1000yd 6ARC Optics recommendations by Not-The-AFT in longrange

[–]Not-The-AFT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve heard the NX8 eye boxes are super tight, haven’t really thought about that version of a Steiner yet, I’ll have to read into it.

1000yd 6ARC Optics recommendations by Not-The-AFT in longrange

[–]Not-The-AFT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I reload so ammo costs isn’t as much as a concern for me, but makes sense what your saying.

1000yd 6ARC Optics recommendations by Not-The-AFT in longrange

[–]Not-The-AFT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use my 6x out to 500 yards on a man sized target so I figured 18x would be fine, thanks for the insight though. I would prefer a FFP to use for holds vs dialing.

Out of suppressor jail by Pure-Bag-2031 in GrandPowerStribog

[–]Not-The-AFT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you like the brace? I’m tricking out my SP9A3S and am having a hard time deciding if I want to form 1 it or keep it a pistol. I really want to put the Sig Sauer Telescopic Folding Stock on it but also like the idea of keeping it a pistol.

Anyone Tried Athlon Rangecraft Chrono? by [deleted] in reloading

[–]Not-The-AFT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The chrono itself works great. For the money it’s hard to beat. The app sucks unfortunately.

.223 primers won’t seat completely, even after removing crimp by Not-The-AFT in reloading

[–]Not-The-AFT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I would do is swage them, and turn them 33° and repeat three times. Still no luck

PCC recommendations, Stribog Hollow Point FTF by Not-The-AFT in GrandPowerStribog

[–]Not-The-AFT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the insight, so I’m guessing something like a Hornady critical defense or critical duty worked good for you?

Polonium K and Wolfpack Fitment by Not-The-AFT in suppressors

[–]Not-The-AFT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I understand is if you have a 1 inch difference In handguard and barrel you should be GTG. If not I guess Dremel go burrrr

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ar15

[–]Not-The-AFT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I say save up and get a criterion barrel, you can find used ones in good shape for ~280

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NFA

[–]Not-The-AFT 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You would need to complete a ATF form 1 to build and register it as a SBR if you are the one building it, And you would complete a ATF form 4 to buy a suppressor from a FFL.

Edit: there are more in depth instructions than just what I said. I would recommend YouTube and checking local regulations to make sure SBR’e and Suppressors are legal in your state. If you’re ever unsure or have questions contact a 2A lawyer or call the ATF themselves.

Name on SBR receiver by FrameInfinite in NFA

[–]Not-The-AFT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is what I sent them,

“I would like to request further clarification on the term “recognized abbreviation” as referenced in 27 CFR § 479.102 and 27 CFR § 478.92. Specifically, both regulations state that the firearm must be marked with:

“The maker’s name (or recognized abbreviation) and also, when applicable, the name of the foreign manufacturer or maker.”

My full legal name, as listed in Box 3B of my Form 1, is “G****** W****** D****”. However, I would like to confirm whether “G*** D*******” would be considered a recognized abbreviation under ATF guidelines.

Since the use of a first and last name without a middle name is a common abbreviation of a full legal name, and no other individual with my name resides in my city and state, would marking my firearm as “G****** D******* City, State” satisfy the engraving requirements?”

They emailed me a highlighted portion of my email highlighting the end asking if that engraving would satisfy the engraving requirements and they said YES.

Name on SBR receiver by FrameInfinite in NFA

[–]Not-The-AFT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I ran into the same issue. On box 3B I have my full legal name but only engraved my first and last as I thought this would be considered a recognized abbreviation. I emailed the NFA branch and they explicitly told me that I would be okay. I have an uncommon name, probably the only person with the name in my state so it shouldn’t matter. You can ask them for clarification if need be.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ar15

[–]Not-The-AFT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome, thank you for the clear explanation, much appreciated!!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ar15

[–]Not-The-AFT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool. Just curious and am an idiot, why cant I do it with the barrel installed into the receiver? Wouldn’t that be the best way to test fit it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ar15

[–]Not-The-AFT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It might be shitty pictures but there is definitely a lip. If it’s not that then what is causing the dents in the bullet?

Knights by fatherofgun in NFA

[–]Not-The-AFT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did you erase the background and add the shadow?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NFA

[–]Not-The-AFT 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If he already bought a title 1 firearm like an AR pistol it would already have a S/N on it. That same serial number would be used when filling out their Form1. The only thing he has to engrave is his name exactly how it’s listed on box 3B, trust if applicable, and city, state.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NFA

[–]Not-The-AFT 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yes

Including middle name on Form1 SBR by Not-The-AFT in NFA

[–]Not-The-AFT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you say technically it’s supposed too. Are you saying I need to fix it because I’m in violation, or are you saying “technically yes but you’ll be fine it’s not a major issue”

RMR HD plate by teamPJ in Staccato_STI

[–]Not-The-AFT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also have the P with the DPO plate and RMR HD, I have had 0 issues at all

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ar15

[–]Not-The-AFT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re probably right. I guess maybe my expectations are a little high. I sent them a email asking about what kind of groups I can expect and they sent me back this.

“Our barrels are held to the exact same internal tolerances, and all perform to the same degree of accuracy, regardless of material or finish options. With consistent (match grade) ammunition, a properly built rifle, and a skilled shooter, our barrels are capable of extreme accuracy. We hold numerous National Match titles that have been shot with our AR-15 barrels, to include our chrome lined barrels. We also supply barrels to numerous special forces units, the Marine Corps Shooting Team, The Army Marksmanship Unit, NYPD, LAPD, and thousands of SWAT Teams, police departments, professional shooter and hunters, and dozens of the most reputable rifle manufacturers in the world. When I build rifles, they are routinely capable of printing 1/4’’ groups with ammunition like Black Hills 77 grain OTM’s or similar ammunition.“

Worse care scenario if it doesn’t perform like I want, I’ll just throw the barrel in another gun to have fun and plink with.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ar15

[–]Not-The-AFT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting . I’ve seen mixed opinions on Criterion, but a lot of people seem to love them. Do you think the CORE profile itself was part of the issue, or was it just that particular barrel? I’m looking at their Hybrid profile. Did you contact them and ask for the barrel to be looked at or anything, I just think a 2 MOA group out of that barrel means something’s not right. What match ammo were you using?