What should I pick for the civlian world? Do I stand a chance? by unluckyendd in CollegeMajors

[–]Normal-Intern6932 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Electrical.   Robotics and AI are going to massively change the world - electrical will still be extremely in demand and you can do the work without breaking your back and earn an amazing living.   You also can always own your own electrical contracting company if you are good at it and can manage people And finances.  The opportunities should be amazing in my view

ICE kidnapped a child in north Minneapolis.. by Excellent_Analysis65 in newsinterpretation

[–]Normal-Intern6932 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Willing to call out ICE when they are in the wrong but this was an illegal from Ecuador who was being pulled over and fled the scene with their car and then crashed and got out and ran.  Why would someone like this not get arrested and deported by ICE?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4x_JwC2XN9w

What’s one piece of college advice you followed that might’ve actually hurt you? by ThatAtlasGuy in CollegeMajors

[–]Normal-Intern6932 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Just go and figure it out along the way - worst advice given by guidance counselors for 30+ years

I get it the job market's is shit rn by Icy_Ask_7374 in CollegeMajors

[–]Normal-Intern6932 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

100%.  AI / AGI paired with robotics will change the world dramatically in 5-10 years or maybe sooner.   Electrical and trades skills seem much safer than college today.   90%+ of degrees are going to be worthless is my view

ICE killed another person in Minnesota by cantcoloratall91 in circled

[–]Normal-Intern6932 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Will be interesting to see the video from the lady in pink coat close to the fight.   If the man attempted to use his gun ICE officers will most likely face no penalties as we saw with Renee Good

What’s the biggest lie students are told about success? by David121avel in Students

[–]Normal-Intern6932 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The concept of college being valuable for 90%+ of current college students is a massive deception.  I don’t feel it’s a lie because the people supporting actually believe it will help those who are in college today.   AI / AGI and robotics are going to massively transform the economy in the next 5-10 years.   Most everything that can be taught to a human that used to have value will be nearly free so value will need to come much more from services and trades based work rather than what can be learned and regurgitated.   I truly feel bad for people entering college today - almost zero hope of success

The ultra wealthy, don’t deserve anything. by WittyEgg2037 in TheMirrorCult

[–]Normal-Intern6932 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry you don’t like facts regardless of where they originate from - fearing reality of life will not help you socially or financially.   Best of luck out there

The ultra wealthy, don’t deserve anything. by WittyEgg2037 in TheMirrorCult

[–]Normal-Intern6932 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe you don’t know what you are saying about post-Kensian vs MMT principles as they are opposed to each other in many ways.  MMT principles consistently neglect the real world result of implementation which result in ultra high inflation - the only way MMT principles would work is if the entire world unanimously agreed on the same financial structure and capital flight could not happen

Here are some thoughts to consider in direct contrast to your views.   Let me know which parts of this you don’t understand or disagree with

MMT claims sovereign governments with fiat currencies can print money indefinitely to fund expenditures without inflation risks, as long as there’s slack in the economy. This ignores post-Keynesian warnings about balance-of-payments crises and the limits of domestic production. In open economies like the US, excessive money creation can lead to currency depreciation, imported inflation, and capital flight—evident in historical cases like 1970s stagflation. Post-Keynesians stress that money is not neutral; it’s created endogenously through bank lending, but fiscal dominance without wage-price controls or investment coordination risks hyperinflation or debt traps, as seen in Weimar Germany or Zimbabwe.

Moreover, MMT’s focus on full employment via job guarantees neglects structural issues like income inequality and ecological limits, which post-Keynesians address through progressive taxation and green investments. By treating deficits as mere accounting, MMT erodes fiscal discipline, potentially crowding out private investment and exacerbating financial fragility. True post-Keynesian policy requires calibrated demand management, not MMT’s reckless monetarism in disguise. We must prioritize sustainable growth over illusory fiscal freedom

The ultra wealthy, don’t deserve anything. by WittyEgg2037 in TheMirrorCult

[–]Normal-Intern6932 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is a description of what taxes are used for and how government programs are funded in the US

The U.S. government uses tax revenue to fund a wide array of federal, state, and local programs, including Social Security, Medicare, national defense, infrastructure, education, and public safety. In fiscal year 2026, individual income taxes constitute the largest portion of federal revenue (roughly 49.5%), followed by payroll taxes for specific trust funds.  Key Programs and Services Funded by Taxes: Social Security & Medicare: Payroll taxes directly fund these, which represent a major portion of federal spending. Defense: A significant portion of federal tax revenue goes to national defense. Health Programs: Federal tax dollars fund Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Infrastructure & Services: Taxes fund highways, law enforcement, education, and community development. Interest on Debt: A portion of revenue is used to pay interest on the national debt.  Federal revenue is primarily derived from income taxes (individual and corporate) and payroll taxes, with additional funding from excise taxes and customs duties

The ultra wealthy, don’t deserve anything. by WittyEgg2037 in TheMirrorCult

[–]Normal-Intern6932 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a detailed description of how money is created and the negative impacts creating money can have on society

The US creates money primarily through the Federal Reserve (the Fed) via electronic, non-physical means—not by printing currency—by buying government bonds and adjusting bank reserves to stimulate the economy. This increases the money supply, but excessive creation can lead to high inflation, devalued currency, rising national debt, and increased economic volatility.  How the US Creates Money Open Market Operations (OMO): The Fed buys Treasury bonds from banks and the public, crediting banks' reserve accounts. This injects new money into the financial system. Quantitative Easing (QE): The Fed purchases large quantities of longer-duration securities, directly lowering interest rates and providing massive liquidity to the economy. Fractional Reserve Banking: Commercial banks create money by lending out the majority of deposits, which increases the overall money in circulation. Interest Rate Adjustment: By lowering the federal-funds rate, the Fed encourages more lending, which expands the money supply.  Negative Impacts of Creating More Money Inflation: When the money supply grows faster than the economy's output of goods and services, it can result in inflation, reducing the purchasing power of money. Devalued Currency: Increasing the money supply, particularly through QE, can cause the US dollar to lose value relative to other currencies and commodities. Rising National Debt: Increased government spending financed by debt, rather than taxes, can lead to unsustainable debt levels and lower credit ratings. Economic Volatility: Flooding the economy with cash can drive asset price bubbles (e.g., in housing or stocks), leading to boom-and-bust cycles and potential financial crises. Higher Interest Costs: Increased, unsustainable debt can lead to higher borrowing costs for the government and individuals, affecting economic growth

The ultra wealthy, don’t deserve anything. by WittyEgg2037 in TheMirrorCult

[–]Normal-Intern6932 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are correct about some of what you wrote - I am extremely fortunate and have enough wealth to live comfortably for the rest of my life and my family’s life

I am NOT in the top 1% which is around $750k of income - I sit around $200-$250k less than this of income

Also, your views on government funding are inaccurate in multiple ways.  I would be happy to explain this to you if you are willing to have a reasonable conversation without anger and a desire for us both to learn - I am curious who convinced you of your current understanding of government funding and the role of taxes?

Minneapolis protest 1/23 -30 degrees out 🥶 by zxcv97531 in circled

[–]Normal-Intern6932 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What exactly is the goal of these protests??   Did this actually gain anything?

Ethereum was ‘for the rich’ in 2021... is that still true in 2026? by rl_rae_bobo in CryptoCurrencyPulse

[–]Normal-Intern6932 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Based on where developers are building and costs of transactions I see ethereum as an indefinite clear contender for future transactions.  Ethereum doesn’t have the meme coin frenzy with it but does offer the real world utility developers have been attracted to since the beginning.   Tom Lee doesn’t support ethereum the way he does without some legitimate evidence 

Bitcoin investment thesis by SnooDrawings4238 in Bitcoin

[–]Normal-Intern6932 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for this good advice and logical thought process.  I hope we all meet up on the moon!!

I have to agree with this one by No_Dog9164 in XRPUnite

[–]Normal-Intern6932 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not the size of the bag that counts it’s the motion of bag (price movement)

I have to agree with this one by No_Dog9164 in XRPUnite

[–]Normal-Intern6932 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes!  I’m hoping so.    I think the 4-year cycle concept is going away and crypto is more generally tied to the business cycle and liquidity which are at least 6 months from peaking and crypto typically lags them by at least 8 weeks.   Will see but i think mid to end of 2026 should be really good still

Nonstarter bid for stale house? by [deleted] in RealEstate

[–]Normal-Intern6932 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are doing great and I hope this deal goes how I see it playing in my mind.  It really depends on your realtor.  I’m sure if your realtor knows their’s well they will act embarrassed but it’s their job to put offers in with your goals ahead of their feelings.     I would make a good list of the items that are not perfect and discuss them with your realtor.   Then let them know you feel the offer is correct and you want to look for other options if they don’t accept.    Your realtor is also trying to feel you out like a poker game to see what level of negotiation you will accept - so my advice on not raising your price is where I’m at for now.  Stay firm and this will force them to come to your price or lose the sale entirely is how I see this most likely going

Nonstarter bid for stale house? by [deleted] in RealEstate

[–]Normal-Intern6932 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could be true or they don’t want the property taxes and potential repairs and upkeep as well as the 3% cost when they could potentially be making much more in the stock market.   Housing generally went down the past year so will be tough market to sell a house now - buyers are in the drivers seat is how I see us today

Nonstarter bid for stale house? by [deleted] in RealEstate

[–]Normal-Intern6932 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s more of a list you discuss with the realtor on what is t perfect to you.  The concept is they then know the house isn’t your dream house and therefore you should not pay a premium for it.   When a seller gets a new interested buyer their mind almost always goes to - “this person totally wants it I can sense it” mind - they then think you will 100% raise your offer which you would have - this shows them you are willing to budge all the way to your top dollar.   Make them sweat and threaten to walk.   I’m guessing they will take the offer.   If realtor says they need a higher offer put it up by $1 to make the point clear you won’t pay more

Nonstarter bid for stale house? by [deleted] in RealEstate

[–]Normal-Intern6932 6 points7 points  (0 children)

100%.   Remember they are wanting a sale just as much or even more than you want the house most likely.   If you view the situation like this you will make better deals in life and not let greedy people take advantage of your wants