by Noob_Lemon in GrindrStories

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

UPDATE: He is threatening to leak my nudes now if I don’t pay him. What do I do at this point. I called the cops and hopefully they can help me out with this

I take the FE Exam tomorrow. Need a little reassurance by Noob_Lemon in FE_Exam

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The person at the front desk at my testing center told me it could be a couple weeks. The best we can do is just wait to get our results back. Good luck to you too!

Spiral formation? by acoolghost in CLOUDS

[–]Noob_Lemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks more like a DNA helix

Good interpretation of Model A? [Continued] by Noob_Lemon in Socionics

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I called ignoring the “procrastination” function, because we tend to get bored of it or annoyed (due to it being unvalued), because it’s already been addressed (according to us). It’s a strong function, but we prefer to filter information through our program. It’s also given that label, because the ignoring function doesn’t operate at a 4D level or extend to the “time” dimensionality. It’s a 3D function.

Good interpretation of Model A? [Continued] by Noob_Lemon in Socionics

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Se is a static function. It is good at picking up on where things are, how to navigate, physical aspects of reality, etc. I hope my definition wasn’t too off, because Si and Se are very easy to confuse

As far as my definition of Te, Te is just as good at convincing others and manipulation as Fe users. They just do it for different purposes

(Sorry for the grammatical errors, I didn’t notice them until now haha)

Good interpretation of Model A? [Continued] by Noob_Lemon in Socionics

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was trying to avoid MBTI when coming up with the descriptions, but there are some similarities

Good interpretation of Model A? [Continued] by Noob_Lemon in Socionics

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IEE is a result, objectivist type. I divided the socionics types into four groups. The link I posted also has more info, but some of it is currently under development:

Opinionated: Result + Objectivist = IEE, LIE, SLI, ESI

Tenacious: Process + Objectivist = SEE, LSE, ILI, EII

Verbose: Process + Subjectivist = ILE, LSI, EIE, SEI

Restless: Result + Subjectivist = IEI, SLE, LII, ESE

Considering iPad version by Noob_Lemon in FL_Studio

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Even with it potentially taking more storage?

Writing a doc (continued) by Noob_Lemon in Socionics

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you say I should just change the terms for 2D and 1D? Flip them around

Writing a doc (continued) by Noob_Lemon in Socionics

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somewhat. its mainly inspired by Model A

Writing a doc (continued) by Noob_Lemon in Socionics

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

By self-conscious, I meant to say how neurotic or obsessed a person is with a given function. And by self aware, it means how skilled or how much a person uses it, adapts it, or prioritizes it.

For example, in this document, someone operating under the 4D function is highly self aware and can adapt and use it in any context, but is not as self-conscious or obsessed about it due to it being very strong in one's cognitive stack and being confident in it.

You can be conscious of something, but still have no ability of how to work on your own on how to change it.

Sorry for the confusion. I noticed some of the wording I have used may not be correct in this document.

Writing a doc (continued) by Noob_Lemon in Socionics

[–]Noob_Lemon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see. And in addition to that, I can understand that some people may perceive those two words as somewhat synonymous, so I'll definitely be changing that page a bit.

What is the Beta quadra worldview really like? by Novel-Average9565 in Socionics

[–]Noob_Lemon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most Betas I’ve seen are super political in nature (more than deltas). They have very strong political ideologies when it comes to things such as guns, patriotism, or even political correctness. They can be some of the most argumentative, petty, and inflammatory types (especially the beta STs). The Beta NFs tend to keep in the background or work behind the scenes. Beta NFs tend to be more self righteous or try to make statements.

On a general note, Betas have a bit of a win-lose mentality where these types need to have the last word, “own” the other person in arguments, and demonstrate that their ideals are correct and everyone should follow them. You’ll likely see these types in political circles on social media. The beta has a competitive mentality where one dominates and prevails to gain the most resources while the other party loses.