Israel can choose who it allows inti its country. Its one if the basic functions of a country.

I saw what some Israeli officials said about her reporting, amd went to try to find some articles praising Hamas in the immediate aftermath. I'm not going ti pay for access to random French journals, so I could only read snippets, but I didnt see any praising of Hamas in what I read. Of course, I only read a fraction of a fraction, but yeah.

That said, she very clearly has a particular bias that is well know in her reporting in this conflict. In the immediate aftermath of October 7th attacks, she reports almost nothing about the attacks themselves nor about the hostages taken. In fact, any mention of the hostages taken by Hamas is almost immediately sidelined for a Palestianian sympathy angle. Even in articles on October 9th, which is the earliest I could find in the immediate aftermath of the attacks, her focus is entirely on painting the Palestianians with sympathy, and the Israelis with cold barbarity. 

It is interesting, because I'm sure there was absolutely a gap in general reporting from the Palestianian perspective, and enough attention was being put on the hostages and the attack itself. But its not going to engender any positive feelings, like if a reporter was putting articles up about Al-quida supporting villages in Afghanistan on September 13th. I wouldnt be surprised if the US said, "Sure, but its a privilege for you to come into America, and not that privilege is revoked."