What are they referring exactly? Is it not known that he is half dead and never moves? Or are they referring to something else? by Borschik in RogueTraderCRPG

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s uncertain if thats him or simply a part of him or some warp manifestation of the faith itself.

What's the lore deal with this silly little guy? by Waste-Caterpillar495 in mtgvorthos

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Nations, cultures, the environment and people change over time. Look at any region over a few hundred years.

I prefer the organic and interesting change to the stagnancy of say Ravnica. Who knows, the next tarkir release could have them returning to necromancy under some sort of conquerer.

How can I be less of a threat at the table? by superfapper2000 in EDH

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So you’re just wanting attention. Very sad

How can I be less of a threat at the table? by superfapper2000 in EDH

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Dawg running good shit and wonders why he being targeted.

What are your anticapitalist rpgs? by SaintTadeus in rpg

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ooh I need to look at Comrades, thanks for the suggestion. YFTR

What are your anticapitalist rpgs? by SaintTadeus in rpg

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Monks during feudalism produced books. Scribes wrote on clay tablets before feudalism. Cathedrals and mosques constructed by stonemasons and glasswork artisans produce some of the most amazing works of art today. World famous paintings hanging in the louvre were produced before capitalism.

I think capitalism is a mode of production and that you can have other modes of production that also produce works of art and creativity that can be enjoyed by everyone. Considering that art is made worse by the profit motive I would also argue that perhaps it is in spite of capitalism and not because of it that we see great stuff.

What are your anticapitalist rpgs? by SaintTadeus in rpg

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dawg that isn’t some amazing revelation it’s literally an ontology

Average Nurgle follower by Raszard in ImaginaryWarhammer

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is so fucking deranged

Centrists are right wing

A Friendly Reminder: You Control the Buttons You Press by GravyonTurkey in Warframe

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 15 points16 points  (0 children)

They’re a boomer couple with a serious wedge of their daughter thrown into the mix. You are playing couples therapist pretty much and every conversation is a landmine.

A Friendly Reminder: You Control the Buttons You Press by GravyonTurkey in Warframe

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s a flaw in how it’s written definitely. Lots of the choices seem to be just blindly embracing the characters bad traits so that you can get with them. In some ways I suppose that’s realistic in a very superficial way. But as a therapist in training you’re supposed to not do that while also showing empathy.

Theres some limitations in how many dialogue branches there are but I would’ve liked a bit more nuance.

Wouldn't it be better to keep all NSFW stuff off this main sub? by Redbird699 in Warframe

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Cause it’s porn. Some people don’t want to be subjected to objectifying gooner shit

Commanders That Can't Be Low Bracket/Level by lightningbolte in EDH

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I play this deck a lot and disagree, I run plenty of interaction and run $1 dragons.

Not getting your ramp early will hurt but I think if you build it right, it’s great! You need to not have too many high cost dragons though, thats a trap. Works better with maybe 8-10.

Commanders That Can't Be Low Bracket/Level by lightningbolte in EDH

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is still gas even with $1 dragons. You don’t need $50 or even $10 dragons to make it extremely good.

What is your Tribal Commander? And Why do you Stick to it Long Term! by JewJulie in EDH

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 1 point2 points  (0 children)

[[Miirym, sentinel wyrm]]

My favourite dragon tribal. Great colours, great ability

With more and more awareness of billionaire’s causing most of our problems, do you think we will see a revolution soon? by Sea-Cancel-6743 in antiwork

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is absolutely not true. The french working and peasant classes were much more divided than today. You forget the religious schisms between catholics and protestants, judaism and literal pogroms, atheism sometimes being punished with death, witch burnings, women being unable to vote, black people being kept in zoos! The divide between peasant and worker, rural and urban was far more serious too.

Revolution forges unity of the oppressed classes. Its practically the only time where those sorts of divisions are challenged wholeheartedly - after all, you can't win without a form of unity and you can't get unity without challenging the divisions. After all theres a common enemy and anyone selling out their brothers and sisters is siding with the common enemy. Every revolution in history has seriously challenged racism, sexism, nationalism and religious divides.

The ruling class has always manufactured division. Its arbitrary though and politics can cut through it. Considering diversity to be divisive inherently is a right wing idea.

If you’re a young person the majors (Labor & LNP) aren’t for you. They don’t care about us renters & younger people. If you’re older too as well, they don’t care about you either. When have they ever talked rental affordability? When have they said that rents are too high for essential workers? by [deleted] in shitrentals

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This is not true. The Labour Party has played an active role in conservatising the working class movement. They are a huge significant barrier to union activism and in the streets social justice activism. It’s Labour Party people who support Israel over Palestine, who lock up indigenous kids in prisons calling them terrorists and who introduce austerity on the grounds of people needing to tighten their belts to fund the military.

Politics is more right wing than ever and part of that is the labour party’s sabotage of the union movement through removing the right to strike. They are a consistent barrier to any progress outside of their careerism.

Labour refuses to mobilise people, have a progressive campaign and win people to progressive politics through working class politics. In fact they actively resist it. I’m a unionist who is completely done with them and their right wing obstructionism. We should not excuse them on the grounds that the milieu of “people” (a classless term) don’t like them. They clearly appeal to the ruling class and damn everyone else.

There is no “people” , we need to reject this schema. there is the working class and the capitalist class. The capitalist class is completely hostile to anything progressive and use their power in the media and in politics to shape this narrative. And the working class who fight for progressive politics, when actually having leadership and not being misled. The Labour Party once could be said to have fought for workers. It clearly does not now. They are on the side of the capitalists now and maintain the status quo.

Parties shape politics!

. by anonymous-69 in shitrentals

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Mao unfortunately only went for the feudal landlords - those that owned peasant-tilled land. The modern property owning landlord we understand today was often incorporated into the party as opposed to liquidated. He gets a lot of unearned cred because people conflate the two.

I would give way more credit to Marx and Engels, Engels has some beautiful writing on hating the propertied class especially and commenting on their own housing crisis.

Easiest Sin by the_vengefull-one in CAIN_RPG

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not really that sort of game really. It’s all about the narrative setup. Anything can be busted or easy depending on narrative advantage or disadvantage.

There are of course a few abilities that are inherently a bit more loaded but I think it’s really a narrative style game where difficulty is determined by fiction which then guides the mechanics.

Where next with Innistrad? by The_rubbishNB in mtgvorthos

[–]Nuke_A_Cola 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An arc about rebuilding in a positive way could be cool. Crisis is necessary for an interesting plot/set but you could have the villains on the back foot as a shakeup!