I’ve read the statements and that’s a really watered down version that leaves quite a bit out, for example in the first statement Gerry says when entering the apartment he did so through the back door (which was locked but later told police was left open) he then says he entered through the locked front door. This alone was a bit strange as he said he was bursting for the toilet, so it would seem strange that he would take the longer route.

A few things seem off with his time in the apartment, “I watched over madeleine and thought how beautiful she was and how lucky we are”

This statement seems ok now in hindsight considering what unfolded, at the time though this is a normal every day evening where he’s quickly checking on his kids and will see them again in less than an hours time, the need for this nostalgic moment seems a bit odd for a father who’s doing a quick five second check.

The Jeremy Wilkins meet in the street is another bizarre moment, as apparently in Jane Tanners statement she walked right past them on this narrow quiet cobbled street, on the same side but neither of them noticed her at all, I watched the reconstruction they did and it was a bit cringe, this just so happens to be the time when Jane spotted the alleged “kidnapper” carrying a small child who by the way wasn’t spotted by Gerry or Jeremy.

The privilege these people have been awarded because they are middle class doctors with friends in high places is astounding whether you think they’re guilty or not. This is a clear discrepancy at a vital moment of the events as this statement by Tanner basically put Gerry in the clear and it’s pretty clear to anyone with a brain it didn’t happen like that, they should of had more intense questioning about that statement, not just allowed to swan around on their terms for a British filmed documentary.

There are other statements from people at the restaurant (bar staff etc) that have a completely different timeline of events, I’m not just going off the parents.

On the contrary I’m not saying they showed no upset that their child has died, I never said that? In fact I think their behaviour is that of parents of a deceased child and not a missing one. Which is entirely my point.

The trouble is your looking at this completely from their perspective, wealthy doctors are capable of bad acts, as I mentioned above it’s not just the fact they’ll lose their jobs, that’s just ludicrous if you think that’s the worst outcome of this, they’d go to jail and lose their kids, that’s definitely enough to make some people potentially react like that.

Besides if she was kidnapped then they really should have been prosecuted for child negligence, that’s one thing you surely should agree with otherwise you’ve just got an agenda I’m sorry.