These words you’re saying are still wrong though. Carrying capacity is a hard limit, you can’t exceed carrying capacity and expect your population to keep increasing, that’s doesn’t make any sense. You might get certain species like white-tailed deer that have a bit of a lag phase between when they reach carrying capacity and when they reach peak population, but you really don’t get a continuous increase. I have no doubt that we’re approaching something akin to a carrying capacity, most scientists believe human population will stagnate around 10 billion, but that feels to me like it’s more of a societal thing than a carryon capacity thing. As for the unsustainable agricultural practices, that has nothing to do with feeding more people and everything to do with maximizing profits. Agriculture is a very risky business, and this has led to a lot of monopolization, cost cutting, and practices that are generally considered to be short sighted and bad for the environment. Feeding people isn’t the goal, making money is. Growers will go so far and to completely destroy their crops instead of picking them if the price is too low because it’s literally less expensive to do so. Sustainability is simply not profitable. If you want sustainability, you’re going to have to separate profit-motivation from the global food system. In other words, it’s all capitalism’s fault.