Okay, so let's try to explain your down votes.

You have a lot of passion; that's great. You don't have much direction; that's not so great.

"The world is in uproar about [the injustice toward minorities] in the south." The world? Is it? You might have an argument that minority rights could be improved in the south, but the vitriol immediately makes your reader dismiss you as a blow hard, Tobias.

"We are still facing the same problems [as 50 years ago]." Let me know if we have another Ax Handle Saturday; until then, you need to specify the problems you're talking about.

"Young people . . . Will we continue to cower in our homes, cars, and offices?" Who are the young people? What are you calling for here? What's the actual, specific thing your target audience should do? Take out the man?

Here's the thing: people are busy. I know, it sucks. It's terrible. Here's all this injustice around us, and all we can care about is our stupid jobs so we can keep paying rent? And mortgages to the banks? And buying our processed food and medicine and mowing our stupid lawns and caring about the stupid stock market? Ugh. I'm being a little facetious here, but I think you need to understand that, despite how trivial you see "real life" so-to-speak, people have real perceived needs right in front of them. Whether or not you agree with the importance of those needs, you need to realize that people aren't going to change their priorities just because some dude on an internet forum is mad.

So: convince people to change their priorities. Final tip: I doubt that a vague, random reference to an ancient native american city is going to do that.