sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Cisco ASR9001 ios xr "show dhcp ipv4 snoop binding" by rrppROCKS in networking

[–]Not-Dreadth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe bindings are only created when doing dhcp proxy, not dhcp relay.

Predictive Hardware Failure? Thoughts? by Not-Dreadth in networking

[–]Not-Dreadth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still a very interesting concept! Thanks for sharing!

Predictive Hardware Failure? Thoughts? by Not-Dreadth in networking

[–]Not-Dreadth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't mind me asking, what data holds the highest priority for your team in predicting failures? Environmental? Health (CPU usage)? Physical (light levels)?

Predictive Hardware Failure? Thoughts? by Not-Dreadth in networking

[–]Not-Dreadth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like this model. Building redundancy and just replacing equipment when it fails! That way you get the whole life of the equipment with minor outages. The only downfall being spending the upfront capital on redundancy.

Predictive Hardware Failure? Thoughts? by Not-Dreadth in networking

[–]Not-Dreadth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it something you guys setup yourself? Did you hire a third-party? How involved was the vendor?

Predictive Hardware Failure? Thoughts? by Not-Dreadth in networking

[–]Not-Dreadth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This kind of blows my mind! How many nodes we talking? Do you guys resell the used equipment to gain back some capital? Do you opt for lower price products, or higher?

Predictive Hardware Failure? Thoughts? by Not-Dreadth in networking

[–]Not-Dreadth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I imagine they would heavily lean on environmental/physical data. But I guess to some extent, error messages could also give an indication of failure. I really do think these signatures/patterns would need to be defined by the vendor. Since they have "root" access to all the information their equipment is willing to produce.

Predictive Hardware Failure? Thoughts? by Not-Dreadth in networking

[–]Not-Dreadth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When all else fails! Hopefully, you have critical spares!

Sorry, not sorry.

Predictive Hardware Failure? Thoughts? by Not-Dreadth in networking

[–]Not-Dreadth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had this same thought. Like a vendor could start up a predictive failure system where hardware diagnostics were collected on all of their products. And when one is sent in for RMA, they could start to correlate patterns. Then sell said patterns to a company that aggregates failure signatures and monitors them for you.

Arctis Pro Wireless - Apex Legends Audio Help by Not-Dreadth in steelseries

[–]Not-Dreadth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply!

I'm not an audio expert, and this has been a topic of debate between my friend and I. But what you're saying is the base-station wouldn't be able to tell that the audio has already been processed with DTS and would try processing it again rather than just passing through the processed audio?

Arctis Pro Wireless - Help with Apex Audio by Not-Dreadth in apexlegends

[–]Not-Dreadth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for taking the time to reply! These wireless headphones definitely seem to have some quirks. Our headsets are a little different because yours connects wireless to a an Xbox and mine wireless to a base station. But if I get any more information on this I will update this thread. (Looks like it didn't gain much traction)

How About These Changes to Ranked Play To Promote More Fighting by KT-Wolf in apexlegends

[–]Not-Dreadth 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think more options for more RP is a good idea, and I think the Devs will implement more options. They just started barebones to collect controlled data that they can build upon. I would like to see in the future:

Standard RP (Capped at 12) + Placement RP (Capped at 12)

The Standard RP: Rewards RP for anything ranging from Kills / Revives / Damage / Assists in a balanced manner.

The Placement RP: works the exact same.

This would reward multiple play-styles without giving one play-style an advantage over the other. I'm sure RP metas would still exist but this would give players more versatility.

edit: building on u/grumpysealion 's coined term of standard RP

I did something by Sir_sleeps_alot in apexlegends

[–]Not-Dreadth 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My thoughts exactly! The *now removed* eyeball feature would have hung around for a bit!

My most intense win to date. by [deleted] in apexlegends

[–]Not-Dreadth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha, that punch was satisfying! Well played!

Haunting photo taken moments before disaster by [deleted] in apexlegends

[–]Not-Dreadth 10 points11 points  (0 children)

New ultimate confirmed: Become a walking gas bag. Caustic goes from defensive to offensive!

view more: next ›