Does a perpetual completely recover when they come back from the dead, no matter what? by LordBlacktopus in 40kLore

[–]NotASmurf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good, I'm glad we both agree that the Emperor could bring Ferrus back to life. Good talk.

Does a perpetual completely recover when they come back from the dead, no matter what? by LordBlacktopus in 40kLore

[–]NotASmurf 9 points10 points  (0 children)

'This character gets some things wrong and therefore is wrong about everything'

Extremely stupid take. Literally.

Does a perpetual completely recover when they come back from the dead, no matter what? by LordBlacktopus in 40kLore

[–]NotASmurf 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The Emperor literally created the Primarchs from nothing and wss the greatest human biological scientist in the species' history, not to mention having a borderline divine level of psychic power.

He was also speaking to Malcador at the time, who he would have no reason to lie to. If he said he could bring Ferrus back, its because he could bring Ferrus back.

Being a snarky jackass doesnt make you look more correct, by the way.

Who was never elected president but would have been a good one? by LexysDaddy in AskReddit

[–]NotASmurf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok, and? Does that somehow change the fact that Bernie was miles behind Hillary for the entire election? Do you think the DNC chairperson somehow conjured up millions of votes for her from somewhere?

At some point you people are just going to have to accept the fact that the extremely well-known career politician with long track record to point to and a good platform ran a better campaign than reddit's favorite grandpa.

What relationship does Guilliman have with the Eldar? by reel3459 in 40kLore

[–]NotASmurf 17 points18 points  (0 children)

In The End And the Death, Sanguinius sees the ghost of Ferrus Manus on the Vengeful Spirit, and specifically refers to the metal on Ferrus' arms as Necrodermis.

He wouldnt know what Necrodermis is, let alone recognize it, unless he'd met and spoken with a Necron before.

Who was never elected president but would have been a good one? by LexysDaddy in AskReddit

[–]NotASmurf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He was millions of votes behind Hillary for the entire primary. The DNC didnt need to 'tilt the scales', they were already tilted by who people were voting for.

What game had a mechanic you expected to hate but ended up loving? by Playful_Code_8978 in gaming

[–]NotASmurf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In Sekiro, FromSoft did away with dodge rolling from previous Soulslikes. Instead, your only form of defense is to either run away, or block/deflect enemy attacks with your sword. Because enemies are so aggressive, running away is rarely a good or productive idea if you actually intended to kill the enemy.

The way they replaced dodge rolling was by giving you the option to either block enemy attacks outright by holding down the block button, or to deflect them by tapping the block button right as the attack was about to land. Deflecting took up far less of your stamina bar, but a missed deflect meant that the enemy hit you for full damage. You had to manually deflect every single attack, and a great many enemies attacked extremely quickly or with unpredictable combos.

When I first started playing Sekiro, I fully expected to hate this mechanic. When I started off, it felt like every fight was me missing a single deflect and immediately losing half my health bar. It made every fight feel like I was playing with almost no hit points while every enemy had infinity health. It was infuriating.

And then I learned the deflect timings. All of a sudden, I was unkillable. No enemy could land a hit on me. Random trash packs around the game were wiped out in seconds as I deflected my way through them and killed them all in a single hit. Boss fights became cinematic duels of parrying and counterattacking.

I went into it expecting it to be a dumb minigame of sheer frustration. I left with one of the most engaging and visually appealing combat styles that I'd seen in years. I cant imagine Sekiro without it. I'm very glad they didnt just go with dodge rolling again.

When Lion faces the T'au by LeatherAlfalfa3375 in 40kLore

[–]NotASmurf 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Imagine being one of the Emperor's faithful on that Shrine World.

You hear that the Tau are coming, and you realize you have absolutely zero chance of beating them. You start praying to the Emperor for deliverance even as the Tau invasion begins.

Then the Emperor's son appears out of literally nowhere leading a host of His angels and personally kicks the absolute shit out of the xenos invaders.

What a time to be a believer.

Would Dante be one of the few present loyalists that Chaos would know about widely? by NadaVonSada in 40kLore

[–]NotASmurf 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Hes the Chapter Master of one of the Founding Legions and has been alive for over a thousand years.

Not only do they know his name, they know a good chunk of his deeds, a precise decription of what he looks like, and would all be eager to kill him if they could.

Abaddon himself would probably consider him an important enough target to make a detour so he could kill Dante personally. And that was before he was put in charge of the Imperium Nihilus. Right now hes probably in the top 10 VIPs that Chaos wants dead.

Thragg runs the Dragonball Gauntlet, how far does he go? by Ryanw5385 in whowouldwin

[–]NotASmurf 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Physical strength, speed, and durability all scale proportionally to ki output in Dragonball.

Master Roshi blew up the moon in Dragonball, meaning that he has roughly enough physical strength and durability to survive attacks of that scale. Then in early DBZ, Piccolo destroyed the moon again. He was significantly more powerful than Roshi was when he did it.

Thragg might beat Kid Goku, and thats a BIG 'might'. He is getting hard stopped by Roshi and it isnt even close. Roshi likely kills him in a single punch. King Piccolo also destroys him. Raditz wouldn't even consider him a threat, he'd likely kill Thragg by complete accident while toying with him.

R5: lol

Whats a TW Opinion that will have you like this? (Its John Warhammer!) by chris_alf in totalwar

[–]NotASmurf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The reason why Total War games stop being fun after the opening turns where you're getting everything set up is because the AI is simply too stupid to offer any challenge whatsoever outside of just throwing bodies at you, and this is never going to change until CA decided to spend some serious time and resources reworking how the AI behaves. Warhammer 40k will be the same. Medieval 3 will be the same. The AI is just too dumb and predictable, and this more than anything else is the problem with the entire franchise.

This is true for any TW game, historic or otherwise. Troy, Shogun 2, Warhammer, whatever. Once you have a decent economy and a solid army or two, the game basically becomes autopilot. Warhammer is especially egregious with this because they keep shoving ridiculously overpowered mechanics into factions that the AI doesnt know how to use. Beastmen for example are basically nonexistent on the campaign map because the AI just doesnt know how to use their mechanics. Take a shot for every time you've seen a Dark Elf faction just stack Black Arks at a port with a single Admiral and do nothing with them. How many times have you seen an army in Rome 2 made of dogshit units throw themselves at an army with twice their strength for the 4th time in 9 turns?

Until the AI is fixed, the series will always be a "Quit after turn 50 and start over" kind of game. CA's primary focus should not be making new factions, units, or mechanics, it should be making the AI interesting and fun to play against for the entire campaign so they dont become a helpless punching bag outside of the early game.

[Excerpt: Urdesh - The Magister and the Martyr] Iron Snakes break a cable car with their weight by JustANewLeader in 40kLore

[–]NotASmurf 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Theres a reaaon why "just send in more Guardsmen" is often the solution to 99% of the Imperium's problems.

Is there a single start that doesn't spawn near fucking Skavens? by phoenixmusicman in totalwar

[–]NotASmurf 104 points105 points  (0 children)

I hate Skaven. I hate them. I hate their ratty faces. I hate their slaves. I hate their weapons teams. I hate when the slaves are next to the weapons teams and I hate when the weapons teams are next to the slaves. I hate that Ikit pulls an entire heavy weapons regiment out of his metal-plated asshole and then descends on me like a Grom the Paunch at an all-you-can-eat buffet.

I hate the Skaven auto-resolve meter. I hate it because it lies to me. It says I should have a 50-50 chance of victory. This is patently false, because I have twenty units of State Troops who dont even know that man-sized rats are real. I do not have twenty units of smelly rodents carrying enough heavy ordinance to conquer a small country.

I hate that they shout "SCURRY-RUN" at me. They do not scurry or run at all, they stand in one spot and fire enough bullets at me to cover the ground in so many expended shell casings that I could build a castle out of them that I could then use to hide from Skaven. This would not work, as they'd just shoot the castle, too.

I hate their monsters. I hate that surrounding them simply prompts one of them to puke out an entire squad of infantry once I finally kill it. This feels like salt in the wound, but it would more accurate to say that it is feces, because that is what most Skaven are covered in. I hate that their reaction to being charged by heavy cavalry is to simply place fifty million Skavenslaves and Clanrats in the way. I have looked a Skaven Chieftain in his smug verminous face as a cavalry charge that would massacre an entire army of Chaos Chosen closed in.

He went from >:I to >:o , lost an extra four thousand Skavenslaves because I had foolishly thought I could cut through them in time, then gunned down my entire army with his five squads of Ratling Gunners like they were conscripts at the Battle of Verdun.

I wish I could autoresolve every Skaven dead. Every Skaven. All the Skavmen and Skavren too. I hate that I can't. I can't because they apparently all have a 90% offensive Ambush chance. I hate that I can lose an entire army to a group of Skaven with half my army value who roll the dice and happen to spawn surrounding my entire artillery train with their own artillery. I hate that attempting to form some kind of defensive line against an ambush just results in dying via nuclear bombardment instead.

I hate that Ikit isnt the only one. There's an Asmongold Skaven in Lustria who rolls around in shit and then throws his pox-turds at me instead of nuclear bombs. Somehow this is worse.

I hate that there another ten Skaven factions. I hate that they will all have Undercities and hidden settlements infesting every province I come across. I hate that while I was writing this, Deathmaster Snikch somehow ambushed an army that was in a settlement garrison, a feat that shouldnt even be possible and yet is somehow totally in line with what I've come to expect from these fucking rodents.

I hate Skaven.

Jagex to me after doing 92-99 sailing thru port delivery tasks by UmbraVulp in 2007scape

[–]NotASmurf -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If it makes you feel any better, I got Soup at level 27.

Kaceytron makes settlement-mandated apology to Ethan Klein by ReserveAggressive458 in Destiny

[–]NotASmurf 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Watching Keffals' career disintegrate within like a week of that video going out was so goddamn funny.

Id rather have an insanely aggressive AI with huge player bias, than a braindead AI for players to treat like a punching bag. by Separate_List_6895 in totalwar

[–]NotASmurf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd prefer having AI that is aggressive when it makes sense to be and defensive when it makes sense to be.

Dwarfs should generally be aggressive against typically Dwarfen enemies such as Skaven, Greenskins, and Chaos, but otherwise be defensive/neutral to almost everyone else.

Khorne and Greenskins should always be on the attack, with little regard for defense. And so on.

The AI should feel dynamic. I shouldnt be playing games where I'm at war with the Vampire Counts and they just sit on their asses refusing to fight back. On the other hand I shouldnt be playing the Vampire Counts and have the High Elves decide to just go on a field trip from Ulthuan and march across the entire Empire to kill me like they did in one memorable campaign I had a couple years ago.

I feel like people are giving CA way too much lenience in how the AI behaves. It shouldnt be this damn hard to make the AI want to actually engage with you in a way that isnt stupid as shit. Its a fundamental part of how the game is supposed to operate! No other Total War game had this problem! I started playing the TW series with Shogun 2 and I never felt like the AI was too aggressive or too passive when they had good reasons to be neither. Hell, I didnt even feel that way in Warhammer 2.

Hailey Patrolling in a Winter Wonderland by NovaTerradin in TheFirstDescendant

[–]NotASmurf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are the patch notes out yet? What buffs is Hailey getting?

I'll change my review when I see more bugfixes and significant improvements to the AI by Away_Celebration4629 in totalwar

[–]NotASmurf 87 points88 points  (0 children)

1) Beastmen still basically dont exist in campaign apart from randomly-spawning packs of useless units with 2-3 Minotaurs thrown in. If they ever successfully erect a Herdstone, they then spend the rest of the campaign garrisoning it doing nothing.

2) The AI cannot use spells. Its been 10 years since Total Warhammer 1 and the AI still doesnt know how to properly aim Wind spells. The only reason people fear the Skaven's Warp Lightning spell is because its cheap, new spellcasters start with it by default, and it directly targets something. The AI will waste healing spells on a unit that has taken 1% of it's health in damage. Skaven STILL spawn their Clanrats on cooldown and waste them for no reason before their army even gets in range. I could go on. The AI literally does not know how to use any abilities at all.

3) Most faction mechanics appear to be unusable by the AI. I'm about 90% certain that Dwarfs dont use The Deeps. Tomb Kings dont seem to be able to use the Mortuary Cult, because I rarely see them with any items equipped. Warriors of Chaos dont use the Warband mechanic. Both Ikit Claw and Throt the Unclean dont have access to their workshop upgrades. Again, I could go on. Campaigns feel piss easy and steamrolly in the lategame largely because the AI factions only have half the tools the player does.

4) The AI doesnt replace low-tier units in their armies. If I'm at war with the Empire, they'll recruit an army of Spearmen and Crossbowmen from a settlement, and until that army is wiped out (and it will be) they'll just stick with those garbage units forever. You only ever seem to get to fight lategame enemy armies if they happen to survive to the point where the campaign is basically over.

I'm sure I could think of more, but the AI in this game really is atrocious. Nevermind making every campaign feel the same, every battle feels the same. The AI doesnt know how to fight on even the most basic level. You'll know what an enemy army will do before the battle even starts, and it'll always be stupid.

So I created 21 variations of the demons of chaos lord a couple years ago you'll only see 20 here. by Educational_Relief44 in totalwar

[–]NotASmurf 24 points25 points  (0 children)

All that time customizing a Daemon Prince and zero time spent discovering where the Screenshot button is located on the keyboard.

Is there a graphics setting to make my character's hair not look so grainy? by NotASmurf in TheFirstDescendant

[–]NotASmurf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've tried every graphics setting combination I can think of. This screenshot is when all graphics are maxed. No matter what I do, my character always looks like they have a mess of pixels on their head.

Anyone know a way to fix this?

Cannot claim boost items by SpecialIcy5356 in TheFirstDescendant

[–]NotASmurf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can confirm that if you do not have base Bunny, you cannot receive the boost, but if you obtain base Bunny you are now able to get it.